BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-76461High confidence

Cisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection Vulnerability

Cisco · Secure Email Gateway

Official source article: Cisco CISCO-SA-ESA-INJ-2BLVGMHX ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

CISA confirms exploitation in the wild and lists 2026-09-17 as the remediation due date. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • CISA confirms exploitation in the wild.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 28.27% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Cisco Secure Email Gateway and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1.1.0 · finalCisco PSIRTCisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection Vulnerability
24 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • CSAFPID-189790
  • 13.0.0-392
  • 13.5.1-277
  • 14.0.0-698
  • 14.2.0-620
  • 13.0.5-007
  • 14.3.0-032
  • 14.2.1-020
  • 13.5.4-038
  • 15.0.0-104
  • 15.0.1-030
  • 15.5.1-055
Summary
Complete.
Remediation
Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-77625

CISA KEV mirrored by ENISA

A vulnerability in the email parsing of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation in the email parsing logic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email message that contains malicious SQL statements through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL statements, leading to command execution with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Recorded by ENISA since 14 Sep 2026. Evidence sources: cisa_kev.
ENISA score
9.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
2 linked advisory records
Explicit mitigation evidence

Only statements that explicitly mention a fix, patch, update, workaround or mitigation are shown here.

  • csaf_ncscnl · NCSC-2026-0368Kwetsbaarheid verholpen in Cisco Secure Email Gateway
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

CISA confirms exploitation in the wild and lists 2026-09-17 as the remediation due date. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

Cisco AsyncOS software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway (SEG) contains a SQL injection vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

What

Cisco AsyncOS software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway (SEG) contains a SQL injection vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

Why

Attacker-controlled data is not kept separate from SQL query syntax, allowing the intended database operation to be changed.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

Cisco AsyncOS software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway (SEG) contains a SQL injection vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

Why

Attacker-controlled data is not kept separate from SQL query syntax, allowing the intended database operation to be changed.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Confirmed in the wild

CISA added this CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on 2026-09-14.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-89 ↗

CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection'). The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkUnauthenticatedRemote code executionCWE-89CISA KEV
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-77625Known-exploited evidence recorded

A vulnerability in the email parsing of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation in the email parsing logic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email message that contains malicious SQL statements through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary SQL statements, leading to command execution with root privileges on the underlying operating system.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3353Cisco Secure Email Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Cisco Secure Email Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen – einschließlich der Ausführung von Code mit Root-Rechten –, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten offenzulegen oder zu manipulieren oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV26-921Cisco security advisory (AV26-921)

As of September 14, 2026, Cisco is affected by vulnerabilities in the following products: On September 14, 2026, Cisco stated that CVE-2026-76461 is being actively exploited.

Official advisory ↗
INCIBE-CERT · Spanish · multiples-vulnerabilidades-en-productos-de-cisco-14Múltiples vulnerabilidades en productos de Cisco

Cisco ha publicado 6 vulnerabilidades: 5 de severidad crítica y una de severidad alta que, en caso de ser explotadas, podrían permitir la ejecución remota de código con privilegios de administrador, el acceso no autorizado a recursos, path traversal, inyecciones de código, comandos o SQL, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) y denegación de servicio (DoS). Cisco ha confirmado la explotación activa de CVE-2026-76461.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1175Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Cisco

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Cisco. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une injection SQL (SQLi). Cisco indique que la vulnérabilité CVE-2026-76461 est activement exploitée.

Official advisory ↗
NBSZ-NKI · Hungarian · cve-2026-76461CVE-2026-76461

A program nem, vagy helytelenül semlegesíti azokat az elemeket a bemenetből, melyek módosíthatják a tervezett SQL parancsot, amikor az a szerver komponensnek kerül elküldésre.

Official advisory ↗
CSIRT Italia · Italian · cisco-sfuttamento-in-rete-della-cve-2026-76461-relativa-a-secure-email-gatewayCisco: sfuttamento in rete della CVE-2026-76461 relativa a Secure Email Gateway

La vulnerabilità identificata tramite la CVE-2026-76461, di tipo " Remote Code Execution ", e con CVSS 3.1 pari a 9.8, interessa il software Cisco AsyncOS per Cisco Secure Email Gateway. Tale vulnerabilità è dovuta a un'errata convalida di parametri di input nella logica di gestione del parsing dei messaggi di posta elettronica. Un attaccante remoto non autenticato potrebbe sfruttare tale vulnerabilità per inviare messaggi di posta elettronica opportunamente predisposti al dispositivo interessato al fine di eseguire istruzioni SQL arbitrarie e ottenere l'esecuzione di comandi con privilegi di root sul sistema operativo sottostante.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-033728シスコシステムズのAsyncOSにおけるSQL インジェクションの脆弱性

Cisco Secure Email Gateway向けCisco AsyncOSソフトウェアのメール解析における脆弱性により、認証されていないリモートの攻撃者が、基盤となるオペレーティングシステム上でルート権限を持つ任意のコマンドを実行できる可能性があります。この脆弱性は、メール解析ロジックにおける検証不足が原因です。攻撃者は、悪意のあるSQL文を含む細工されたメールメッセージを影響を受けるデバイスに送信することで、この脆弱性を悪用できます。攻撃に成功すると、攻撃者は任意のSQL文を実行でき、それによって基盤となるオペレーティングシステム上でルート権限を持つコマンドを実行できる状態になります。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6960Cisco 제품 보안 업데이트 권고

Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway에서 발생하는 SQL Injection 취약점(CVE-2026-76461) [2][4]

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6956美 CISA 발표 주요 Exploit 정보공유(Update. 2026-09-14)

Cisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection Vulnerability

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0368Kwetsbaarheid verholpen in Cisco Secure Email Gateway

A vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands and SQL statements with root privileges via crafted email parsing exploits due to insufficient validation.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Sept 2026 · Last source change 18 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC · CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-15
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-77625
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Cisco PSIRT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Cisco PSIRT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX; removed patch: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX; removed remediation: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX.
    Before
    patch: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX · remediation: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX
    After
    vendor advisory: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX
    psirt@cisco.com ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: removed remediation: cyber.gc.ca/cisco-security-advisory-av26-921.
    Before
    remediation: cyber.gc.ca/cisco-security-advisory-av26-921 · vendor advisory: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX
    After
    vendor advisory: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX
    psirt@cisco.com ↗
  3. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Mitigation available to Awaiting fix.
    Before
    Mitigation available
    After
    Awaiting fix
    psirt@cisco.com ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Cisco PSIRT ↗
  5. BlackTree coverageBlackTree article coverage changed from no BlackTree article to 1 BlackTree article.
    Before
    no BlackTree article
    After
    1 BlackTree article
    BlackTree editorial ↗
  6. ENISA known-exploited stateENISA EUVD now records this CVE in its known-exploited dataset.
    Before
    not listed in ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset
    After
    listed in ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset (EUVD-2026-77625)
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  7. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2026-77625 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2026-77625"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  8. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX.
    Before
    no authoritative guidance recorded
    After
    vendor advisory: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-esa-inj-2bLVGmhX
    psirt@cisco.com ↗
  9. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ↗
  10. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
  11. CISA KEV stateCISA KEV now confirms exploitation in the wild.
    Before
    not listed in CISA KEV
    After
    listed in CISA KEV since 2026-09-14
    CISA KEV ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-76461 · cve.blacktree.nl