BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64183High confidence

efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-45868

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2026-2403Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1091Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-63991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64174 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64179 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64174 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64188 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64174 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64175 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64177 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64178 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64179 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64181 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64208 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64210 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64174 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64175 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64177 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64178 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64179 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64181 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64208 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64210 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64174 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64175 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64177 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64178 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64179 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64181 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64186 Gestion détaillée du document le 24 juillet 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
5894cf571e14fb393a4d0a82538de032127b9d8b < 29cd94e678fcb3c4fd0f359deeac6d61334323fc; 5894cf571e14fb393a4d0a82538de032127b9d8b < 6996e954ae830f5b793ba6cf449885ca519dbdd2; 5894cf571e14fb393a4d0a82538de032127b9d8b < c32a1fbe0f9a48453a552bb315cc4f1e7a74084e; 5894cf571e14fb393a4d0a82538de032127b9d8b < e871549f7894ad4114b3dd53f241aa25a268ba8b; 5894cf571e14fb393a4d0a82538de032127b9d8b < 13c6da02e767152c9ac4330962247a5e47011035; 6.6
Fixed
< 6.6; 6.6.142 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.92 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.34 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.0.11 ≤ 7.0.*; 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jul 2026 · Last source change 19 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45868
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64183 · cve.blacktree.nl