BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64467High confidence

rust_binder: use a u64 stride when cleaning up the offsets array

Linux · Linux

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 17 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-48811

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: use a u64 stride when cleaning up the offsets array Allocation's Drop walks the offsets array (binder_size_t = u64 entries), cleaning up the objects, but it used usize instead of u64 for both the stride and the per-entry read. On 64-bit kernels (usize == u64) this is harmless, but on 32-bit kernels it walks the 8-byte entries in 4-byte steps, iterating an N-entry array 2N times, and reads the always-zero high word as offset 0, cleaning up the object at offset 0 N extra times. As a result the referenced node or handle ends up with a lower reference count than it actually has (a refcount over-decrement), and binder's reference accounting is corrupted; for example, the owner can be notified of a strong reference release (BR_RELEASE) even though references still remain. Change the stride to u64, and read each entry as a u64, narrowing it to usize with try_into(). On 32-bit ARM, when this over-decrement would drive a count below zero, the driver's existing refcount guard refuses it and fires: rust_binder: Failure: refcount underflow!

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: use a u64 stride when cleaning up the offsets array Allocation's Drop walks the offsets array (binder_size_t = u64 entries), cleaning up the objects, but it used usize instead of u64 for both the stride and the per-entry read. On 64-bit kernels (usize == u64) this is harmless, but on 32-bit kernels it walks the 8-byte entries in 4-byte steps, iterating an N-entry array 2N times, and reads the always-zero high word as offset 0, cleaning up the object at offset 0 N extra times. As a result the referenced node or handle ends up with a lower reference count than it actually has (a refcount over-decrement), and binder's reference accounting is corrupted; for example, the owner can be notified of a strong reference release (BR_RELEASE) even though references still remain. Change the stride to u64, and read each entry as a u64, narrowing it to usize with try_into(). On 32-bit ARM, when this over-decrement would drive a count below zero, the driver's existing refcount guard refuses it and fires: rust_binder: Failure: refcount underflow!

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: use a u64 stride when cleaning up the offsets array Allocation's Drop walks the offsets array (binder_size_t = u64 entries), cleaning up the objects, but it used usize instead of u64 for both the stride and the per-entry read. On 64-bit kernels (usize == u64) this is harmless, but on 32-bit kernels it walks the 8-byte entries in 4-byte steps, iterating an N-entry array 2N times, and reads the always-zero high word as offset 0, cleaning up the object at offset 0 N extra times. As a result the referenced node or handle ends up with a lower reference count than it actually has (a refcount over-decrement), and binder's reference accounting is corrupted; for example, the owner can be notified of a strong reference release (BR_RELEASE) even though references still remain. Change the stride to u64, and read each entry as a u64, narrowing it to usize with try_into(). On 32-bit ARM, when this over-decrement would drive a count below zero, the driver's existing refcount guard refuses it and fires: rust_binder: Failure: refcount underflow!

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2527Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260729Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026, published on 29 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64460 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64461 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64462 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64463 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64465 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64468 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64471 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64460 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64461 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64462 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64463 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64465 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64468 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64471 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64460 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64461 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64462 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64463 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64465 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64468 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64471 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64460 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64461 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64462 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64463 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64465 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64468 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64471 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 89b8cc948dce661af87527623b3a41cdd115e2f9, eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 74920b1b4e474ba7a4de4323c0458deec49d210b, eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 803c8a9502e9b97cd6ae937618ef4a8fd6274343, 6.18
Fixed
Linux: < 6.18, 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.1.4 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jul 2026 · Last source change 17 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-48811
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD received

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 89b8cc948dce661af87527623b3a41cdd115e2f9; eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 74920b1b4e474ba7a4de4323c0458deec49d210b; eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 803c8a9502e9b97cd6ae937618ef4a8fd6274343; 6.18 · Fixed: < 6.18; 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.4 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2-rc3 ≤ *
    After
    eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 89b8cc948dce661af87527623b3a41cdd115e2f9; eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 74920b1b4e474ba7a4de4323c0458deec49d210b; eafedbc7c050c44744fbdf80bdf3315e860b7513 < 803c8a9502e9b97cd6ae937618ef4a8fd6274343; 6.18 · Fixed: < 6.18; 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.4 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64467 · cve.blacktree.nl