BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-93752High confidence

CSSOM through 0.5.0 Denial of Service via length Property

NV · CSSOM

8.7HighCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 18 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.68% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs NV CSSOM and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-93752 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product SecurityCSSOM: CSSOM: Denial of Service due to improper property name validation
5 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • dotnet8.0.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • grafana12.4.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • grafana13.1.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • grafana13.2.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • prometheus3.13.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
Summary
A flaw was found in CSSOM. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to trigger a denial of service by providing a specially crafted stylesheet. The issue stems from improper validation of reserved property names within the `CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty()` function. Exploiting this, an attacker can cause excessive memory allocation during CSS text serialization, leading to the termination of the affected process.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
CVE-2026-93752 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-93752
62 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • pgadmin4 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • pgadmin4-doc as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • pgadmin4-web as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • system-user-pgadmin as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cockpit as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-bridge as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-machines as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-networkmanager as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-selinux as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-storaged as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-system as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-ws as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
Summary
CSSOM through 0.5.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty() that fails to validate reserved property names. Attackers can supply a stylesheet with a declaration named length to replace the internal counter and trigger excessive memory allocation during cssText serialization, causing process termination.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-83257

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

CSSOM through 0.5.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty() that fails to validate reserved property names. Attackers can supply a stylesheet with a declaration named length to replace the internal counter and trigger excessive memory allocation during cssText serialization, causing process termination.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
8.7 · CVSS 4.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

CSSOM through 0.5.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty() that fails to validate reserved property names. Attackers can supply a stylesheet with a declaration named length to replace the internal counter and trigger excessive memory allocation during cssText serialization, causing process termination.

What

CSSOM through 0.5.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty() that fails to validate reserved property names. Attackers can supply a stylesheet with a declaration named length to replace the internal counter and trigger excessive memory allocation during cssText serialization, causing process termination.

Why

The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies multiple attributes, properties, or fields that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control which attributes can be modified.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

CSSOM through 0.5.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty() that fails to validate reserved property names. Attackers can supply a stylesheet with a declaration named length to replace the internal counter and trigger excessive memory allocation during cssText serialization, causing process termination.

Why

The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies multiple attributes, properties, or fields that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control which attributes can be modified.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

CISA Vulnrichment records proof-of-concept exploitation in its SSVC data. BlackTree has not independently executed or validated exploit material.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-915 ↗

CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes. The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies multiple attributes, properties, or fields that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control which attributes can be modified.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VAHighVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-915Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-83257Official EUVD mapping

CSSOM through 0.5.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty() that fails to validate reserved property names. Attackers can supply a stylesheet with a declaration named length to replace the internal counter and trigger excessive memory allocation during cssText serialization, causing process termination.

Official EUVD record ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
  • pgadmin4 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • pgadmin4-doc as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • pgadmin4-web as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • system-user-pgadmin as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cockpit as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-bridge as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-machines as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-networkmanager as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-selinux as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-storaged as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-system as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit-ws as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3
  • cockpit as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4
  • cockpit-bridge as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4
  • cockpit-machines as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4
  • cockpit-networkmanager as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4
  • cockpit-selinux as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4
  • cockpit-storaged as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4
  • cockpit-system as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4
  • cockpit-ws as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4
  • cockpit as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5
  • cockpit-bridge as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5
  • cockpit-networkmanager as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5
  • cockpit-selinux as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5
  • cockpit-storaged as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5
  • cockpit-system as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5
  • cockpit-ws as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5
  • golang-github-prometheus-prometheus as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • pgadmin4 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7
  • pgadmin4-doc as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7
  • and 32 more
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Sept 2026 · Last source change 24 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC · CWE-915 · Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-19
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-83257
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD awaiting enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-93752 to remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-93752.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-93752
    After
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-93752
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    dotnet8.0.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; grafana12.4.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; grafana13.2.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
    After
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    dotnet8.0.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; grafana12.4.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; grafana13.1.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; grafana13.2.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; prometheus3.13.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
    After
    dotnet8.0.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; grafana12.4.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; grafana13.2.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  4. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2026-83257 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2026-83257"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  5. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    CVE.org ↗
  6. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-93752 · cve.blacktree.nl