BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64436High confidence

net: af_key: initialize alg_key_len for IPComp states

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 17 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.96-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.180-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinux-6.12Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.100-1~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-64436 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 15 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-64436
302 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: initialize alg_key_len for IPComp states pfkey_msg2xfrm_state() handles the IPComp (SADB_X_SATYPE_IPCOMP) case by allocating x->calg and copying only the algorithm name: x->calg = kmalloc_obj(*x->calg); if (!x->calg) { err = -ENOMEM; goto out; } strcpy(x->calg->alg_name, a->name); x->props.calgo = sa->sadb_sa_encrypt; Unlike the authentication (x->aalg) and encryption (x->ealg) branches of the same function, the compression branch never initializes calg->alg_key_len. IPComp carries no key and the allocation only reserves sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) (i.e. no room for a key), so the field is left containing uninitialized slab data. calg->alg_key_len is later used as a length by xfrm_algo_clone() when an IPComp state is cloned during XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE: xfrm_state_migrate() xfrm_state_clone_and_setup() x->calg = xfrm_algo_clone(orig->calg); kmemdup(orig, xfrm_alg_len(orig)); where xfrm_alg_len() returns sizeof(*alg) + (alg_key_len + 7) / 8. With a non-zero garbage alg_key_len, kmemdup() reads past the end of the 68-byte calg object. Adding an IPComp SA via PF_KEY and then migrating it triggers (net-next, KASAN, init_on_alloc=0): BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 Read of size 4164 at addr ff11000025a74980 by task diag2/9287 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 9287 Comm: diag2 7.1.0-rc6-g903db046d557 #1 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x10e/0x1f0 print_report+0xf7/0x600 kasan_report+0xe4/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x105/0x1b0 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 xfrm_state_migrate+0x70a/0x1da0 xfrm_migrate+0x753/0x18a0 xfrm_do_migrate+0xb47/0xf10 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x411/0xb50 netlink_rcv_skb+0x158/0x420 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x71/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x584/0x850 netlink_sendmsg+0x8b0/0xdc0 ____sys_sendmsg+0x9f7/0xb90 ___sys_sendmsg+0x134/0x1d0 __sys_sendmsg+0x16d/0x220 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Allocated by task 9287: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0 pfkey_add+0x2652/0x2ea0 pfkey_process+0x6d0/0x830 pfkey_sendmsg+0x42c/0x850 __sys_sendto+0x461/0x4b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The buggy address belongs to the object at ff11000025a74980 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-96 of size 96 The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of allocated 68-byte region [ff11000025a74980, ff11000025a749c4) Depending on the uninitialized value the same field can instead request an oversized kmemdup() allocation and make the migration clone fail. The XFRM netlink path is not affected: verify_one_alg() rejects an XFRMA_ALG_COMP attribute shorter than xfrm_alg_len(), so a calg added via XFRM_MSG_NEWSA is always self-consistent. Initialize calg->alg_key_len to 0, matching the aalg/ealg branches.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-48780

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: initialize alg_key_len for IPComp states pfkey_msg2xfrm_state() handles the IPComp (SADB_X_SATYPE_IPCOMP) case by allocating x->calg and copying only the algorithm name: x->calg = kmalloc_obj(*x->calg); if (!x->calg) { err = -ENOMEM; goto out; } strcpy(x->calg->alg_name, a->name); x->props.calgo = sa->sadb_sa_encrypt; Unlike the authentication (x->aalg) and encryption (x->ealg) branches of the same function, the compression branch never initializes calg->alg_key_len. IPComp carries no key and the allocation only reserves sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) (i.e. no room for a key), so the field is left containing uninitialized slab data. calg->alg_key_len is later used as a length by xfrm_algo_clone() when an IPComp state is cloned during XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE: xfrm_state_migrate() xfrm_state_clone_and_setup() x->calg = xfrm_algo_clone(orig->calg); kmemdup(orig, xfrm_alg_len(orig)); where xfrm_alg_len() returns sizeof(*alg) + (alg_key_len + 7) / 8. With a non-zero garbage alg_key_len, kmemdup() reads past the end of the 68-byte calg object. Adding an IPComp SA via PF_KEY and then migrating it triggers (net-next, KASAN, init_on_alloc=0): BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 Read of size 4164 at addr ff11000025a74980 by task diag2/9287 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 9287 Comm: diag2 7.1.0-rc6-g903db046d557 #1 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x10e/0x1f0 print_report+0xf7/0x600 kasan_report+0xe4/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x105/0x1b0 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 xfrm_state_migrate+0x70a/0x1da0 xfrm_migrate+0x753/0x18a0 xfrm_do_migrate+0xb47/0xf10 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x411/0xb50 netlink_rcv_skb+0x158/0x420 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x71/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x584/0x850 netlink_sendmsg+0x8b0/0xdc0 ____sys_sendmsg+0x9f7/0xb90 ___sys_sendmsg+0x134/0x1d0 __sys_sendmsg+0x16d/0x220 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> Allocated by task 9287: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0 pfkey_add+0x2652/0x2ea0 pfkey_process+0x6d0/0x830 pfkey_sendmsg+0x42c/0x850 __sys_sendto+0x461/0x4b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The buggy address belongs to the object at ff11000025a74980 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-96 of size 96 The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of allocated 68-byte region [ff11000025a74980, ff11000025a749c4) Depending on the uninitialized value the same field can instead request an oversized kmemdup() allocation and make the migration clone fail. The XFRM netlink path is not affected: verify_one_alg() rejects an XFRMA_ALG_COMP attribute shorter than xfrm_alg_len(), so a calg added via XFRM_MSG_NEWSA is always self-consistent. Initialize calg->alg_key_len to 0, matching the aalg/ealg branches.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: initialize alg_key_len for IPComp states pfkey_msg2xfrm_state() handles the IPComp (SADB_X_SATYPE_IPCOMP) case by allocating x->calg and copying only the algorithm name: x->calg = kmalloc_obj(*x->calg); if (!x->calg) { err = -ENOMEM; goto out; } strcpy(x->calg->alg_name, a->name); x->props.calgo = sa->sadb_sa_encrypt; Unlike the authentication (x->aalg) and encryption (x->ealg) branches of the same function, the compression branch never initializes calg->alg_key_len. IPComp carries no key and the allocation only reserves sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) (i.e. no room for a key), so the field is left containing uninitialized slab data. calg->alg_key_len is later used as a length by xfrm_algo_clone() when an IPComp state is cloned during XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE: xfrm_state_migrate() xfrm_state_clone_and_setup() x->calg = xfrm_algo_clone(orig->calg); kmemdup(orig, xfrm_alg_len(orig)); where xfrm_alg_len() returns sizeof(*alg) + (alg_key_len + 7) / 8. With a non-zero garbage alg_key_len, kmemdup() reads past the end of the 68-byte calg object. Adding an IPComp SA via PF_KEY and then migrating it triggers (net-next, KASAN, init_on_alloc=0): BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 Read of size 4164 at addr ff11000025a74980 by task diag2/9287 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 9287 Comm: diag2 7.1.0-rc6-g903db046d557 #1 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x10e/0x1f0 print_report+0xf7/0x600 kasan_report+0xe4/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x105/0x1b0 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 xfrm_state_migrate+0x70a/0x1da0 xfrm_migrate+0x753/0x18a0 xfrm_do_migrate+0xb47/0xf10 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x411/0xb50 netlink_rcv_skb+0x158/0x420 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x71/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x584/0x850 netlink_sendmsg+0x8b0/0xdc0 ____sys_sendmsg+0x9f7/0xb90 ___sys_sendmsg+0x134/0x1d0 __sys_sendmsg+0x16d/0x220 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> Allocated by task 9287: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0 pfkey_add+0x2652/0x2ea0 pfkey_process+0x6d0/0x830 pfkey_sendmsg+0x42c/0x850 __sys_sendto+0x461/0x4b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The buggy address belongs to the object at ff11000025a74980 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-96 of size 96 The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of allocated 68-byte region [ff11000025a74980, ff11000025a749c4) Depending on the uninitialized value the same field can instead request an oversized kmemdup() allocation and make the migration clone fail. The XFRM netlink path is not affected: verify_one_alg() rejects an XFRMA_ALG_COMP attribute shorter than xfrm_alg_len(), so a calg added via XFRM_MSG_NEWSA is always self-consistent. Initialize calg->alg_key_len to 0, matching the aalg/ealg branches.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: initialize alg_key_len for IPComp states pfkey_msg2xfrm_state() handles the IPComp (SADB_X_SATYPE_IPCOMP) case by allocating x->calg and copying only the algorithm name: x->calg = kmalloc_obj(*x->calg); if (!x->calg) { err = -ENOMEM; goto out; } strcpy(x->calg->alg_name, a->name); x->props.calgo = sa->sadb_sa_encrypt; Unlike the authentication (x->aalg) and encryption (x->ealg) branches of the same function, the compression branch never initializes calg->alg_key_len. IPComp carries no key and the allocation only reserves sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) (i.e. no room for a key), so the field is left containing uninitialized slab data. calg->alg_key_len is later used as a length by xfrm_algo_clone() when an IPComp state is cloned during XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE: xfrm_state_migrate() xfrm_state_clone_and_setup() x->calg = xfrm_algo_clone(orig->calg); kmemdup(orig, xfrm_alg_len(orig)); where xfrm_alg_len() returns sizeof(*alg) + (alg_key_len + 7) / 8. With a non-zero garbage alg_key_len, kmemdup() reads past the end of the 68-byte calg object. Adding an IPComp SA via PF_KEY and then migrating it triggers (net-next, KASAN, init_on_alloc=0): BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 Read of size 4164 at addr ff11000025a74980 by task diag2/9287 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 9287 Comm: diag2 7.1.0-rc6-g903db046d557 #1 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x10e/0x1f0 print_report+0xf7/0x600 kasan_report+0xe4/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x105/0x1b0 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 xfrm_state_migrate+0x70a/0x1da0 xfrm_migrate+0x753/0x18a0 xfrm_do_migrate+0xb47/0xf10 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x411/0xb50 netlink_rcv_skb+0x158/0x420 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x71/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x584/0x850 netlink_sendmsg+0x8b0/0xdc0 ____sys_sendmsg+0x9f7/0xb90 ___sys_sendmsg+0x134/0x1d0 __sys_sendmsg+0x16d/0x220 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> Allocated by task 9287: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0 pfkey_add+0x2652/0x2ea0 pfkey_process+0x6d0/0x830 pfkey_sendmsg+0x42c/0x850 __sys_sendto+0x461/0x4b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The buggy address belongs to the object at ff11000025a74980 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-96 of size 96 The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of allocated 68-byte region [ff11000025a74980, ff11000025a749c4) Depending on the uninitialized value the same field can instead request an oversized kmemdup() allocation and make the migration clone fail. The XFRM netlink path is not affected: verify_one_alg() rejects an XFRMA_ALG_COMP attribute shorter than xfrm_alg_len(), so a calg added via XFRM_MSG_NEWSA is always self-consistent. Initialize calg->alg_key_len to 0, matching the aalg/ealg branches.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2527Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260729Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026, published on 29 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64424 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64435 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64415 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64416 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64421 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64423 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1231Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64344 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64380 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64423 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64471 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64481 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64513 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64541 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64435 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64421 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64423 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64435 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64435 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64421 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64423 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1031Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-64424 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64435 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64437 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0982Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-64420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64423 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64435 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64437 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-032016LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が解決されました。net: af_key: IPComp状態のためにalg_key_lenを初期化しなかった問題です。pfkey_msg2xfrm_state()は、IPComp (SADB_X_SATYPE_IPCOMP) の場合を処理する際に、x-＞calgを割り当ててアルゴリズム名だけをコピーしています。```x-＞calg = kmalloc_obj(*x-＞calg);if (!x-＞calg) { err = -ENOMEM; goto out;}strcpy(x-＞calg-＞alg_name, a-＞name);x-＞props.calgo = sa-＞sadb_sa_encrypt;```同じ関数内の認証(x-＞aalg)および暗号化(x-＞ealg)のブランチとは異なり、圧縮ブランチはcalg-＞alg_key_lenを初期化していませんでした。IPCompはキーを持たず、割り当てるのはsizeof(struct xfrm_algo)のみ（キー領域なし）であるため、このフィールドは初期化されていないスラブデータのまま残っていました。calg-＞alg_key_lenは、XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE中にIPComp状態のクローン作成時にxfrm_algo_clone()で長さとして用いられます。```xfrm_state_migrate() xfrm_state_clone_and_setup() x-＞calg = xfrm_algo_clone(orig-＞calg); kmemdup(orig, xfrm_alg_len(orig));```ここでxfrm_alg_len()は sizeof(*alg) + (alg_key_len + 7) / 8 を返します。初期化されていない（ゴミ値の）alg_key_lenが非ゼロの場合、kmemdup()は68バイトのcalgオブジェクトの末尾を越えて読み込みます。PF_KEY経由でIPComp SAを追加し、それを移行すると(net-next, KASAN, init_on_alloc=0環境下で)以下のようなバグが発生します。```BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60Read of size 4164 at addr ff11000025a74980 by task diag2/9287CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 9287 Comm: diag2 7.1.0-rc6-g903db046d557 #1Call Trace: ＜TASK＞ dump_stack_lvl+0x10e/0x1f0 print_report+0xf7/0x600 kasan_report+0xe4/0x120 kasan_check_range+0x105/0x1b0 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 kmemdup_noprof+0x44/0x60 xfrm_state_migrate+0x70a/0x1da0 xfrm_migrate+0x753/0x18a0 xfrm_do_migrate+0xb47/0xf10 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x411/0xb50 netlink_rcv_skb+0x158/0x420 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x71/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x584/0x850 netlink_sendmsg+0x8b0/0xdc0 ____sys_sendmsg+0x9f7/0xb90 ___sys_sendmsg+0x134/0x1d0 __sys_sendmsg+0x16d/0x220 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f＜/TASK＞アロケート元タスク9287: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0 pfkey_add+0x2652/0x2ea0 pfkey_process+0x6d0/0x830 pfkey_sendmsg+0x42c/0x850 __sys_sendto+0x461/0x4b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x116/0x7d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f```問題のアドレスはオブジェクトff11000025a74980に属し、これはサイズ96のkmalloc-96キャッシュのものです。問題のアドレスは割り当てられた68バイト領域[ff11000025a74980, ff11000025a749c4)の先頭0バイトの位置にあります。未初期化の値によっては、同じフィールドが過剰なkmemdup()の割り当てを要求し、移行クローンを失敗させることもあります。XFRMのnetlink経路には影響はありません。verify_one_alg()関数はxfrm_alg_len()より短いXFRMA_ALG_COMP属性を拒否するため、XFRM_MSG_NEWSA経由で追加されたcalgは常に自己整合性があります。これらを踏まえ、calg-＞alg_key_lenを0で初期化し、aalgおよびealgのブランチに合わせました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.21, 5.10.261 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.212 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.178 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.145 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.96 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.1.4 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jul 2026 · Last source change 17 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-48780
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: git.kernel.org/01b9115b55018123ef2449ac4951f89147a8428e; added patch: git.kernel.org/273c06b81d2e902b21acc801ae18c8276c8a9b69; 6 further additions.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/58e82fc3dedb57b1432292504415b224fd2d6acb
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/01b9115b55018123ef2449ac4951f89147a8428e · patch: git.kernel.org/273c06b81d2e902b21acc801ae18c8276c8a9b69 · patch: git.kernel.org/3f63d1752d90c0e28be931a48ab5d89bc97d637d · 6 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-48780↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64436 · cve.blacktree.nl