Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
- EPSS is 0.51% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceDokploy · dokploy
Official source article: GitHub GHSA-899J-CJWP-V4GW ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.
Critical technical impact and a public exploit reference; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Critical technical impact and a public exploit reference; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Patch availableDokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, the local branch of /docker-container-terminal in apps/dokploy/server/wss/docker-container-terminal.ts authenticates with validateRequest but does not authorize the attacker-controlled containerId against the caller's role, organization, or service access before passing it to `docker exec`, allowing any authenticated member to obtain a root shell in arbitrary containers on a self-hosted instance. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13.
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, the local branch of /docker-container-terminal in apps/dokploy/server/wss/docker-container-terminal.ts authenticates with validateRequest but does not authorize the attacker-controlled containerId against the caller's role, organization, or service access before passing it to `docker exec`, allowing any authenticated member to obtain a root shell in arbitrary containers on a self-hosted instance. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13.
The application reaches a protected operation without first confirming that the requester is authorised.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, the local branch of /docker-container-terminal in apps/dokploy/server/wss/docker-container-terminal.ts authenticates with validateRequest but does not authorize the attacker-controlled containerId against the caller's role, organization, or service access before passing it to `docker exec`, allowing any authenticated member to obtain a root shell in arbitrary containers on a self-hosted instance. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13.
The application reaches a protected operation without first confirming that the requester is authorised.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
CISA Vulnrichment records proof-of-concept exploitation in its SSVC data. BlackTree has not independently executed or validated exploit material.
CWE-862: Missing Authorization. The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 10 Aug 2026 · Last source change 11 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC · CWE-862 · Missing Authorization
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.