BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64235High confidence

x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines

Linux · Linux

8.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.57% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-48644

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines With CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING enabled on an x86 retbleed-affected platform (eg: Skylake), with retbleed=stuff, registering a dynamic ftrace trampoline crashes on the first call into the traced function: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88817ae18880 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 4b53067 P4D 4b53067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 187 Comm: usleep Not tainted 7.0.10 #243 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014 Code: 24 78 00 00 00 00 48 89 ea 48 89 54 24 20 48 8b b4 24 b8 00 00 00 48 8b bc 24 b0 00 00 00 48 89 bc 24 80 00 00 00 48 83 ef 05 <65> 48 c1 3d 1f a8 b6 02 05 48 8b 15 f6 00 00 00 4c 89 3c 24 4c 89 Call Trace: <TASK> ? find_held_lock ? exc_page_fault ? lock_release ? __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare ? trace_hardirqs_on __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep do_syscall_64 ? exc_page_fault ? call_depth_return_thunk entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe ... Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception This small reproducer allows to easily trigger the crash: # echo 'p __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep' > /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/kprobes/p___x64_sys_clock_nanosleep_0/enable # usleep 1 Monitoring the crash under GDB points to the exact instruction in charge of incrementing the call depth: sarq $5, %gs:__x86_call_depth(%rip) This instruction matches the one inserted by the ftrace_regs_caller from ftrace_64.S. This emitted code was likely working fine until the introduction of 59bec00ace28 ("x86/percpu: Introduce %rip-relative addressing to PER_CPU_VAR()"): it has made the call depth accounting addressing relative to $rip, instead of being based on an absolute address. As this code exact location depends on where the trampoline lives in memory, the corresponding displacement needs to be adjusted at runtime to actually correctly find the per-cpu __x86_call_depth value, otherwise the targeted address is wrong, leading to the page fault seen above. Fix the %rip-relative displacement of the copied CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT instruction (from ftrace_regs_caller) by calling text_poke_apply_relocation(), as it is done for example by the x86 BPF JIT compiler through x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(). This corrects both CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT slots, in ftrace_caller and ftrace_regs_caller. [ bp: Massage. ]

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines With CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING enabled on an x86 retbleed-affected platform (eg: Skylake), with retbleed=stuff, registering a dynamic ftrace trampoline crashes on the first call into the traced function: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88817ae18880 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 4b53067 P4D 4b53067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 187 Comm: usleep Not tainted 7.0.10 #243 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014 Code: 24 78 00 00 00 00 48 89 ea 48 89 54 24 20 48 8b b4 24 b8 00 00 00 48 8b bc 24 b0 00 00 00 48 89 bc 24 80 00 00 00 48 83 ef 05 <65> 48 c1 3d 1f a8 b6 02 05 48 8b 15 f6 00 00 00 4c 89 3c 24 4c 89 Call Trace: <TASK> ? find_held_lock ? exc_page_fault ? lock_release ? __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare ? trace_hardirqs_on __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep do_syscall_64 ? exc_page_fault ? call_depth_return_thunk entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe ... Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception This small reproducer allows to easily trigger the crash: # echo 'p __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep' > /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/kprobes/p___x64_sys_clock_nanosleep_0/enable # usleep 1 Monitoring the crash under GDB points to the exact instruction in charge of incrementing the call depth: sarq $5, %gs:__x86_call_depth(%rip) This instruction matches the one inserted by the ftrace_regs_caller from ftrace_64.S. This emitted code was likely working fine until the introduction of 59bec00ace28 ("x86/percpu: Introduce %rip-relative addressing to PER_CPU_VAR()"): it has made the call depth accounting addressing relative to $rip, instead of being based on an absolute address. As this code exact location depends on where the trampoline lives in memory, the corresponding displacement needs to be adjusted at runtime to actually correctly find the per-cpu __x86_call_depth value, otherwise the targeted address is wrong, leading to the page fault seen above. Fix the %rip-relative displacement of the copied CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT instruction (from ftrace_regs_caller) by calling text_poke_apply_relocation(), as it is done for example by the x86 BPF JIT compiler through x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(). This corrects both CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT slots, in ftrace_caller and ftrace_regs_caller. [ bp: Massage. ]

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/ftrace: Relocate %rip-relative percpu refs in dynamic trampolines With CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING enabled on an x86 retbleed-affected platform (eg: Skylake), with retbleed=stuff, registering a dynamic ftrace trampoline crashes on the first call into the traced function: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88817ae18880 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 4b53067 P4D 4b53067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 187 Comm: usleep Not tainted 7.0.10 #243 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014 Code: 24 78 00 00 00 00 48 89 ea 48 89 54 24 20 48 8b b4 24 b8 00 00 00 48 8b bc 24 b0 00 00 00 48 89 bc 24 80 00 00 00 48 83 ef 05 <65> 48 c1 3d 1f a8 b6 02 05 48 8b 15 f6 00 00 00 4c 89 3c 24 4c 89 Call Trace: <TASK> ? find_held_lock ? exc_page_fault ? lock_release ? __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare ? trace_hardirqs_on __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep do_syscall_64 ? exc_page_fault ? call_depth_return_thunk entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe ... Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception This small reproducer allows to easily trigger the crash: # echo 'p __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep' > /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/kprobes/p___x64_sys_clock_nanosleep_0/enable # usleep 1 Monitoring the crash under GDB points to the exact instruction in charge of incrementing the call depth: sarq $5, %gs:__x86_call_depth(%rip) This instruction matches the one inserted by the ftrace_regs_caller from ftrace_64.S. This emitted code was likely working fine until the introduction of 59bec00ace28 ("x86/percpu: Introduce %rip-relative addressing to PER_CPU_VAR()"): it has made the call depth accounting addressing relative to $rip, instead of being based on an absolute address. As this code exact location depends on where the trampoline lives in memory, the corresponding displacement needs to be adjusted at runtime to actually correctly find the per-cpu __x86_call_depth value, otherwise the targeted address is wrong, leading to the page fault seen above. Fix the %rip-relative displacement of the copied CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT instruction (from ftrace_regs_caller) by calling text_poke_apply_relocation(), as it is done for example by the x86 BPF JIT compiler through x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(). This corrects both CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT slots, in ftrace_caller and ftrace_regs_caller. [ bp: Massage. ]

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2527Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260729Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026, published on 29 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64235 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64235 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64235 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64235 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64235 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-028055LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。x86/ftrace: 動的トランポリン内の%rip相対percpu参照の再配置についてです。CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKINGが有効で、x86のretbleedの影響を受けるプラットフォーム(例:Skylake)でretbleed=stuffを設定した場合、動的ftraceトランポリンの登録時にトレースされた関数への最初の呼び出しでクラッシュが発生します。具体的には以下のようなエラーが生じます。 BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88817ae18880#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present pagePGD 4b53067 P4D 4b53067 PUD 0Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTICPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 187 Comm: usleep Not tainted 7.0.10 #243 PREEMPT(full)Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014Code: 24 78 00 00 00 00 48 89 ea 48 89 54 24 20 48 8b b4 24 b8 00 00 00 48 8b bc 24 b0 00 00 00 48 89 bc 24 80 00 00 00 48 83 ef 05 <65> 48 c1 3d 1f a8 b6 02 05 48 8b 15 f6 00 00 00 4c 89 3c 24 4c 89Call Trace:<TASK>? find_held_lock? exc_page_fault? lock_release? __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare? trace_hardirqs_on__x64_sys_clock_nanosleepdo_syscall_64? exc_page_fault? call_depth_return_thunkentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe...Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exceptionこの問題は、以下の簡単な再現コードで容易にクラッシュを誘発できます。 # echo 'p __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep' > /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/kprobes/p___x64_sys_clock_nanosleep_0/enable# usleep 1GDBでクラッシュを監視すると、コール深度をインクリメントする命令に正確にポイントします。具体的には、sarq $5, %gs:__x86_call_depth(%rip)という命令です。この命令はftrace_64.Sのftrace_regs_callerによって挿入されたものであり、この生成コードはおそらく以下の導入までは正常に機能していました。 59bec00ace28 ("x86/percpu: PER_CPU_VAR()への%rip相対アドレッシング導入")この変更により、コール深度計測のアドレス指定が絶対アドレスではなく%rip相対になりました。そこで、このコードの正確な場所はトランポリンのメモリ上の位置に依存するため、対応するオフセットは実行時に調整しなければなりません。そうしないと、正しいper-cpuの__x86_call_depth値を見つけることができず、ターゲットアドレスが誤って上記のページフォルトを引き起こします。 コピーされたCALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT命令(ftrace_regs_caller由来)の%rip相対オフセットをtext_poke_apply_relocation()を呼び出して修正します。これはx86のBPF JITコンパイラがx86_call_depth_emit_accounting()を通じて行っているのと同様の処理です。これにより、ftrace_callerとftrace_regs_callerの両方のCALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNTスロットが正しく修正されます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 59bec00ace28d565ae0a68b23063ef3b961d82d5 < 8093442a2d1d4b42b9340a86023ccb2afb30b93a, 59bec00ace28d565ae0a68b23063ef3b961d82d5 < d59cc66b702757e3c5a711e78a38583eac0c2738, 59bec00ace28d565ae0a68b23063ef3b961d82d5 < 9edff632ca216169846f8a63a5a3dc467e239c7a, 59bec00ace28d565ae0a68b23063ef3b961d82d5 < a17dc12bfed8868e6a86f3b45c16065a70641acb, 6.9
Fixed
Linux: < 6.9, 6.12.93 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.35 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.12 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Jul 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-48644
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64235 · cve.blacktree.nl