BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-73626High confidence

JupyterLab before 4.6.2 Authentication Bypass via PyPIExtensionManager

jupyterlab · jupyterlab

7.7HighCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-73626 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityjupyterlab: JupyterLab: Extension allowlist bypass allows unauthorized installations
17 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • mta/mta-solution-server-rhel9 as a component of Migration Toolkit for Applications 8
  • rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch210-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-th06-cuda130-torch210-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-th06-cuda130-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-th06-rocm64-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-cpu-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-rocm-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
Summary
A flaw was found in JupyterLab where a missing 'await' in the `PyPIExtensionManager.install()` function could lead to an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap. This vulnerability allows direct callers of `install()` to bypass security checks, potentially enabling the installation of unauthorized extensions. This issue affects deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration calls `install()` directly with untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, and the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled.
Remediation
Fix deferred
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-57795

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

JupyterLab versions >=4.6.0,<=4.6.1 and <=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing 'await' caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.7 · CVSS 4.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

JupyterLab versions >=4.6.0,<=4.6.1 and <=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing 'await' caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.

What

JupyterLab versions >=4.6.0,<=4.6.1 and <=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing 'await' caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.

Why

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

JupyterLab versions >=4.6.0,<=4.6.1 and <=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing 'await' caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.

Why

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Access Control → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-284 ↗

CWE-284: Improper Access Control. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCHighVulnerable-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a major loss.VIHighVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a major loss.VAHighVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-284
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-57795Official EUVD mapping

JupyterLab versions >=4.6.0,<=4.6.1 and <=4.5.9 contain an allowlist/blocklist enforcement gap in PyPIExtensionManager.install(). A missing 'await' caused the is_install_allowed coroutine to never execute, so the extension allowlist/blocklist check was not enforced for direct callers of install(). The stock JupyterLab HTTP API and Extension Manager UI are not affected, as they perform a separate, correctly awaited check. The issue affects only deployments where a custom extension or downstream integration imports PyPIExtensionManager and calls install() directly with a package name influenced by untrusted input, an allowlist/blocklist is configured, the PyPI Extension Manager is enabled, and kernels and terminals are disabled or delegated to remote hosts. Fixed in JupyterLab 4.6.2 and 4.5.10.

Official EUVD record ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260819Security Bulletin 19 Aug 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 19 Aug 2026, published on 19 August 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
jupyterlab: 4.6.1, 4.5.10
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Aug 2026 · Last source change 28 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC · CWE-284 · Improper Access Control

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-57795
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD awaiting enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. SeveritySeverity changed from None to High.
    Before
    None
    After
    High
    CNA ↗
  2. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from 0.0 (CVSS 4.0 · CNA · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) to 7.7 (CVSS 4.0 · CNA · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N).
    Before
    0.0 (CVSS 4.0 · CNA · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N)
    After
    7.7 (CVSS 4.0 · CNA · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N)
    CNA ↗
  3. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from authoritative remediation link to authoritative remediation link.
    Before
    authoritative remediation link
    After
    authoritative remediation link
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  4. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    After
    mta/mta-solution-server-rhel9 as a component of Migration Toolkit for Applications 8; rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch210-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cuda130-torch210-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cuda130-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-rocm64-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-cpu-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-rocm-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-rocm-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-rocm-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-57795↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-73626 · cve.blacktree.nl