Full vulnerability report · 2026

CVE-2026-64112High confidence

rbd: eliminate a race in lock_dwork draining on unmap

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1

Recommended action

Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product

Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →

Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
EPSS is 0.10% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Debian Security Tracker, Canonical Ubuntu Security: 21 affected package states with no published fix

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states

Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution release	Source package	Vendor state	Fixed version	Evidence
Debian trixietrixie · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`6.12.94-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · source	`linux`	Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.	`Not published in this feed`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`7.0.12-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`7.0.12-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-aws`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-fde`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gcp`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gke`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gkeop`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-ibm`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-tegra`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oem-6.11`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oracle`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-riscv`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-xilinx`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current

CVE-2026-64112 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 11 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-64112

350 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.1

Summary: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rbd: eliminate a race in lock_dwork draining on unmap Given how rbd_lock_add_request() and rbd_img_exclusive_lock() are written, lock_dwork may be (re)queued more than it's actually needed: for example in case a new I/O request comes in while we are in the middle of rbd_acquire_lock() on behalf of another I/O request. This is expected and with rbd_release_lock() preemptively canceling lock_dwork is benign under normal operation. A more problematic example is maybe_kick_acquire(): if (have_requests || delayed_work_pending(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork)) { dout("%s rbd_dev %p kicking lock_dwork\n", __func__, rbd_dev); mod_delayed_work(rbd_dev->task_wq, &rbd_dev->lock_dwork, 0); } It's not unrealistic for lock_dwork to get canceled right after delayed_work_pending() returns true and for mod_delayed_work() to requeue it right there anyway. This is a classic TOCTOU race. When it comes to unmapping the image, there is an implicit assumption of no self-initiated exclusive lock activity past the point of return from rbd_dev_image_unlock() which unlocks the lock if it happens to be held. This unlock is assumed to be final and lock_dwork (as well as all other exclusive lock tasks, really) isn't expected to get queued again. However, lock_dwork is canceled only in cancel_tasks_sync() (i.e. later in the unmap sequence) and on top of that the cancellation can get in effect nullified by maybe_kick_acquire(). This may result in rbd_acquire_lock() executing after rbd_dev_device_release() and rbd_dev_image_release() run and free and/or reset a bunch of things. One of the possible failure modes then is a violated rbd_assert(rbd_image_format_valid(rbd_dev->image_format)); in rbd_dev_header_info() which is called via rbd_dev_refresh() from rbd_post_acquire_action(). Redo exclusive lock task draining to provide saner semantics and try to meet the assumptions around rbd_dev_image_unlock().
Remediation: To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Fix availability varies by product

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rbd: eliminate a race in lock_dwork draining on unmap Given how rbd_lock_add_request() and rbd_img_exclusive_lock() are written, lock_dwork may be (re)queued more than it's actually needed: for example in case a new I/O request comes in while we are in the middle of rbd_acquire_lock() on behalf of another I/O request. This is expected and with rbd_release_lock() preemptively canceling lock_dwork is benign under normal operation. A more problematic example is maybe_kick_acquire(): if (have_requests || delayed_work_pending(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork)) { dout("%s rbd_dev %p kicking lock_dwork\n", __func__, rbd_dev); mod_delayed_work(rbd_dev->task_wq, &rbd_dev->lock_dwork, 0); } It's not unrealistic for lock_dwork to get canceled right after delayed_work_pending() returns true and for mod_delayed_work() to requeue it right there anyway. This is a classic TOCTOU race. When it comes to unmapping the image, there is an implicit assumption of no self-initiated exclusive lock activity past the point of return from rbd_dev_image_unlock() which unlocks the lock if it happens to be held. This unlock is assumed to be final and lock_dwork (as well as all other exclusive lock tasks, really) isn't expected to get queued again. However, lock_dwork is canceled only in cancel_tasks_sync() (i.e. later in the unmap sequence) and on top of that the cancellation can get in effect nullified by maybe_kick_acquire(). This may result in rbd_acquire_lock() executing after rbd_dev_device_release() and rbd_dev_image_release() run and free and/or reset a bunch of things. One of the possible failure modes then is a violated rbd_assert(rbd_image_format_valid(rbd_dev->image_format)); in rbd_dev_header_info() which is called via rbd_dev_refresh() from rbd_post_acquire_action(). Redo exclusive lock task draining to provide saner semantics and try to meet the assumptions around rbd_dev_image_unlock().

What

Why

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Why

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

How

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path: local access → Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface: Local
Privileges required: Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction: None
Attack complexity: Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary: Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ? CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.: CWE-367 ↗
CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition. The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.
CVSS vector ? CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land: The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.

CWE-367

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45797Official EUVD mapping

0 linked advisory records.

Official EUVD record ↗

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2403Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260722Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026, published on 22 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64087 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-028068LinuxのLinux KernelにおけるTime-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) 競合状態の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。 rbd: unmap時のlock_dwork排水における競合状態の解消 rbd_lock_add_request()およびrbd_img_exclusive_lock()の実装方法から、lock_dworkは実際に必要なよりも多く（再）キューイングされる可能性があります。例えば、別のI/O要求のためにrbd_acquire_lock()の実行中に新しいI/O要求が入った場合です。これは想定内であり、rbd_release_lock()がlock_dworkを先回りしてキャンセルすることは通常の動作下で無害です。より問題となる例はmaybe_kick_acquire()内の以下のコードです。 if (have_requests || delayed_work_pending(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork)) { dout("%s rbd_dev %p kicking lock_dwork ", func, rbd_dev); mod_delayed_work(rbd_dev->task_wq, &rbd_dev->lock_dwork, 0); } delayed_work_pending()がtrueを返した直後にlock_dworkがキャンセルされ、その直後にmod_delayed_work()で再度キューイングされることは現実的にあり得ます。これは典型的なTOCTOU（時間的競合）レース条件です。イメージのアンマップに関しては、rbd_dev_image_unlock()からの戻り以降に自己発生の排他的ロック操作が行われないという暗黙の前提があります。この関数はロックが保持されていれば解除し、その解除は最終的なものと見なされ、lock_dwork（および他の排他的ロックタスクも）は再度キューイングされないと期待されています。しかし、lock_dworkのキャンセルはcancel_tasks_sync()（アンマップ処理の後半）でのみ行われ、さらにそのキャンセルもmaybe_kick_acquire()によって実質的に無効化される可能性があります。これにより、rbd_dev_device_release()やrbd_dev_image_release()が実行されてリソースが解放またはリセットされた後でもrbd_acquire_lock()が実行される恐れがあります。この結果の一つの失敗モードとして、rbd_post_acquire_action()から呼ばれるrbd_dev_refresh()内でrbd_dev_header_info()が呼ばれた際に rbd_assert(rbd_image_format_valid(rbd_dev->image_format)); が破られる可能性があります。排他的ロックタスクの排水をやり直し、より健全なセマンティクスを提供し、rbd_dev_image_unlock()周辺の前提条件を満たすようにしました。

Official advisory ↗

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status ? Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.: Fix availability varies by product
Affected: kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.1
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.1
cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
and 320 more
Fixed: Linux: < 4.12, 6.12.92 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.34 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.11 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action: Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround: No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jul 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC · CWE-367 · Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2

CVSS sourceCNA

EPSS source

The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.

FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14

European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45797

Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team

Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team

CWE sourceNIST NVD

NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

2026-07-19CVE published

2026-08-05Fixed release or patch reference recorded

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45797↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗

Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report

CVE: Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS: Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS: Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE: Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA: CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD: National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT: A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC: Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF: Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL: Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.

rbd: eliminate a race in lock_dwork draining on unmap

Published severity in operational context

Evidence used

Compensating controls

Verification

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Release-specific package status

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

National CERT insights
?
CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

EUVD-2026-45797

What, why and how

Exploit reality and attack path

Official authority intelligence

Patch and workaround

Evidence and provenance

What changed after publication