BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-73621High confidence

GitPython before 3.1.56 Arbitrary File Truncation via Commit.count

gitpython-developers · GitPython

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-P538-C434-8V24 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.3MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 53 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 14 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 0.36% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs gitpython-developers GitPython and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 53 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcepython-gitAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcepython-gitAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcepython-gitVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.1.61-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcepython-gitVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.1.61-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · esm-appspython-gitUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges2 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
PyPIgitpythonECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 3.1.563.1.56OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
PyPIgitpythonECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 3.1.563.1.56OSV record ↗source linked ecosystem record · 10 Sep 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-73621 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 6 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-73621
20 recommended

The vendor recommends these product versions as the target state.

  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-TERADATA
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • python311-GitPython-3.1.34.1693646983.2a2ae77-150400.9.8.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7
  • python313-GitPython-3.1.44-160000.4.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
Summary
GitPython before 3.1.56 contains an argument injection vulnerability in the Commit.count() method, which forwards keyword arguments to 'git rev-list' without the check_unsafe_options guard present in the sibling iter_items method. An attacker who can control options passed to Commit.count (e.g., via an application that forwards a user-supplied options dict) can supply output= , causing 'git rev-list --output= ' to open and truncate the target file to zero bytes before revision parsing. This allows destruction/blanking of an arbitrary file at the process's privilege level (no content control, 0-byte truncation).
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2026-73621 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitygitpython: GitPython: Arbitrary File Truncation via Commit.count() Argument Injection
51 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • exploit-intelligence-tech-preview/vulnerability-analysis-rhel9 as a component of Exploit Intelligence
  • mta/mta-solution-server-rhel9 as a component of Migration Toolkit for Applications 8
  • pen-drive/pen-drive-scanner-rhel9 as a component of Pen Drive Powered by Red Hat Lightspeed
  • rhaiis/vllm-cpu-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat AI Inference Server
  • rhaiis/vllm-tpu-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat AI Inference Server
  • ansible-automation-platform-24/controller-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • ansible-automation-platform-24/hub-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • ansible-automation-platform-25/controller-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • ansible-automation-platform-25/hub-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
Summary
A flaw was found in GitPython. An argument injection vulnerability in the `Commit.count()` method allows an attacker to control options passed to the method. By supplying a crafted `output` option, an attacker can cause the `git rev-list` command to truncate an arbitrary file to zero bytes. This enables the destruction or blanking of files at the process's privilege level, leading to data loss.
Remediation
Fix deferred
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-57825

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 53 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

GitPython before 3.1.56 contains an argument injection vulnerability in the Commit.count() method, which forwards keyword arguments to 'git rev-list' without the check_unsafe_options guard present in the sibling iter_items method. An attacker who can control options passed to Commit.count (e.g., via an application that forwards a user-supplied options dict) can supply output=<path>, causing 'git rev-list --output=<path>' to open and truncate the target file to zero bytes before revision parsing. This allows destruction/blanking of an arbitrary file at the process's privilege level (no content control, 0-byte truncation).

What

GitPython before 3.1.56 contains an argument injection vulnerability in the Commit.count() method, which forwards keyword arguments to 'git rev-list' without the check_unsafe_options guard present in the sibling iter_items method. An attacker who can control options passed to Commit.count (e.g., via an application that forwards a user-supplied options dict) can supply output=<path>, causing 'git rev-list --output=<path>' to open and truncate the target file to zero bytes before revision parsing. This allows destruction/blanking of an arbitrary file at the process's privilege level (no content control, 0-byte truncation).

Why

The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

GitPython before 3.1.56 contains an argument injection vulnerability in the Commit.count() method, which forwards keyword arguments to 'git rev-list' without the check_unsafe_options guard present in the sibling iter_items method. An attacker who can control options passed to Commit.count (e.g., via an application that forwards a user-supplied options dict) can supply output=<path>, causing 'git rev-list --output=<path>' to open and truncate the target file to zero bytes before revision parsing. This allows destruction/blanking of an arbitrary file at the process's privilege level (no content control, 0-byte truncation).

Why

The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-88 ↗

CWE-88: Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection'). The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VILowVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.VALowVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-88Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260819Security Bulletin 19 Aug 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 19 Aug 2026, published on 19 August 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-031952gitpython projectのgitpythonにおける引数の挿入または変更に関する脆弱性

GitPythonのバージョン3.1.56未満には、Commit.count()メソッドに引数インジェクションの脆弱性が存在します。このメソッドは、同じく存在するiter_itemsメソッドのcheck_unsafe_optionsガードなしにキーワード引数を'git rev-list'へ渡します。攻撃者は、Commit.countに渡されるオプション(例:ユーザー提供のオプション辞書を転送するアプリケーション経由)を制御できる場合、output=<パス>を指定して 'git rev-list --output=<パス>' を実行させ、対象ファイルを開いてリビジョン解析前にゼロバイトに切り詰めることが可能です。これにより、プロセスの権限レベルで任意のファイルを破壊・空白化(コンテンツの制御なしで0バイトに切り詰めること)が可能となります。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
GitPython: < 3.1.56
Fixed
GitPython: 3.1.56
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
Official vendor articles1 stored document

Linked articles are downloaded and versioned as source evidence. A CVE mention or approved update relationship does not, by itself, verify a fix for every product branch.

04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Aug 2026 · Last source change 14 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC · CWE-88 · Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-57825
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    exploit-intelligence-tech-preview/vulnerability-analysis-rhel9 as a component of Exploit Intelligence; mta/mta-solution-server-rhel9 as a component of Migration Toolkit for Applications 8; pen-drive/pen-drive-scanner-rhel9 as a component of Pen Drive Powered by Red Hat Lightspeed; rhaiis/vllm-cpu-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat AI Inference Server; rhaiis/vllm-tpu-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat AI Inference Server; ansible-automation-platform-24/controller-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-24/hub-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-25/controller-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-25/hub-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-27/hub-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; python-gitpython.src as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; rhelai3/bootc-cuda-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; rhelai3/bootc-gaudi-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; rhelai3/bootc-rocm-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; rhelai3/disk-image-cuda-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; rust.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-mlflow-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-rocm-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-rocm-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch210-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cuda130-torch210-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); and 22 more
    After
    exploit-intelligence-tech-preview/vulnerability-analysis-rhel9 as a component of Exploit Intelligence; mta/mta-solution-server-rhel9 as a component of Migration Toolkit for Applications 8; pen-drive/pen-drive-scanner-rhel9 as a component of Pen Drive Powered by Red Hat Lightspeed; rhaiis/vllm-cpu-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat AI Inference Server; rhaiis/vllm-tpu-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat AI Inference Server; ansible-automation-platform-24/controller-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-24/hub-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-25/controller-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-25/hub-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; ansible-automation-platform-27/hub-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; python-gitpython.src as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; rhelai3/bootc-cuda-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; rhelai3/bootc-gaudi-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; rhelai3/bootc-rocm-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; rhelai3/disk-image-cuda-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-mlflow-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-rocm-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-cuda-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-rocm-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch210-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cuda130-torch210-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhoai/odh-th06-cuda130-torch291-py312-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); and 21 more
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: github.com/GHSA-p538-c434-8v24.
    Before
    remediation: github.com/GHSA-p538-c434-8v24
    After
    remediation: github.com/GHSA-p538-c434-8v24 · vendor advisory: github.com/GHSA-p538-c434-8v24
    disclosure@vulncheck.com ↗
  3. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    disclosure@vulncheck.com ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-73621 · cve.blacktree.nl