Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- EPSS is 0.81% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceDokploy · dokploy
Official source article: GitHub GHSA-W6R4-F26V-8G36 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.
Critical technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Critical technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Patch availableDokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, Dokploy allows an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands on a local or SSH-connected target server because registry.testRegistry and registry.testRegistryById in apps/dokploy/server/api/routers/registry.ts interpolate the password field into an execAsyncRemote shell command instead of using safeDockerLoginCommand. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13.
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, Dokploy allows an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands on a local or SSH-connected target server because registry.testRegistry and registry.testRegistryById in apps/dokploy/server/api/routers/registry.ts interpolate the password field into an execAsyncRemote shell command instead of using safeDockerLoginCommand. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13.
Untrusted input is incorporated into an operating-system command without safe parameter handling.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, Dokploy allows an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands on a local or SSH-connected target server because registry.testRegistry and registry.testRegistryById in apps/dokploy/server/api/routers/registry.ts interpolate the password field into an execAsyncRemote shell command instead of using safeDockerLoginCommand. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13.
Untrusted input is incorporated into an operating-system command without safe parameter handling.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'). The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 10 Aug 2026 · Last source change 12 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC · CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.