BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Authoritative vendor disclosure · 2026
CVE-2026-84643High confidence

automation-controller: automation-controller-container: automation-controller: missing use_role authorization on the project signature validation credential foreign key allows a project administrator to bind and use another organization's credential cross-tenant

Red Hat Product Security · automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8

5.0MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Red Hat Product Security has published authoritative product evidence for this CVE. Validate applicability and follow the linked vendor advisory while canonical CVE data is pending.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Red Hat Product Security automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-84643 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityautomation-controller: automation-controller-container: automation-controller: missing use_role authorization on the project signature validation credential foreign key allows a project administrator to bind and use another organization's credential cross-tenant
18 fixed

The vendor explicitly identifies these products or versions as containing the fix.

  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.s390x as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el9ap.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el9ap.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el9ap.s390x as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el9ap.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.7.17-1.el9ap.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.7.17-1.el9ap.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.7.17-1.el9ap.s390x as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9
  • automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.7.17-1.el9ap.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9
Summary
A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. A project has a signature validation credential foreign key used to validate signed project content. Unlike the project's SCM credential, the authorization logic does not verify that the requesting user has use permission on the referenced credential, and the API field has no validator or type restriction. An authenticated user holding only the organization project administrator role can therefore bind an arbitrary credential belonging to another organization, by its identifier, when creating or updating a project. The controller discloses that credential's name and type in the project's summary information and, during project synchronization, decrypts the bound credential and uses it in the attacker-controlled project's update, allowing a cross-tenant authorization boundary violation and information disclosure.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, refer to Ansible Automation Platform documentation.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Recommended actionScheduled

Red Hat Product Security has published authoritative product evidence for this CVE. Validate applicability and follow the linked vendor advisory while canonical CVE data is pending.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. A project has a signature validation credential foreign key used to validate signed project content. Unlike the project's SCM credential, the authorization logic does not verify that the requesting user has use permission on the referenced credential, and the API field has no validator or type restriction. An authenticated user holding only the organization project administrator role can therefore bind an arbitrary credential belonging to another organization, by its identifier, when creating or updating a project. The controller discloses that credential's name and type in the project's summary information and, during project synchronization, decrypts the bound credential and uses it in the attacker-controlled project's update, allowing a cross-tenant authorization boundary violation and information disclosure.

What

A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. A project has a signature validation credential foreign key used to validate signed project content. Unlike the project's SCM credential, the authorization logic does not verify that the requesting user has use permission on the referenced credential, and the API field has no validator or type restriction. An authenticated user holding only the organization project administrator role can therefore bind an arbitrary credential belonging to another organization, by its identifier, when creating or updating a project. The controller discloses that credential's name and type in the project's summary information and, during project synchronization, decrypts the bound credential and uses it in the attacker-controlled project's update, allowing a cross-tenant authorization boundary violation and information disclosure.

Why

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may obtain information outside the intended access boundary.

What

A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. A project has a signature validation credential foreign key used to validate signed project content. Unlike the project's SCM credential, the authorization logic does not verify that the requesting user has use permission on the referenced credential, and the API field has no validator or type restriction. An authenticated user holding only the organization project administrator role can therefore bind an arbitrary credential belonging to another organization, by its identifier, when creating or updating a project. The controller discloses that credential's name and type in the project's summary information and, during project synchronization, decrypts the bound credential and uses it in the attacker-controlled project's update, allowing a cross-tenant authorization boundary violation and information disclosure.

Why

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may obtain information outside the intended access boundary.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key → obtain information outside the intended access boundary
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-639 ↗

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key. The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
NetworkCWE-639
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3555Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (automation-controller): Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen und einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
The vendor advisory identifies this CVE but does not provide a concise affected-product range.
Fixed
Action
For details on how to apply this update, refer to Ansible Automation Platform documentation.
Workaround
No separate vendor workaround is recorded. Follow the linked advisory and validate the exact affected product and release.
Official vendor articles1 stored document

Linked articles are downloaded and versioned as source evidence. A CVE mention or approved update relationship does not, by itself, verify a fix for every product branch.

  • CVE-2026-84643 - Red Hat Customer Portal →Original publisher ↗Searchable text snapshot · Captured 26 Sep 2026CVE-2026-84643 Description A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. A project has a signature validation credential foreign key used to validate signed project content. Unlike the project's SCM credential, the authorization logic does not verify that the requesting user has use
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 23 Sept 2026 · Last source change 24 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC · CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

CVE recordRed Hat Product Security · OASIS CSAF 2.0
CVSS sourceOther authority
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
Unavailable
European sourceNo official EUVD mapping
Product sourceAuthoritative vendor CSAF advisory
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD status unavailable

Missing structured fields: official CVE record, canonical affected-version range. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    The vendor advisory identifies this CVE but does not provide a concise affected-product range. · Fixed: automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.s390x as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el8ap.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el9ap.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el9ap.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el9ap.s390x as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.6.33-1.el9ap.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.7.17-1.el9ap.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.7.17-1.el9ap.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.7.17-1.el9ap.s390x as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9; automation-controller-venv-tower-0:4.7.17-1.el9ap.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9; registry.redhat.io/ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9@sha256:0ea5754e6baa9da37abc43777bd9a05db5815454fc2949a8909a3e2aefc7a039_arm64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6; registry.redhat.io/ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9@sha256:4cf288cd1d881eb5cecff0652678d92d3415e5ce673493897236175eaad83cec_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6; registry.redhat.io/ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9@sha256:7f06ccc449fcd34a7371313cf12b920af06e706b1fa259c471b5062c21f557f3_s390x as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6; registry.redhat.io/ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9@sha256:97bc35281e7490e2a07716c8cb7738d478af88e6cdcb5afc8d32505637be9365_amd64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6; registry.redhat.io/ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9@sha256:0b4d286c39fbb3056643306df9e81c2d4727e005a551ab74c2cee0950f35bf25_amd64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7; registry.redhat.io/ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9@sha256:e0a869c7abe2af122a5fcc06b7c4d9ca3eec2693dde7b58c9b9ccea27f71dc6c_arm64 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7
    After
    The vendor advisory identifies this CVE but does not provide a concise affected-product range. · Fixed: For details on how to apply this update, refer to Ansible Automation Platform documentation.
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    Authoritative vendor CSAF advisory ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Vendor disclosed CVE identifier
Vendor remediation published
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-84643 · cve.blacktree.nl