Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- EPSS is 1.57% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE Intelligenceaiyiyi121 · SxDevOps
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Patch availableA vulnerability has been found in aiyiyi121 SxDevOps 1.0/1.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function paramiko.SSHClient.exec_command of the file backend/ops/host_tasks.py of the component TASK_RUN_COMMAND. Such manipulation of the argument command leads to command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is 2b4bf8585c3e731e7a8af30801ea46680bc783f9. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.
A vulnerability has been found in aiyiyi121 SxDevOps 1.0/1.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function paramiko.SSHClient.exec_command of the file backend/ops/host_tasks.py of the component TASK_RUN_COMMAND. Such manipulation of the argument command leads to command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is 2b4bf8585c3e731e7a8af30801ea46680bc783f9. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.
Untrusted input reaches a command interpreter without sufficient validation or separation from command syntax.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
A vulnerability has been found in aiyiyi121 SxDevOps 1.0/1.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function paramiko.SSHClient.exec_command of the file backend/ops/host_tasks.py of the component TASK_RUN_COMMAND. Such manipulation of the argument command leads to command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is 2b4bf8585c3e731e7a8af30801ea46680bc783f9. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.
Untrusted input reaches a command interpreter without sufficient validation or separation from command syntax.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:XCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 20 Sept 2026 · Last source change 21 Sept 2026, 15:05 UTC · CWE-77 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.