BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64314High confidence

crypto: chacha20poly1305 - validate poly1305 template argument

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 17 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-49026

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: chacha20poly1305 - validate poly1305 template argument chachapoly_create() still accepts the compatibility poly1305 parameter in the template name, but it assumes the second template argument is always present and immediately passes it to strcmp(). When the argument is missing, crypto_attr_alg_name() returns an error pointer. Check for that before comparing the name so malformed template instantiations fail with an error instead of dereferencing the error pointer in strcmp(). This matches the surrounding Crypto API template pattern where crypto_attr_alg_name() results are validated before string-specific use.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: chacha20poly1305 - validate poly1305 template argument chachapoly_create() still accepts the compatibility poly1305 parameter in the template name, but it assumes the second template argument is always present and immediately passes it to strcmp(). When the argument is missing, crypto_attr_alg_name() returns an error pointer. Check for that before comparing the name so malformed template instantiations fail with an error instead of dereferencing the error pointer in strcmp(). This matches the surrounding Crypto API template pattern where crypto_attr_alg_name() results are validated before string-specific use.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: chacha20poly1305 - validate poly1305 template argument chachapoly_create() still accepts the compatibility poly1305 parameter in the template name, but it assumes the second template argument is always present and immediately passes it to strcmp(). When the argument is missing, crypto_attr_alg_name() returns an error pointer. Check for that before comparing the name so malformed template instantiations fail with an error instead of dereferencing the error pointer in strcmp(). This matches the surrounding Crypto API template pattern where crypto_attr_alg_name() results are validated before string-specific use.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2527Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260729Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026, published on 29 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64312 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64313 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64314 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64315 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64316 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64317 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64320 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64312 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64313 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64314 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64315 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64316 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64317 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64320 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64312 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64313 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64314 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64315 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64316 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64317 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64320 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64312 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64313 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64314 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64315 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64316 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64317 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64320 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-032053LinuxのLinux KernelにおけるNULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:crypto: chacha20poly1305 - poly1305テンプレート引数の検証。chachapoly_create()は互換性のために依然としてpoly1305パラメータをテンプレート名として受け入れますが、2番目のテンプレート引数が常に存在すると仮定し、直ちにstrcmp()に渡しています。引数が欠落している場合、crypto_attr_alg_name()はエラーポインタを返します。名前を比較する前にこれをチェックすることで、誤ったテンプレートの実体化がエラーとなって失敗し、strcmp()でエラーポインタを逆参照することを防いでいます。これは、crypto_attr_alg_name()の結果が文字列として適切に検証される周囲のCrypto APIテンプレートパターンと一致しています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < 0016d3c21c6ab60a20be7f565cefb5999f3adeb6, a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < e74df53b36cdc6b6b9e5488ec883d1d55624737f, a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < 265b861bece38318b8e0fc8fac0643d4ef906d31, 6.16
Fixed
Linux: < 6.16, 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.1.4 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jul 2026 · Last source change 17 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-49026
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: git.kernel.org/0016d3c21c6ab60a20be7f565cefb5999f3adeb6; added patch: git.kernel.org/265b861bece38318b8e0fc8fac0643d4ef906d31; 1 further additions.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/0016d3c21c6ab60a20be7f565cefb5999f3adeb6
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/0016d3c21c6ab60a20be7f565cefb5999f3adeb6 · patch: git.kernel.org/265b861bece38318b8e0fc8fac0643d4ef906d31 · patch: git.kernel.org/e74df53b36cdc6b6b9e5488ec883d1d55624737f · 1 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
  2. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to Medium.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    Medium
    NIST NVD ↗
  3. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 5.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    5.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  4. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < 0016d3c21c6ab60a20be7f565cefb5999f3adeb6; a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < e74df53b36cdc6b6b9e5488ec883d1d55624737f; a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < 265b861bece38318b8e0fc8fac0643d4ef906d31; 6.16 · Fixed: < 6.16; 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.4 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2-rc1 ≤ *
    After
    a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < 0016d3c21c6ab60a20be7f565cefb5999f3adeb6; a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < e74df53b36cdc6b6b9e5488ec883d1d55624737f; a298765e28adaea199f722142c10dae7e24dedf8 < 265b861bece38318b8e0fc8fac0643d4ef906d31; 6.16 · Fixed: < 6.16; 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.4 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64314 · cve.blacktree.nl