BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64362High confidence

HID: lg-g15: cancel pending work on remove to fix a use-after-free

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 252 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 17 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 252 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.96-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.180-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinux-6.12Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.100-1~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-64362 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-64362
151 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: lg-g15: cancel pending work on remove to fix a use-after-free lg_g15_data is allocated with devm and holds a work item. The report handlers schedule that work straight from device input. lg_g15_event() and lg_g15_v2_event() do it on the backlight cycle key, and lg_g510_leds_event() does it too. The worker dereferences the lg_g15_data back through container_of. The driver had no remove callback and never cancelled the work. So if a report scheduled the work and the keyboard was then unplugged, devres freed lg_g15_data while the work was still pending or running, and the worker touched freed memory. This is a use-after-free. It is reachable as a race on device unplug. Add a remove callback that cancels the work before devres frees the state. g15->work is only initialized for the models that schedule it (G15, G15 v2, G510). The G13 and Z-10 leave it zeroed, so guard the cancel on g15->work.func to avoid cancelling a work that was never set up. The g15 NULL test mirrors the one already in lg_g15_raw_event().
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2026-64362 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: HID: lg-g15: cancel pending work on remove to fix a use-after-free
232 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's lg-g15 Human Interface Device (HID) driver. This vulnerability, a use-after-free, occurs when a Logitech G15, G15 v2, or G510 keyboard is unplugged while a work item is pending. The driver fails to properly cancel this pending work, allowing it to access memory that has already been freed. This race condition can lead to system instability or crashes.
Remediation
Fix deferred
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-48906

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 252 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: lg-g15: cancel pending work on remove to fix a use-after-free lg_g15_data is allocated with devm and holds a work item. The report handlers schedule that work straight from device input. lg_g15_event() and lg_g15_v2_event() do it on the backlight cycle key, and lg_g510_leds_event() does it too. The worker dereferences the lg_g15_data back through container_of. The driver had no remove callback and never cancelled the work. So if a report scheduled the work and the keyboard was then unplugged, devres freed lg_g15_data while the work was still pending or running, and the worker touched freed memory. This is a use-after-free. It is reachable as a race on device unplug. Add a remove callback that cancels the work before devres frees the state. g15->work is only initialized for the models that schedule it (G15, G15 v2, G510). The G13 and Z-10 leave it zeroed, so guard the cancel on g15->work.func to avoid cancelling a work that was never set up. The g15 NULL test mirrors the one already in lg_g15_raw_event().

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: lg-g15: cancel pending work on remove to fix a use-after-free lg_g15_data is allocated with devm and holds a work item. The report handlers schedule that work straight from device input. lg_g15_event() and lg_g15_v2_event() do it on the backlight cycle key, and lg_g510_leds_event() does it too. The worker dereferences the lg_g15_data back through container_of. The driver had no remove callback and never cancelled the work. So if a report scheduled the work and the keyboard was then unplugged, devres freed lg_g15_data while the work was still pending or running, and the worker touched freed memory. This is a use-after-free. It is reachable as a race on device unplug. Add a remove callback that cancels the work before devres frees the state. g15->work is only initialized for the models that schedule it (G15, G15 v2, G510). The G13 and Z-10 leave it zeroed, so guard the cancel on g15->work.func to avoid cancelling a work that was never set up. The g15 NULL test mirrors the one already in lg_g15_raw_event().

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: lg-g15: cancel pending work on remove to fix a use-after-free lg_g15_data is allocated with devm and holds a work item. The report handlers schedule that work straight from device input. lg_g15_event() and lg_g15_v2_event() do it on the backlight cycle key, and lg_g510_leds_event() does it too. The worker dereferences the lg_g15_data back through container_of. The driver had no remove callback and never cancelled the work. So if a report scheduled the work and the keyboard was then unplugged, devres freed lg_g15_data while the work was still pending or running, and the worker touched freed memory. This is a use-after-free. It is reachable as a race on device unplug. Add a remove callback that cancels the work before devres frees the state. g15->work is only initialized for the models that schedule it (G15, G15 v2, G510). The G13 and Z-10 leave it zeroed, so guard the cancel on g15->work.func to avoid cancelling a work that was never set up. The g15 NULL test mirrors the one already in lg_g15_raw_event().

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2527Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260729Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026, published on 29 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64353 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64369 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64344 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64346 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64373 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64375 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64376 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64353 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64369 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64344 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64346 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64375 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64376 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64353 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64369 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64353 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64369 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64344 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64346 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64375 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64376 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1031Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-64351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64369 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64370 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0982Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-64347 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64370 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64371 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64372 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64373 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.5, 5.10.261 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.212 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.178 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.145 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.96 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.1.4 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jul 2026 · Last source change 17 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-48906
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: git.kernel.org/33cd1a000daf929356aacf2b191d31714ff0615e; added patch: git.kernel.org/3b9a3919aac6977262f04d5365c0456877522a44; 6 further additions.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/3b9a3919aac6977262f04d5365c0456877522a44
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/33cd1a000daf929356aacf2b191d31714ff0615e · patch: git.kernel.org/3b9a3919aac6977262f04d5365c0456877522a44 · patch: git.kernel.org/4aef9676c26dff8723b56834951cfc6b618f0986 · 6 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
  2. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  3. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.8 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.8 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-48906↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64362 · cve.blacktree.nl