BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-76259High confidence

Improper Privilege Management on the Management Port in Splunk Enterprise for Windows

Splunk · Splunk Enterprise

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 27 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Splunk Splunk Enterprise and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-63111

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In Splunk Enterprise for Windows versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, 9.4.13, and 9.3.14, a local user with access to the Windows host could bind to the management port before Splunk Enterprise starts, intercept authentication tokens from child processes, and use those tokens to compromise all relevant data and system integrity available to the user account running Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because the Windows management-port listener does not apply exclusive address binding protections before the service starts.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
8.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In Splunk Enterprise for Windows versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, 9.4.13, and 9.3.14, a local user with access to the Windows host could bind to the management port before Splunk Enterprise starts, intercept authentication tokens from child processes, and use those tokens to compromise all relevant data and system integrity available to the user account running Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because the Windows management-port listener does not apply exclusive address binding protections before the service starts.

What

In Splunk Enterprise for Windows versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, 9.4.13, and 9.3.14, a local user with access to the Windows host could bind to the management port before Splunk Enterprise starts, intercept authentication tokens from child processes, and use those tokens to compromise all relevant data and system integrity available to the user account running Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because the Windows management-port listener does not apply exclusive address binding protections before the service starts.

Why

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In Splunk Enterprise for Windows versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, 9.4.13, and 9.3.14, a local user with access to the Windows host could bind to the management port before Splunk Enterprise starts, intercept authentication tokens from child processes, and use those tokens to compromise all relevant data and system integrity available to the user account running Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because the Windows management-port listener does not apply exclusive address binding protections before the service starts.

Why

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Privilege Management → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-269 ↗

CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
CWE-269
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-63111Official EUVD mapping

In Splunk Enterprise for Windows versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, 9.4.13, and 9.3.14, a local user with access to the Windows host could bind to the management port before Splunk Enterprise starts, intercept authentication tokens from child processes, and use those tokens to compromise all relevant data and system integrity available to the user account running Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because the Windows management-port listener does not apply exclusive address binding protections before the service starts.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2929Splunk Splunk Enterprise: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Splunk Splunk Enterprise ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Berechtigungen zu erweitern, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, SQL-Injection-, serverseitige Request-Forgery- und Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen, sensible Informationen offenzulegen oder zu manipulieren, Denial-of-Service-Zustände auszulösen oder andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260826Security Bulletin 26 Aug 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 26 Aug 2026, published on 26 August 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1056Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

rd?id=CVE-2026-7383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76254 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76259 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76263 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76311 Référence CVE CVE-2026-76312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CSIRT Italia · Italian · vulnerabilita-in-prodotti-splunk-5Vulnerabilità in prodotti Splunk

nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76331 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76330 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76325 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76321 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76319 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76317 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76316 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76315 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76314 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76313 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76312 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76311 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76310 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76262 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76259 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76254 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76253 : apre una nuova finestra - - CVE-2026-76251 : apre una nuova finestra - - Riferimenti (4) https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0801 https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0807 https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0804 https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0808 Change log Titolo della tabella Versione Note Data 1.0 Pubblicato il 20-08-2026 20/08/2026 Impatto sistemico Alto (65.89) Argomenti Splunk Splunk Enterprise Splunk SOAR Splunk Enterprise Security Cisco Talos Intelligence for Enterprise Security Cloud Splun

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-029344Splunkにおける権限管理に関する脆弱性

Windows版Splunk Enterpriseのバージョン10.4.2未満、10.2.6未満、10.0.9未満、9.4.13未満、および9.3.14未満において、Windowsホストにアクセス可能なローカルユーザーが、Splunk Enterpriseの起動前に管理ポートにバインドし、子プロセスから認証トークンを傍受することが可能です。これにより、これらのトークンを使用してSplunk Enterpriseを実行しているユーザーアカウントで利用可能な関連するすべてのデータやシステムの整合性を侵害する恐れがあります。この脆弱性は、Windowsの管理ポートリスナーがサービス開始前に排他的アドレスバインディングの保護を適用しないために発生します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0322Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Splunk Enterprise door Splunk

A vulnerability in certain versions of Splunk Enterprise for Windows allows a local user to intercept authentication tokens via the management port listener before the service starts, risking data and system integrity compromise.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Splunk Enterprise: 10.4 < 10.4.2, 10.2 < 10.2.6, 10.0 < 10.0.9, 9.4 < 9.4.13, 9.3 < 9.3.14
Fixed
Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to versions 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, or higher.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Aug 2026 · Last source change 27 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC · CWE-269 · Improper Privilege Management

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-23
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-63111
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: advisory.splunk.com/SVD-2026-0801.
    Before
    no authoritative guidance recorded
    After
    vendor advisory: advisory.splunk.com/SVD-2026-0801
    psirt@cisco.com ↗
  2. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-76259 · cve.blacktree.nl