BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64069High confidence

netfs: Fix cancellation of a DIO and single read subrequests

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.65% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-45642

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix cancellation of a DIO and single read subrequests When the preparation of a new subrequest for a read fails, if the subrequest has already been added to the stream->subrequests list, it can't simply be put and abandoned as the collector may see it. Also, if it hasn't been queued yet, it has two outstanding refs that both need to be put. Both DIO read and single-read dispatch fail at this; further, both differ in the order they do things to the way buffered read works. Fix cancellation of both DIO-read and single-read subrequests that failed preparation by the following steps: (1) Harmonise all three reads (buffered, dio, single) to queue the subreq before prepping it. (2) Make all three call netfs_queue_read() to do the queuing. (3) Set NETFS_RREQ_ALL_QUEUED independently of the queuing as we don't know the length of the subreq at this point. (4) In all cases, set the error and NETFS_SREQ_FAILED flag on the subreq and then call netfs_read_subreq_terminated() to deal with it. This will pass responsibility off to the collector for dealing with it.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix cancellation of a DIO and single read subrequests When the preparation of a new subrequest for a read fails, if the subrequest has already been added to the stream->subrequests list, it can't simply be put and abandoned as the collector may see it. Also, if it hasn't been queued yet, it has two outstanding refs that both need to be put. Both DIO read and single-read dispatch fail at this; further, both differ in the order they do things to the way buffered read works. Fix cancellation of both DIO-read and single-read subrequests that failed preparation by the following steps: (1) Harmonise all three reads (buffered, dio, single) to queue the subreq before prepping it. (2) Make all three call netfs_queue_read() to do the queuing. (3) Set NETFS_RREQ_ALL_QUEUED independently of the queuing as we don't know the length of the subreq at this point. (4) In all cases, set the error and NETFS_SREQ_FAILED flag on the subreq and then call netfs_read_subreq_terminated() to deal with it. This will pass responsibility off to the collector for dealing with it.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix cancellation of a DIO and single read subrequests When the preparation of a new subrequest for a read fails, if the subrequest has already been added to the stream->subrequests list, it can't simply be put and abandoned as the collector may see it. Also, if it hasn't been queued yet, it has two outstanding refs that both need to be put. Both DIO read and single-read dispatch fail at this; further, both differ in the order they do things to the way buffered read works. Fix cancellation of both DIO-read and single-read subrequests that failed preparation by the following steps: (1) Harmonise all three reads (buffered, dio, single) to queue the subreq before prepping it. (2) Make all three call netfs_queue_read() to do the queuing. (3) Set NETFS_RREQ_ALL_QUEUED independently of the queuing as we don't know the length of the subreq at this point. (4) In all cases, set the error and NETFS_SREQ_FAILED flag on the subreq and then call netfs_read_subreq_terminated() to deal with it. This will pass responsibility off to the collector for dealing with it.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2403Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260722Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026, published on 22 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-031825LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:netfsのDIOおよび単一読み取りサブリクエストのキャンセル修正です。新しい読み取りサブリクエストの準備に失敗した場合、もしサブリクエストがすでにstream->subrequestsリストに追加されていると、単純に破棄することはできません。これはコレクターがそれを検知する可能性があるためです。また、まだキューイングされていない場合、そのサブリクエストには未処理の参照が2つあり、両方を解放する必要があります。DIO読み取りおよび単一読み取りの両方のディスパッチはこの部分で失敗し、さらにそれぞれの処理順序はバッファ読み取りの処理と異なっています。準備に失敗したDIO読み取りおよび単一読み取りのキャンセルは以下の手順で修正しました。 (1) すべての読み取り(バッファ、DIO、単一)を調整し、準備前にサブリクエストをキューに入れるようにしました。 (2) 3種類すべてでnetfs_queue_read()を呼び出してキューイング処理を行うようにしました。 (3) この時点でサブリクエストの長さが不明なため、キューイングの有無に関わらずNETFS_RREQ_ALL_QUEUEDを設定します。 (4) すべての場合でエラーおよびNETFS_SREQ_FAILEDフラグをサブリクエストに設定し、netfs_read_subreq_terminated()を呼び出して処理を行います。これにより、処理の責任はコレクターに引き継がれます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e2d46f2ec332533816417b60933954173f602121 < 5366199be46fb53de62861721d34ba816e7e440e, e2d46f2ec332533816417b60933954173f602121 < f73372a4c6900d117f8e903fe10b62692f95e6c4, e2d46f2ec332533816417b60933954173f602121 < 6f0f7ac1915abc0d202f0eb4b003a6548a5ba60d, 6.14
Fixed
Linux: < 6.14, 6.18.34 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.11 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jul 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45642
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: git.kernel.org/5366199be46fb53de62861721d34ba816e7e440e; added patch: git.kernel.org/6f0f7ac1915abc0d202f0eb4b003a6548a5ba60d; 1 further additions.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/5366199be46fb53de62861721d34ba816e7e440e
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/5366199be46fb53de62861721d34ba816e7e440e · patch: git.kernel.org/6f0f7ac1915abc0d202f0eb4b003a6548a5ba60d · patch: git.kernel.org/f73372a4c6900d117f8e903fe10b62692f95e6c4 · 1 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64069 · cve.blacktree.nl