BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceAdobe · APSB25-01
Linked CVE review
Update Adobe InDesign to the fixed Adobe release
- Linked CVEs
- 7
- Confirmed exploited
- 0
- PoC or lab evidence
- 0
- Maximum CVSS
- 7.8
Confirmed exploitation, public exploit material, EPSS probability and CVSS severity answer different questions. “No confirmation recorded” means the checked sources do not currently confirm exploitation. It is not proof that exploitation has not occurred.
| CVE and description | Severity | Exploit reality | Forecast and access | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-21123 Scheduled assessment InDesign Desktop | Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)InDesign Desktop versions ID20.0, ID19.5.1 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | 7.8 · CVSS 3.1 · HighSource: CNA | No confirmation recordedNo CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.None recordedNo exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds. | EPSS: 0.35% · 25.9th percentileForecast date: 2026-10-05LOCAL · LOW complexity · NONE privileges · REQUIRED user interaction | Within 7 daysHigh technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.Awaiting fix. No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data. |
CVE-2025-21158 Scheduled assessment InDesign Desktop | Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) (CWE-191)InDesign Desktop versions ID20.0, ID19.5.1 and earlier are affected by an Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | 7.8 · CVSS 3.1 · HighSource: CNA | No confirmation recordedNo CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.None recordedNo exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds. | EPSS: 0.31% · 22.2th percentileForecast date: 2026-10-05LOCAL · LOW complexity · NONE privileges · REQUIRED user interaction | Within 7 daysHigh technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.Awaiting fix. No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data. |
CVE-2025-21157 Scheduled assessment InDesign Desktop | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)InDesign Desktop versions ID20.0, ID19.5.1 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | 7.8 · CVSS 3.1 · HighSource: CNA | No confirmation recordedNo CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.None recordedNo exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds. | EPSS: 0.28% · 19.0th percentileForecast date: 2026-10-05LOCAL · LOW complexity · NONE privileges · REQUIRED user interaction | Within 7 daysHigh technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.Awaiting fix. No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data. |
CVE-2025-21121 Scheduled assessment InDesign Desktop | Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)InDesign Desktop versions ID20.0, ID19.5.1 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | 7.8 · CVSS 3.1 · HighSource: CNA | No confirmation recordedNo CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.None recordedNo exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds. | EPSS: 0.27% · 17.2th percentileForecast date: 2026-10-05LOCAL · LOW complexity · NONE privileges · REQUIRED user interaction | Within 7 daysHigh technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.Awaiting fix. No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data. |
CVE-2025-21124 Scheduled assessment InDesign Desktop | Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)InDesign Desktop versions ID20.0, ID19.5.1 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | 5.5 · CVSS 3.1 · MediumSource: CNA | No confirmation recordedNo CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.None recordedNo exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds. | EPSS: 0.29% · 20.0th percentileForecast date: 2026-10-05LOCAL · LOW complexity · NONE privileges · REQUIRED user interaction | ScheduledMedium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.Awaiting fix. No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data. |
CVE-2025-21125 Scheduled assessment InDesign Desktop | NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476)InDesign Desktop versions ID20.0, ID19.5.1 and earlier are affected by a NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability that could result in an application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to crash the application, leading to a denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | 5.5 · CVSS 3.1 · MediumSource: CNA | No confirmation recordedNo CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.None recordedNo exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds. | EPSS: 0.26% · 16.3th percentileForecast date: 2026-10-05LOCAL · LOW complexity · NONE privileges · REQUIRED user interaction | ScheduledMedium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.Awaiting fix. No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data. |
CVE-2025-21126 Scheduled assessment InDesign Desktop | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)InDesign Desktop versions ID20.0, ID19.5.1 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in an application denial-of-service condition. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the application to crash, resulting in a denial of service. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | 5.5 · CVSS 3.1 · MediumSource: CNA | No confirmation recordedNo CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.None recordedNo exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds. | EPSS: 0.26% · 15.5th percentileForecast date: 2026-10-05LOCAL · LOW complexity · NONE privileges · REQUIRED user interaction | ScheduledMedium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.Awaiting fix. No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data. |