BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-84649High confidence

Jenkins Project Jenkins: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Jenkins Project · Jenkins

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Jenkins Project Jenkins and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-84649 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityjenkins: stapler: Stapler: Cross-site request forgery token disclosure allows session hijacking
3 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • jenkins.src as a component of OpenShift Developer Tools and Services
  • ocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel8 as a component of OpenShift Developer Tools and Services
  • ocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel9 as a component of OpenShift Developer Tools and Services
Summary
A flaw was found in Stapler, a web framework used by Jenkins. An HTTP endpoint that serves dynamically generated JavaScript resources inadvertently embeds a user's cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token, also known as a crumb, as plain text. This allows a remote attacker, who controls a web page on the same site as Jenkins, to obtain a valid crumb for a targeted user's session. Consequently, the attacker can perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the user, leading to session hijacking.
Remediation
To mitigate this issue, administrators should disable the Resource Root URL feature in Jenkins or configure it to use a different domain than the main Jenkins instance. This prevents an attacker from loading dynamically generated JavaScript resources containing the CSRF token from a co-hosted page.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-70115

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In Stapler 1839.ved17667b_a_eb_5 through 2107.v8dfcb_e8ed317 (both inclusive), except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a_6, included in Jenkins 2.447 through 2.579 (both inclusive), LTS 2.452.1 through 2.568.2 (both inclusive), an HTTP endpoint serving dynamically generated JavaScript resources embeds the user's cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token (crumb) as a string literal, allowing attackers with control over a page hosted on the same site as Jenkins to obtain a valid crumb for the targeted user's session and perform actions on their behalf.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
8.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In Stapler 1839.ved17667b_a_eb_5 through 2107.v8dfcb_e8ed317 (both inclusive), except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a_6, included in Jenkins 2.447 through 2.579 (both inclusive), LTS 2.452.1 through 2.568.2 (both inclusive), an HTTP endpoint serving dynamically generated JavaScript resources embeds the user's cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token (crumb) as a string literal, allowing attackers with control over a page hosted on the same site as Jenkins to obtain a valid crumb for the targeted user's session and perform actions on their behalf.

What

In Stapler 1839.ved17667b_a_eb_5 through 2107.v8dfcb_e8ed317 (both inclusive), except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a_6, included in Jenkins 2.447 through 2.579 (both inclusive), LTS 2.452.1 through 2.568.2 (both inclusive), an HTTP endpoint serving dynamically generated JavaScript resources embeds the user's cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token (crumb) as a string literal, allowing attackers with control over a page hosted on the same site as Jenkins to obtain a valid crumb for the targeted user's session and perform actions on their behalf.

Why

The application accepts a state-changing browser request without a reliable anti-forgery check.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In Stapler 1839.ved17667b_a_eb_5 through 2107.v8dfcb_e8ed317 (both inclusive), except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a_6, included in Jenkins 2.447 through 2.579 (both inclusive), LTS 2.452.1 through 2.568.2 (both inclusive), an HTTP endpoint serving dynamically generated JavaScript resources embeds the user's cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token (crumb) as a string literal, allowing attackers with control over a page hosted on the same site as Jenkins to obtain a valid crumb for the targeted user's session and perform actions on their behalf.

Why

The application accepts a state-changing browser request without a reliable anti-forgery check.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-352 ↗

CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-352
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-70115Official EUVD mapping

In Stapler 1839.ved17667b_a_eb_5 through 2107.v8dfcb_e8ed317 (both inclusive), except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a_6, included in Jenkins 2.447 through 2.579 (both inclusive), LTS 2.452.1 through 2.568.2 (both inclusive), an HTTP endpoint serving dynamically generated JavaScript resources embeds the user's cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token (crumb) as a string literal, allowing attackers with control over a page hosted on the same site as Jenkins to obtain a valid crumb for the targeted user's session and perform actions on their behalf.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3166Jenkins: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Jenkins und verschiedenen Plugins ausnutzen, um Daten offenzulegen oder zu manipulieren, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) durchzuführen, beliebigen Code auszuführen oder die Sitzung eines anderen Benutzers zu übernehmen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260909Security Bulletin 9 Sep 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 9 Sep 2026, published on 9 September 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CSIRT Italia · Italian · rilevate-nuove-vulnerabilita-in-jenkins-3Rilevate nuove vulnerabilità in Jenkins

Aggiornamenti di sicurezza Jenkins sanano molteplici vulnerabilità, di cui 6 con gravità "alta", presenti nel software open source per l'automazione di processi di integrazione e distribuzione continua (CI/CD).

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Jenkins: 2.580 < *, < 2.447, 2.568.3 < 2.568.*
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
To mitigate this issue, administrators should disable the Resource Root URL feature in Jenkins or configure it to use a different domain than the main Jenkins instance. This prevents an attacker from loading dynamically generated JavaScript resources containing the CSRF token from a co-hosted page.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Sept 2026 · Last source change 17 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC · CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-03
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-70115
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD awaiting enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    See the vendor and CVE records for the affected range. · Fixed: 2.580 < *; < 2.447; 2.568.3 < 2.568.*
    After
    See the vendor and CVE records for the affected range. · Fixed: Jenkins: 2.580 < *, < 2.447, 2.568.3 < 2.568.*
    CNA ↗
  2. BlackTree coverageBlackTree article coverage changed from no BlackTree article to 1 BlackTree article.
    Before
    no BlackTree article
    After
    1 BlackTree article
    BlackTree editorial ↗
  3. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2026-70115 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2026-70115"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  4. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    CISA ADP ↗
  5. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 8.8 (CVSS 3.1 · CISA ADP · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    8.8 (CVSS 3.1 · CISA ADP · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    CISA ADP ↗
  6. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    See the vendor and CVE records for the affected range. · Fixed: 2.580 < *; 2.568.3 < 2.568.*
    After
    See the vendor and CVE records for the affected range. · Fixed: 2.580 < *; < 2.447; 2.568.3 < 2.568.*
    CNA ↗
  7. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-70115↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-84649 · cve.blacktree.nl