BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-8674High confidence

Assertion failure in the DNS stub resolver with a long search domain

The GNU C Library · glibc

5.3MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.34% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs The GNU C Library glibc and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceglibcAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceglibcAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.43-6Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.43-6Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveglibcUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-8674 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityglibc: glibc DNS stub resolver: Denial of Service via long search domain in configuration
655 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • glibc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-all-langpacks as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-benchtests as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-gconv-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-langpack-aa as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-langpack-af as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-langpack-agr as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-langpack-ak as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • glibc-langpack-am as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the GNU C Library (glibc) DNS stub resolver. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker on the local network to cause a denial of service by providing a specially crafted, excessively long search domain. When the resolver attempts to initialize with this long domain from /etc/resolv.conf or the LOCALDOMAIN environment variable, it triggers an assertion failure, which aborts the process. This can be exploited without privileges on the target system, potentially through network configuration mechanisms like DHCP or a VPN server.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://images.redhat.com/
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-82326

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

Initializing the DNS stub resolver from an /etc/resolv.conf file, or a LOCALDOMAIN environment variable, whose search list contains a domain of roughly 200 characters or more in the GNU C Library version 2.26 to 2.44 results in an assertion failure which aborts the process. The resolver truncates the search list when copying it into the fixed-size _res.defdname buffer, then asserts that the copy is consistent with the full configuration. The consistency check compared against the wrong size and did not handle a first entry that does not fit, so a correctly truncated list failed the assertion. Any process that resolves names through the library is affected, including long-running processes that reload /etc/resolv.conf on the next query after it changes. Search domains are commonly written to /etc/resolv.conf from data received over DHCP or from a VPN server, so an attacker on the local network may be able to trigger this without privileges on the target system, subject to validation by the network configuration software.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
5.3 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

Initializing the DNS stub resolver from an /etc/resolv.conf file, or a LOCALDOMAIN environment variable, whose search list contains a domain of roughly 200 characters or more in the GNU C Library version 2.26 to 2.44 results in an assertion failure which aborts the process. The resolver truncates the search list when copying it into the fixed-size _res.defdname buffer, then asserts that the copy is consistent with the full configuration. The consistency check compared against the wrong size and did not handle a first entry that does not fit, so a correctly truncated list failed the assertion. Any process that resolves names through the library is affected, including long-running processes that reload /etc/resolv.conf on the next query after it changes. Search domains are commonly written to /etc/resolv.conf from data received over DHCP or from a VPN server, so an attacker on the local network may be able to trigger this without privileges on the target system, subject to validation by the network configuration software.

What

Initializing the DNS stub resolver from an /etc/resolv.conf file, or a LOCALDOMAIN environment variable, whose search list contains a domain of roughly 200 characters or more in the GNU C Library version 2.26 to 2.44 results in an assertion failure which aborts the process. The resolver truncates the search list when copying it into the fixed-size _res.defdname buffer, then asserts that the copy is consistent with the full configuration. The consistency check compared against the wrong size and did not handle a first entry that does not fit, so a correctly truncated list failed the assertion. Any process that resolves names through the library is affected, including long-running processes that reload /etc/resolv.conf on the next query after it changes. Search domains are commonly written to /etc/resolv.conf from data received over DHCP or from a VPN server, so an attacker on the local network may be able to trigger this without privileges on the target system, subject to validation by the network configuration software.

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Initializing the DNS stub resolver from an /etc/resolv.conf file, or a LOCALDOMAIN environment variable, whose search list contains a domain of roughly 200 characters or more in the GNU C Library version 2.26 to 2.44 results in an assertion failure which aborts the process. The resolver truncates the search list when copying it into the fixed-size _res.defdname buffer, then asserts that the copy is consistent with the full configuration. The consistency check compared against the wrong size and did not handle a first entry that does not fit, so a correctly truncated list failed the assertion. Any process that resolves names through the library is affected, including long-running processes that reload /etc/resolv.conf on the next query after it changes. Search domains are commonly written to /etc/resolv.conf from data received over DHCP or from a VPN server, so an attacker on the local network may be able to trigger this without privileges on the target system, subject to validation by the network configuration software.

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → Reachable Assertion → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-617 ↗

CWE-617: Reachable Assertion. The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
UnauthenticatedCWE-617
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-82326Official EUVD mapping

Initializing the DNS stub resolver from an /etc/resolv.conf file, or a LOCALDOMAIN environment variable, whose search list contains a domain of roughly 200 characters or more in the GNU C Library version 2.26 to 2.44 results in an assertion failure which aborts the process. The resolver truncates the search list when copying it into the fixed-size _res.defdname buffer, then asserts that the copy is consistent with the full configuration. The consistency check compared against the wrong size and did not handle a first entry that does not fit, so a correctly truncated list failed the assertion. Any process that resolves names through the library is affected, including long-running processes that reload /etc/resolv.conf on the next query after it changes. Search domains are commonly written to /etc/resolv.conf from data received over DHCP or from a VPN server, so an attacker on the local network may be able to trigger this without privileges on the target system, subject to validation by the network configuration software.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3452GNU libc: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer aus einem angrenzenden Netzwerk kann eine Schwachstelle in GNU libc ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260923Security Bulletin 23 Sep 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Sep 2026, published on 23 September 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 Sept 2026 · Last source change 17 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC · CWE-617 · Reachable Assertion

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-18
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-82326
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD awaiting enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    glibc: 2.26 ≤ 2.44 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    glibc: 2.26 ≤ 2.44 · Fixed: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://images.redhat.com/
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-8674 to remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-8674.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-8674
    After
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-8674
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  3. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  4. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    glibc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-all-langpacks as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-benchtests as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-gconv-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-aa as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-af as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-agr as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ak as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-am as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-an as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-anp as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ar as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-as as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ast as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ayc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-az as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-be as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bem as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ber as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bg as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bhb as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bho as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bi as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bn as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bo as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-br as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-brx as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; and 626 more
    After
    glibc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-all-langpacks as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-benchtests as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-gconv-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-aa as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-af as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-agr as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ak as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-am as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-an as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-anp as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ar as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-as as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ast as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ayc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-az as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-be as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bem as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-ber as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bg as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bhb as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bho as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bi as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bn as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-bo as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-br as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; glibc-langpack-brx as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; and 625 more · Fixed: compat-libpthread-nonshared-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; compat-libpthread-nonshared-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-all-langpacks-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-all-langpacks-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-benchtests-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-benchtests-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-common-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-common-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-devel-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-devel-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-doc-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@noarch@public-hummingbird-aarch64-rpms as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-doc-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@noarch@public-hummingbird-x86_64-rpms as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-gconv-extra-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-gconv-extra-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-aa-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-aa-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-af-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-af-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-agr-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-agr-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-ak-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-ak-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-am-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-am-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-an-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-an-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; glibc-langpack-anp-0:2.43-8.6.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; and 426 more
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  5. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2026-82326 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2026-82326"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  6. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-8674 · cve.blacktree.nl