BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-68425High confidence

IB/mad: Drop unmatched RMPP responses before reassembly

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 295 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.26% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 295 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.101-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.187-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinux-6.12Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.101-1~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-68425 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 12 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-68425
288 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/mad: Drop unmatched RMPP responses before reassembly Kernel-handled RMPP receive processing starts reassembly for active DATA responses before the response is matched to an outstanding send. The normal match happens later, after ib_process_rmpp_recv_wc() has either assembled a complete message or consumed the segment. That ordering lets an unsolicited response that routes to a kernel RMPP agent by the high TID bits allocate or extend RMPP receive state before the full TID and source address are checked against a real request. A reordered burst can therefore reach the receive-side insertion path even though the response would not match any send. For kernel-handled RMPP DATA responses, require the existing ib_find_send_mad() match before entering RMPP reassembly. The matcher already checks the full TID, management class and source address/GID against the agent wait, backlog and in-flight send lists. If there is no match, drop the response without creating RMPP state. This leaves the RMPP window behavior unchanged and only rejects responses that have no corresponding request.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2026-68425 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: IB/mad: Drop unmatched RMPP responses before reassembly
275 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's InfiniBand (IB) Management Datagram (mad) component. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending unsolicited Reliable Multicast Packet Protocol (RMPP) responses. This could lead to the kernel allocating or extending RMPP receive state for these unmatched responses, potentially causing resource exhaustion and a denial of service.
Remediation
Fix deferred
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-55611

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/mad: Drop unmatched RMPP responses before reassembly Kernel-handled RMPP receive processing starts reassembly for active DATA responses before the response is matched to an outstanding send. The normal match happens later, after ib_process_rmpp_recv_wc() has either assembled a complete message or consumed the segment. That ordering lets an unsolicited response that routes to a kernel RMPP agent by the high TID bits allocate or extend RMPP receive state before the full TID and source address are checked against a real request. A reordered burst can therefore reach the receive-side insertion path even though the response would not match any send. For kernel-handled RMPP DATA responses, require the existing ib_find_send_mad() match before entering RMPP reassembly. The matcher already checks the full TID, management class and source address/GID against the agent wait, backlog and in-flight send lists. If there is no match, drop the response without creating RMPP state. This leaves the RMPP window behavior unchanged and only rejects responses that have no corresponding request.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.1 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 295 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/mad: Drop unmatched RMPP responses before reassembly Kernel-handled RMPP receive processing starts reassembly for active DATA responses before the response is matched to an outstanding send. The normal match happens later, after ib_process_rmpp_recv_wc() has either assembled a complete message or consumed the segment. That ordering lets an unsolicited response that routes to a kernel RMPP agent by the high TID bits allocate or extend RMPP receive state before the full TID and source address are checked against a real request. A reordered burst can therefore reach the receive-side insertion path even though the response would not match any send. For kernel-handled RMPP DATA responses, require the existing ib_find_send_mad() match before entering RMPP reassembly. The matcher already checks the full TID, management class and source address/GID against the agent wait, backlog and in-flight send lists. If there is no match, drop the response without creating RMPP state. This leaves the RMPP window behavior unchanged and only rejects responses that have no corresponding request.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/mad: Drop unmatched RMPP responses before reassembly Kernel-handled RMPP receive processing starts reassembly for active DATA responses before the response is matched to an outstanding send. The normal match happens later, after ib_process_rmpp_recv_wc() has either assembled a complete message or consumed the segment. That ordering lets an unsolicited response that routes to a kernel RMPP agent by the high TID bits allocate or extend RMPP receive state before the full TID and source address are checked against a real request. A reordered burst can therefore reach the receive-side insertion path even though the response would not match any send. For kernel-handled RMPP DATA responses, require the existing ib_find_send_mad() match before entering RMPP reassembly. The matcher already checks the full TID, management class and source address/GID against the agent wait, backlog and in-flight send lists. If there is no match, drop the response without creating RMPP state. This leaves the RMPP window behavior unchanged and only rejects responses that have no corresponding request.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/mad: Drop unmatched RMPP responses before reassembly Kernel-handled RMPP receive processing starts reassembly for active DATA responses before the response is matched to an outstanding send. The normal match happens later, after ib_process_rmpp_recv_wc() has either assembled a complete message or consumed the segment. That ordering lets an unsolicited response that routes to a kernel RMPP agent by the high TID bits allocate or extend RMPP receive state before the full TID and source address are checked against a real request. A reordered burst can therefore reach the receive-side insertion path even though the response would not match any send. For kernel-handled RMPP DATA responses, require the existing ib_find_send_mad() match before entering RMPP reassembly. The matcher already checks the full TID, management class and source address/GID against the agent wait, backlog and in-flight send lists. If there is no match, drop the response without creating RMPP state. This leaves the RMPP window behavior unchanged and only rejects responses that have no corresponding request.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Unauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-55611Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/mad: Drop unmatched RMPP responses before reassembly Kernel-handled RMPP receive processing starts reassembly for active DATA responses before the response is matched to an outstanding send. The normal match happens later, after ib_process_rmpp_recv_wc() has either assembled a complete message or consumed the segment. That ordering lets an unsolicited response that routes to a kernel RMPP agent by the high TID bits allocate or extend RMPP receive state before the full TID and source address are checked against a real request. A reordered burst can therefore reach the receive-side insertion path even though the response would not match any send. For kernel-handled RMPP DATA responses, require the existing ib_find_send_mad() match before entering RMPP reassembly. The matcher already checks the full TID, management class and source address/GID against the agent wait, backlog and in-flight send lists. If there is no match, drop the response without creating RMPP state. This leaves the RMPP window behavior unchanged and only rejects responses that have no corresponding request.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2730Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise die Ausführung von beliebigem Code, die Ausweitung von Berechtigungen, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Manipulation von Daten oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260812Security Bulletin 12 Aug 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 12 Aug 2026, published on 12 August 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-68408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68410 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68416 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68417 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1231Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68410 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68417 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-68407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68410 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68417 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1163Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-68405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68410 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68417 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-68407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68410 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68417 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1069Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-68408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68410 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68416 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68417 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.13, 5.10.265 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.216 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.183 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.148 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.101 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.42 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.1.6 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Aug 2026 · Last source change 19 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-55611
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD received

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added remediation: git.kernel.org/45416c87ebcece1e90f3bc5bc172d106b77c6b69; removed remediation: git.kernel.org/dfa535c94406c03d3f0c869ef3ba5528e395737c.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/dfa535c94406c03d3f0c869ef3ba5528e395737c
    After
    remediation: git.kernel.org/45416c87ebcece1e90f3bc5bc172d106b77c6b69
    CNA ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < dfa535c94406c03d3f0c869ef3ba5528e395737c; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 6e1bd7f590b0ccfee07f7fe1d48b92059bd37d72; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 98d2d468b4faa1fdc68c0c6c238389906ee3490c; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < ad9c9ad3204f63a46f0f7de29687a8e512f05e29; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < d2e52d610b9b09694261632340b801a421e0b0c5; 2.6.13 · Fixed: < 2.6.13; 6.6.148 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.101 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.42 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.6 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    After
    fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 45416c87ebcece1e90f3bc5bc172d106b77c6b69; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 9634fb1f4d404f36a20ffbcb8797369db69b06bb; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < bfb9e8243fd2099d1080d09222964d988f991d9b; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < dfa535c94406c03d3f0c869ef3ba5528e395737c; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 6e1bd7f590b0ccfee07f7fe1d48b92059bd37d72; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 98d2d468b4faa1fdc68c0c6c238389906ee3490c; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < ad9c9ad3204f63a46f0f7de29687a8e512f05e29; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < d2e52d610b9b09694261632340b801a421e0b0c5 · Fixed: < 2.6.13; 5.10.265 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.216 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.183 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.148 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.101 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.42 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.6 ≤ 7.1.*
    CNA ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < dfa535c94406c03d3f0c869ef3ba5528e395737c; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 6e1bd7f590b0ccfee07f7fe1d48b92059bd37d72; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 98d2d468b4faa1fdc68c0c6c238389906ee3490c; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < ad9c9ad3204f63a46f0f7de29687a8e512f05e29; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < d2e52d610b9b09694261632340b801a421e0b0c5; 2.6.13 · Fixed: < 2.6.13; 6.6.148 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.101 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.42 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.6 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2-rc4 ≤ *
    After
    fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < dfa535c94406c03d3f0c869ef3ba5528e395737c; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 6e1bd7f590b0ccfee07f7fe1d48b92059bd37d72; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < 98d2d468b4faa1fdc68c0c6c238389906ee3490c; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < ad9c9ad3204f63a46f0f7de29687a8e512f05e29; fa619a77046bef30478697aba0553991033afb8e < d2e52d610b9b09694261632340b801a421e0b0c5; 2.6.13 · Fixed: < 2.6.13; 6.6.148 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.101 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.42 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.6 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-55611↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-68425 · cve.blacktree.nl