BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-74482High confidence

mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 252 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 17 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 252 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.105-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.187-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinux-6.12Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.107-1~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-74482 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 15 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-74482
282 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios __folio_split() keeps dereferencing the mapping after the split: shmem_uncharge(mapping->host) and remap_page() while the folios are still frozen/locked, and i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping) at the very end, after the after-split folios have been unlocked and freed. Nothing holds an inode reference across that. The split relies on @folio -- which the beyond-EOF drop loop never removes, as it starts at folio_next(folio) -- staying locked and in the page cache to hold off eviction. But the unlock loop unlocks @folio before i_mmap_unlock_read() runs. If the caller's @lock_at is a tail beyond EOF, as memory_failure() passes when splitting a poisoned tail of a shmem THP that reaches past i_size during truncation, it too is gone from the page cache; so once @folio is unlocked no locked, in-cache folio pins the inode, and a concurrent final iput() can evict and RCU-free it before i_mmap_unlock_read() touches i_mmap_rwsem: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0x634/0x790 i_mmap_unlock_read include/linux/fs.h:537 [inline] __folio_split+0x732/0x1640 mm/huge_memory.c:4100 try_to_split_thp_page+0xab/0x390 mm/memory-failure.c:1675 memory_failure+0x1394/0x26e0 mm/memory-failure.c:2470 Freed by task 4601: shmem_free_in_core_inode+0x54/0xb0 mm/shmem.c:5177 evict+0x57f/0xac0 fs/inode.c:870 Do every mapping dereference while @folio still pins the inode: drop i_mmap_rwsem right after remap_page(), before the loop that unlocks and frees the after-split folios, and clear @mapping so the exit path does not unlock it again. shmem_uncharge() and remap_page() already run before that point, so after this nothing past the unlock loop touches the inode or the mapping. This is now a rule the split depends on, alongside keeping @folio frozen until the page cache is updated: no inode or mapping dereference once the after-split folios start being unlocked.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2026-74482 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios
232 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's huge memory management (mm/huge_memory). A race condition exists in the `__folio_split()` function where the `i_mmap_rwsem` lock is released prematurely before all after-split folios are fully processed. This allows a concurrent operation to free the inode while subsequent memory management operations attempt to access it, leading to a use-after-free vulnerability. This can result in system instability or a denial of service.
Remediation
Fix deferred
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-59675

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios __folio_split() keeps dereferencing the mapping after the split: shmem_uncharge(mapping->host) and remap_page() while the folios are still frozen/locked, and i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping) at the very end, after the after-split folios have been unlocked and freed. Nothing holds an inode reference across that. The split relies on @folio -- which the beyond-EOF drop loop never removes, as it starts at folio_next(folio) -- staying locked and in the page cache to hold off eviction. But the unlock loop unlocks @folio before i_mmap_unlock_read() runs. If the caller's @lock_at is a tail beyond EOF, as memory_failure() passes when splitting a poisoned tail of a shmem THP that reaches past i_size during truncation, it too is gone from the page cache; so once @folio is unlocked no locked, in-cache folio pins the inode, and a concurrent final iput() can evict and RCU-free it before i_mmap_unlock_read() touches i_mmap_rwsem: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0x634/0x790 i_mmap_unlock_read include/linux/fs.h:537 [inline] __folio_split+0x732/0x1640 mm/huge_memory.c:4100 try_to_split_thp_page+0xab/0x390 mm/memory-failure.c:1675 memory_failure+0x1394/0x26e0 mm/memory-failure.c:2470 Freed by task 4601: shmem_free_in_core_inode+0x54/0xb0 mm/shmem.c:5177 evict+0x57f/0xac0 fs/inode.c:870 Do every mapping dereference while @folio still pins the inode: drop i_mmap_rwsem right after remap_page(), before the loop that unlocks and frees the after-split folios, and clear @mapping so the exit path does not unlock it again. shmem_uncharge() and remap_page() already run before that point, so after this nothing past the unlock loop touches the inode or the mapping. This is now a rule the split depends on, alongside keeping @folio frozen until the page cache is updated: no inode or mapping dereference once the after-split folios start being unlocked.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 252 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios __folio_split() keeps dereferencing the mapping after the split: shmem_uncharge(mapping->host) and remap_page() while the folios are still frozen/locked, and i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping) at the very end, after the after-split folios have been unlocked and freed. Nothing holds an inode reference across that. The split relies on @folio -- which the beyond-EOF drop loop never removes, as it starts at folio_next(folio) -- staying locked and in the page cache to hold off eviction. But the unlock loop unlocks @folio before i_mmap_unlock_read() runs. If the caller's @lock_at is a tail beyond EOF, as memory_failure() passes when splitting a poisoned tail of a shmem THP that reaches past i_size during truncation, it too is gone from the page cache; so once @folio is unlocked no locked, in-cache folio pins the inode, and a concurrent final iput() can evict and RCU-free it before i_mmap_unlock_read() touches i_mmap_rwsem: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0x634/0x790 i_mmap_unlock_read include/linux/fs.h:537 [inline] __folio_split+0x732/0x1640 mm/huge_memory.c:4100 try_to_split_thp_page+0xab/0x390 mm/memory-failure.c:1675 memory_failure+0x1394/0x26e0 mm/memory-failure.c:2470 Freed by task 4601: shmem_free_in_core_inode+0x54/0xb0 mm/shmem.c:5177 evict+0x57f/0xac0 fs/inode.c:870 Do every mapping dereference while @folio still pins the inode: drop i_mmap_rwsem right after remap_page(), before the loop that unlocks and frees the after-split folios, and clear @mapping so the exit path does not unlock it again. shmem_uncharge() and remap_page() already run before that point, so after this nothing past the unlock loop touches the inode or the mapping. This is now a rule the split depends on, alongside keeping @folio frozen until the page cache is updated: no inode or mapping dereference once the after-split folios start being unlocked.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios __folio_split() keeps dereferencing the mapping after the split: shmem_uncharge(mapping->host) and remap_page() while the folios are still frozen/locked, and i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping) at the very end, after the after-split folios have been unlocked and freed. Nothing holds an inode reference across that. The split relies on @folio -- which the beyond-EOF drop loop never removes, as it starts at folio_next(folio) -- staying locked and in the page cache to hold off eviction. But the unlock loop unlocks @folio before i_mmap_unlock_read() runs. If the caller's @lock_at is a tail beyond EOF, as memory_failure() passes when splitting a poisoned tail of a shmem THP that reaches past i_size during truncation, it too is gone from the page cache; so once @folio is unlocked no locked, in-cache folio pins the inode, and a concurrent final iput() can evict and RCU-free it before i_mmap_unlock_read() touches i_mmap_rwsem: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0x634/0x790 i_mmap_unlock_read include/linux/fs.h:537 [inline] __folio_split+0x732/0x1640 mm/huge_memory.c:4100 try_to_split_thp_page+0xab/0x390 mm/memory-failure.c:1675 memory_failure+0x1394/0x26e0 mm/memory-failure.c:2470 Freed by task 4601: shmem_free_in_core_inode+0x54/0xb0 mm/shmem.c:5177 evict+0x57f/0xac0 fs/inode.c:870 Do every mapping dereference while @folio still pins the inode: drop i_mmap_rwsem right after remap_page(), before the loop that unlocks and frees the after-split folios, and clear @mapping so the exit path does not unlock it again. shmem_uncharge() and remap_page() already run before that point, so after this nothing past the unlock loop touches the inode or the mapping. This is now a rule the split depends on, alongside keeping @folio frozen until the page cache is updated: no inode or mapping dereference once the after-split folios start being unlocked.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios __folio_split() keeps dereferencing the mapping after the split: shmem_uncharge(mapping->host) and remap_page() while the folios are still frozen/locked, and i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping) at the very end, after the after-split folios have been unlocked and freed. Nothing holds an inode reference across that. The split relies on @folio -- which the beyond-EOF drop loop never removes, as it starts at folio_next(folio) -- staying locked and in the page cache to hold off eviction. But the unlock loop unlocks @folio before i_mmap_unlock_read() runs. If the caller's @lock_at is a tail beyond EOF, as memory_failure() passes when splitting a poisoned tail of a shmem THP that reaches past i_size during truncation, it too is gone from the page cache; so once @folio is unlocked no locked, in-cache folio pins the inode, and a concurrent final iput() can evict and RCU-free it before i_mmap_unlock_read() touches i_mmap_rwsem: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0x634/0x790 i_mmap_unlock_read include/linux/fs.h:537 [inline] __folio_split+0x732/0x1640 mm/huge_memory.c:4100 try_to_split_thp_page+0xab/0x390 mm/memory-failure.c:1675 memory_failure+0x1394/0x26e0 mm/memory-failure.c:2470 Freed by task 4601: shmem_free_in_core_inode+0x54/0xb0 mm/shmem.c:5177 evict+0x57f/0xac0 fs/inode.c:870 Do every mapping dereference while @folio still pins the inode: drop i_mmap_rwsem right after remap_page(), before the loop that unlocks and frees the after-split folios, and clear @mapping so the exit path does not unlock it again. shmem_uncharge() and remap_page() already run before that point, so after this nothing past the unlock loop touches the inode or the mapping. This is now a rule the split depends on, alongside keeping @folio frozen until the page cache is updated: no inode or mapping dereference once the after-split folios start being unlocked.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-59675Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: unlock i_mmap_rwsem before releasing after-split folios __folio_split() keeps dereferencing the mapping after the split: shmem_uncharge(mapping->host) and remap_page() while the folios are still frozen/locked, and i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping) at the very end, after the after-split folios have been unlocked and freed. Nothing holds an inode reference across that. The split relies on @folio -- which the beyond-EOF drop loop never removes, as it starts at folio_next(folio) -- staying locked and in the page cache to hold off eviction. But the unlock loop unlocks @folio before i_mmap_unlock_read() runs. If the caller's @lock_at is a tail beyond EOF, as memory_failure() passes when splitting a poisoned tail of a shmem THP that reaches past i_size during truncation, it too is gone from the page cache; so once @folio is unlocked no locked, in-cache folio pins the inode, and a concurrent final iput() can evict and RCU-free it before i_mmap_unlock_read() touches i_mmap_rwsem: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0x634/0x790 i_mmap_unlock_read include/linux/fs.h:537 [inline] __folio_split+0x732/0x1640 mm/huge_memory.c:4100 try_to_split_thp_page+0xab/0x390 mm/memory-failure.c:1675 memory_failure+0x1394/0x26e0 mm/memory-failure.c:2470 Freed by task 4601: shmem_free_in_core_inode+0x54/0xb0 mm/shmem.c:5177 evict+0x57f/0xac0 fs/inode.c:870 Do every mapping dereference while @folio still pins the inode: drop i_mmap_rwsem right after remap_page(), before the loop that unlocks and frees the after-split folios, and clear @mapping so the exit path does not unlock it again. shmem_uncharge() and remap_page() already run before that point, so after this nothing past the unlock loop touches the inode or the mapping. This is now a rule the split depends on, alongside keeping @folio frozen until the page cache is updated: no inode or mapping dereference once the after-split folios start being unlocked.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2852Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um root Rechte zu erlangen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-74395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74481 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74513 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74517 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1232Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-74472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74481 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74484 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74487 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1231Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-74382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74388 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74390 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74416 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74417 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74454 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-74318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74454 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74481 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1163Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-74471 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74481 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74487 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-74318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74454 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74481 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1090Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-74472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74481 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74484 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74487 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-74493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.8, 5.10.265 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.216 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.183 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.151 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.103 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.44 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.1.8 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 15 Aug 2026 · Last source change 19 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-23
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-59675
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD received

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added remediation: git.kernel.org/bc2f5eabaaf60ec18da70b619a8fba1bfb7dea3a; removed remediation: git.kernel.org/be106f7855f03d3128ed0ce70ba74b484a90b473.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/be106f7855f03d3128ed0ce70ba74b484a90b473
    After
    remediation: git.kernel.org/bc2f5eabaaf60ec18da70b619a8fba1bfb7dea3a
    CNA ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < be106f7855f03d3128ed0ce70ba74b484a90b473; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < e3dd774dbfd0b5bc2dbd0995221751b1234f8205; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < 10065fb891651d9541e7a5a2db84c1e656ece4f9; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < d640efe94d86d3be893d4c19220362546a637e90; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < e923bd21058ea02fd0dcd3549d151d143fd036e5; 4.8 · Fixed: < 4.8; 6.6.151 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.103 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.44 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.8 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    After
    baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < bc2f5eabaaf60ec18da70b619a8fba1bfb7dea3a; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < f87c08060818ebb19bafed37c38244538da25097; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < 6f5c272d71845a669e4c8ee5c72b376e29a0e6e5; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < be106f7855f03d3128ed0ce70ba74b484a90b473; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < e3dd774dbfd0b5bc2dbd0995221751b1234f8205; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < 10065fb891651d9541e7a5a2db84c1e656ece4f9; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < d640efe94d86d3be893d4c19220362546a637e90; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < e923bd21058ea02fd0dcd3549d151d143fd036e5 · Fixed: < 4.8; 5.10.265 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.216 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.183 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.151 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.103 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.44 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.8 ≤ 7.1.*
    CNA ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < be106f7855f03d3128ed0ce70ba74b484a90b473; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < e3dd774dbfd0b5bc2dbd0995221751b1234f8205; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < 10065fb891651d9541e7a5a2db84c1e656ece4f9; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < d640efe94d86d3be893d4c19220362546a637e90; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < e923bd21058ea02fd0dcd3549d151d143fd036e5; 4.8 · Fixed: < 4.8; 6.6.151 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.103 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.44 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.8 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2-rc6 ≤ *
    After
    baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < be106f7855f03d3128ed0ce70ba74b484a90b473; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < e3dd774dbfd0b5bc2dbd0995221751b1234f8205; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < 10065fb891651d9541e7a5a2db84c1e656ece4f9; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < d640efe94d86d3be893d4c19220362546a637e90; baa355fd331424526e742d41d9b90d5f9d10f716 < e923bd21058ea02fd0dcd3549d151d143fd036e5; 4.8 · Fixed: < 4.8; 6.6.151 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.103 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.44 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.8 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
  4. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    CNA ↗
  5. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.8 (CVSS 3.1 · CNA · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.8 (CVSS 3.1 · CNA · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    CNA ↗
  6. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-59675↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-74482 · cve.blacktree.nl