Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- EPSS is 0.23% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceRoskus · Prospero Flow CRM
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Patch availableCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the OrderConfirmController at GET /order/confirm/{order_number} in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.15.11 allows an unauthenticated attacker to confirm any order on behalf of an authenticated user by directing them to a crafted page. Laravel's VerifyCsrfToken middleware enforces CSRF tokens only on POST, PUT, PATCH, and DELETE requests; the Route::get declaration leaves this state-changing action unprotected. Session cookies configured with SameSite=Lax are automatically included in top-level cross-site navigation, so a single link click triggers OrderConfirmController::confirm() and transitions the target order from pending to confirmed without user authorization. Because order numbers are sequential integers, an attacker can enumerate and confirm all existing orders in a single automated sweep.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the OrderConfirmController at GET /order/confirm/{order_number} in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.15.11 allows an unauthenticated attacker to confirm any order on behalf of an authenticated user by directing them to a crafted page. Laravel's VerifyCsrfToken middleware enforces CSRF tokens only on POST, PUT, PATCH, and DELETE requests; the Route::get declaration leaves this state-changing action unprotected. Session cookies configured with SameSite=Lax are automatically included in top-level cross-site navigation, so a single link click triggers OrderConfirmController::confirm() and transitions the target order from pending to confirmed without user authorization. Because order numbers are sequential integers, an attacker can enumerate and confirm all existing orders in a single automated sweep.
The application accepts a state-changing browser request without a reliable anti-forgery check.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the OrderConfirmController at GET /order/confirm/{order_number} in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.15.11 allows an unauthenticated attacker to confirm any order on behalf of an authenticated user by directing them to a crafted page. Laravel's VerifyCsrfToken middleware enforces CSRF tokens only on POST, PUT, PATCH, and DELETE requests; the Route::get declaration leaves this state-changing action unprotected. Session cookies configured with SameSite=Lax are automatically included in top-level cross-site navigation, so a single link click triggers OrderConfirmController::confirm() and transitions the target order from pending to confirmed without user authorization. Because order numbers are sequential integers, an attacker can enumerate and confirm all existing orders in a single automated sweep.
The application accepts a state-changing browser request without a reliable anti-forgery check.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 4 Sept 2026 · Last source change 4 Sept 2026, 19:31 UTC · CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.