Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- EPSS is 0.36% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE Intelligenceopf · openproject
Official source article: GitHub GHSA-WR3W-QCHJ-P4CM ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Fix not verifiedOpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.6.0, GET /api/v3/custom_options/:id resolved CustomOption records by global numeric id and allowed UserCustomField and GroupCustomField options without checking visible(current_user), so authenticated non-admin users could enumerate sequential custom option ids and read labels belonging to admin_only user or group custom fields. This issue is fixed in 17.6.0.
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.6.0, GET /api/v3/custom_options/:id resolved CustomOption records by global numeric id and allowed UserCustomField and GroupCustomField options without checking visible(current_user), so authenticated non-admin users could enumerate sequential custom option ids and read labels belonging to admin_only user or group custom fields. This issue is fixed in 17.6.0.
The application performs an authorisation check, but it does not correctly enforce the required permission boundary.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.6.0, GET /api/v3/custom_options/:id resolved CustomOption records by global numeric id and allowed UserCustomField and GroupCustomField options without checking visible(current_user), so authenticated non-admin users could enumerate sequential custom option ids and read labels belonging to admin_only user or group custom fields. This issue is fixed in 17.6.0.
The application performs an authorisation check, but it does not correctly enforce the required permission boundary.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization. The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 30 Jul 2026 · Last source change 31 Jul 2026, 23:06 UTC · CWE-863 · Incorrect Authorization
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.