BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-75538High confidence

A Signed Length Overflow in Erlang/OTP's inet TCP Driver Overflows the Receive Buffer Into BEAM VM Memory From an Unauthenticated Peer

Erlang · OTP

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-8M6R-2PJ2-25PM ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

8.2HighCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.85% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Erlang OTP and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceerlangAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceerlangAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceerlangVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:29.0.6+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceerlangVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:29.0.6+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveerlangVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.1:25.3.2.8+dfsg-1ubuntu4.7Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-75538 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityerlang: Erlang/OTP: Remote denial of service via signed length overflow in TCP driver
84 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • erlang-asn1 as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-compiler as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-cosEvent as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-cosEventDomain as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-cosFileTransfer as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-cosNotification as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-cosProperty as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-cosTime as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-cosTransactions as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-crypto as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-diameter as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
  • erlang-edoc as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens)
Summary
A flaw was found in Erlang/OTP. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit a signed length overflow vulnerability in the `inet` TCP driver when operating in `{packet,4}` mode. By sending a specially crafted packet, the attacker can cause an incorrect packet length calculation, leading to a buffer overflow of the receive buffer into the virtual machine (VM) allocator area. This can corrupt memory and most likely result in a denial of service (DoS) due to the BEAM VM crashing.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://images.redhat.com/
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-69242

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

An attacker that connects to an open Erlang TCP port that uses the inet driver with {packet,4} mode can use a signed overflow in an incorrect packet length calculation to overflow the receive buffer into the VM allocator area and beyond up to about 2 GB. This would easily trash the allocated block's allocator metadata footer, and the next block, if any, and most likely cause the BEAM VM to crash. Utilizing this with precision enough to achieve Remote Code Execution would be extremely unfeasible. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to erts from 6.0 before 15.2.7.13, from 16.0 before 16.4.0.6, and from 17.0 before 17.0.6. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to erts before 6.0, is affected is unknown.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
8.2 · CVSS 4.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

An attacker that connects to an open Erlang TCP port that uses the inet driver with {packet,4} mode can use a signed overflow in an incorrect packet length calculation to overflow the receive buffer into the VM allocator area and beyond up to about 2 GB. This would easily trash the allocated block's allocator metadata footer, and the next block, if any, and most likely cause the BEAM VM to crash. Utilizing this with precision enough to achieve Remote Code Execution would be extremely unfeasible. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to erts from 6.0 before 15.2.7.13, from 16.0 before 16.4.0.6, and from 17.0 before 17.0.6. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to erts before 6.0, is affected is unknown.

What

An attacker that connects to an open Erlang TCP port that uses the inet driver with {packet,4} mode can use a signed overflow in an incorrect packet length calculation to overflow the receive buffer into the VM allocator area and beyond up to about 2 GB. This would easily trash the allocated block's allocator metadata footer, and the next block, if any, and most likely cause the BEAM VM to crash. Utilizing this with precision enough to achieve Remote Code Execution would be extremely unfeasible. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to erts from 6.0 before 15.2.7.13, from 16.0 before 16.4.0.6, and from 17.0 before 17.0.6. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to erts before 6.0, is affected is unknown.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

An attacker that connects to an open Erlang TCP port that uses the inet driver with {packet,4} mode can use a signed overflow in an incorrect packet length calculation to overflow the receive buffer into the VM allocator area and beyond up to about 2 GB. This would easily trash the allocated block's allocator metadata footer, and the next block, if any, and most likely cause the BEAM VM to crash. Utilizing this with precision enough to achieve Remote Code Execution would be extremely unfeasible. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to erts from 6.0 before 15.2.7.13, from 16.0 before 16.4.0.6, and from 17.0 before 17.0.6. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to erts before 6.0, is affected is unknown.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATPresentAttack requirements: A particular deployment or execution condition must be present.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VAHighVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkUnauthenticatedRemote code executionDenial of serviceCWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-69242Official EUVD mapping

An attacker that connects to an open Erlang TCP port that uses the inet driver with {packet,4} mode can use a signed overflow in an incorrect packet length calculation to overflow the receive buffer into the VM allocator area and beyond up to about 2 GB. This would easily trash the allocated block's allocator metadata footer, and the next block, if any, and most likely cause the BEAM VM to crash. Utilizing this with precision enough to achieve Remote Code Execution would be extremely unfeasible. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to erts from 6.0 before 15.2.7.13, from 16.0 before 16.4.0.6, and from 17.0 before 17.0.6. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to erts before 6.0, is affected is unknown.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3146Erlang/OTP: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Erlang/OTP ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.

Official advisory ↗
CSIRT Italia · Italian · otp-3Rilevate vulnerabilità in Erlang/OTP

Rilevate molteplici vulnerabilità di sicurezza, di cui 11 con gravità "alta", in diversi componenti di Erlang/OTP, piattaforma open source basata sul linguaggio Erlang e sul relativo set di librerie OTP, utilizzata per lo sviluppo di sistemi distribuiti ad alta disponibilità.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Sept 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 01:10 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-02
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-69242
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    < 17.0; 17.0 < 27.3.4.17; 28.0 < 28.5.0.6; 29.0 < 29.0.6; < 6.0; 6.0 < 15.2.7.13; 16.0 < 16.4.0.6; 17.0 < 17.0.6 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    < 17.0; 17.0 < 27.3.4.17; 28.0 < 28.5.0.6; 29.0 < 29.0.6; < 6.0; 6.0 < 15.2.7.13; 16.0 < 16.4.0.6; 17.0 < 17.0.6 · Fixed: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://images.redhat.com/
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-75538 to remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-75538.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-75538
    After
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-75538
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  3. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  4. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    erlang27.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
    After
    erlang-asn1 as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-compiler as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-cosEvent as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-cosEventDomain as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-cosFileTransfer as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-cosNotification as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-cosProperty as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-cosTime as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-cosTransactions as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-crypto as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-diameter as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-edoc as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-eldap as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-erl_docgen as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-erl_interface as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-erts as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-eunit as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-ftp as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-hipe as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-ic as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-inets as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-kernel as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-mnesia as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-odbc as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-orber as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-os_mon as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-ose as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-otp_mibs as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-parsetools as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); erlang-percept as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens); and 54 more · Fixed: erlang27-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-asn1-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-asn1-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-common_test-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-common_test-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-compiler-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-compiler-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-crypto-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-crypto-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-debugger-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-debugger-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-dialyzer-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-dialyzer-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-diameter-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-diameter-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-edoc-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-edoc-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-eldap-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-eldap-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-erl_interface-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-erl_interface-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-erts-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-erts-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-et-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-et-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-eunit-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-eunit-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; erlang27-examples-0:27.3.4.17-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; and 49 more
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  5. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2026-69242 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2026-69242"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  6. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-75538 · cve.blacktree.nl