BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64222High confidence

octeontx2-pf: avoid double free of pool->stack on AQ init failure

Linux · Linux

7.0HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.12% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-64222 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 12 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-64222
209 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-pf: avoid double free of pool->stack on AQ init failure otx2_pool_aq_init() frees pool->stack when mailbox sync or retry allocation fails, but leaves the pointer unchanged. Later, otx2_sq_aura_pool_init() unwinds the partial setup through otx2_aura_pool_free(), which frees pool->stack again. The CN20K-specific cn20k_pool_aq_init() implementation has the same bug in its corresponding error path. Set pool->stack to NULL immediately after the local free so the shared cleanup path does not free the same stack again while cleaning up partially initialized pool state. The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly available. Manual inspection confirms that the bug is still present in v7.1-rc3. Runtime validation was not performed because reproducing this path requires OcteonTX2/CN20K hardware.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-48630

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-pf: avoid double free of pool->stack on AQ init failure otx2_pool_aq_init() frees pool->stack when mailbox sync or retry allocation fails, but leaves the pointer unchanged. Later, otx2_sq_aura_pool_init() unwinds the partial setup through otx2_aura_pool_free(), which frees pool->stack again. The CN20K-specific cn20k_pool_aq_init() implementation has the same bug in its corresponding error path. Set pool->stack to NULL immediately after the local free so the shared cleanup path does not free the same stack again while cleaning up partially initialized pool state. The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly available. Manual inspection confirms that the bug is still present in v7.1-rc3. Runtime validation was not performed because reproducing this path requires OcteonTX2/CN20K hardware.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-pf: avoid double free of pool->stack on AQ init failure otx2_pool_aq_init() frees pool->stack when mailbox sync or retry allocation fails, but leaves the pointer unchanged. Later, otx2_sq_aura_pool_init() unwinds the partial setup through otx2_aura_pool_free(), which frees pool->stack again. The CN20K-specific cn20k_pool_aq_init() implementation has the same bug in its corresponding error path. Set pool->stack to NULL immediately after the local free so the shared cleanup path does not free the same stack again while cleaning up partially initialized pool state. The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly available. Manual inspection confirms that the bug is still present in v7.1-rc3. Runtime validation was not performed because reproducing this path requires OcteonTX2/CN20K hardware.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-pf: avoid double free of pool->stack on AQ init failure otx2_pool_aq_init() frees pool->stack when mailbox sync or retry allocation fails, but leaves the pointer unchanged. Later, otx2_sq_aura_pool_init() unwinds the partial setup through otx2_aura_pool_free(), which frees pool->stack again. The CN20K-specific cn20k_pool_aq_init() implementation has the same bug in its corresponding error path. Set pool->stack to NULL immediately after the local free so the shared cleanup path does not free the same stack again while cleaning up partially initialized pool state. The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly available. Manual inspection confirms that the bug is still present in v7.1-rc3. Runtime validation was not performed because reproducing this path requires OcteonTX2/CN20K hardware.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Double Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-415 ↗

CWE-415: Double Free. The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-415
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2527Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260729Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Jul 2026, published on 29 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64192 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64210 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64188 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64192 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64188 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64192 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-027851LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける二重解放に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、次の脆弱性が解決されました。octeontx2-pfのAQ初期化失敗時にpool->stackの二重解放を回避するotx2_pool_aq_init()は、メールボックスの同期やリトライ割り当てが失敗した場合にpool->stackを解放しますが、ポインタを変更しません。その後、otx2_sq_aura_pool_init()はotx2_aura_pool_free()を通じて部分的に行ったセットアップを元に戻し、この関数が再度pool->stackを解放します。CN20K固有のcn20k_pool_aq_init()の実装でも、対応するエラーパスで同じ不具合が存在しています。ローカルで解放した直後にpool->stackをNULLに設定することで、共有のクリーンアップパスが部分的に初期化されたプール状態をクリーンアップする際に同じstackを再度解放しないようにしています。この不具合は、v6.13-rc1の解析時にカーネルのメモリ管理バグを検出するための開発中の実験的解析ツールで初めて検出されました。このツールはまだ開発中で一般公開されていません。手動による確認により、v7.1-rc3でもこの不具合が依然として存在することが確認されています。OcteonTX2/CN20Kハードウェアが必要なため、この経路の再現は困難であり、実行時検証は行われていません。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.6, 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.93 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.35 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.11 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Jul 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC · CWE-415 · Double Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-48630
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64222 · cve.blacktree.nl