BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64047High confidence

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-45620

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring When an sk_msg scatterlist ring wraps (sg.end < sg.start), tls_push_record() chains the tail portion of the ring to the head using sg_chain(). An extra entry in the sg array is reserved for this: struct sk_msg_sg { [...] /* The extra two elements: * 1) used for chaining the front and sections when the list becomes * partitioned (e.g. end < start). The crypto APIs require the * chaining; * 2) to chain tailer SG entries after the message. */ struct scatterlist data[MAX_MSG_FRAGS + 2]; The current code uses MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 as the ring size: sg_chain(&msg_pl->sg.data[msg_pl->sg.start], MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_pl->sg.start + 1, msg_pl->sg.data); This places the chain pointer at sg_chain(data[start], (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_start + 1) .. = &data[start] + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_start + 1) - 1 = data[start + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - start + 1) - 1] = data[MAX_SKB_FRAGS] instead of the true last entry. This is likely due to a "race" of the commit under Fixes landing close to commit 031097d9e079 ("bpf: sk_msg, zap ingress queue on psock down") Convert to ARRAY_SIZE and drop the data[start] / - start (as suggested by Sabrina).

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring When an sk_msg scatterlist ring wraps (sg.end < sg.start), tls_push_record() chains the tail portion of the ring to the head using sg_chain(). An extra entry in the sg array is reserved for this: struct sk_msg_sg { [...] /* The extra two elements: * 1) used for chaining the front and sections when the list becomes * partitioned (e.g. end < start). The crypto APIs require the * chaining; * 2) to chain tailer SG entries after the message. */ struct scatterlist data[MAX_MSG_FRAGS + 2]; The current code uses MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 as the ring size: sg_chain(&msg_pl->sg.data[msg_pl->sg.start], MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_pl->sg.start + 1, msg_pl->sg.data); This places the chain pointer at sg_chain(data[start], (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_start + 1) .. = &data[start] + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_start + 1) - 1 = data[start + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - start + 1) - 1] = data[MAX_SKB_FRAGS] instead of the true last entry. This is likely due to a "race" of the commit under Fixes landing close to commit 031097d9e079 ("bpf: sk_msg, zap ingress queue on psock down") Convert to ARRAY_SIZE and drop the data[start] / - start (as suggested by Sabrina).

Why

A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring When an sk_msg scatterlist ring wraps (sg.end < sg.start), tls_push_record() chains the tail portion of the ring to the head using sg_chain(). An extra entry in the sg array is reserved for this: struct sk_msg_sg { [...] /* The extra two elements: * 1) used for chaining the front and sections when the list becomes * partitioned (e.g. end < start). The crypto APIs require the * chaining; * 2) to chain tailer SG entries after the message. */ struct scatterlist data[MAX_MSG_FRAGS + 2]; The current code uses MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 as the ring size: sg_chain(&msg_pl->sg.data[msg_pl->sg.start], MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_pl->sg.start + 1, msg_pl->sg.data); This places the chain pointer at sg_chain(data[start], (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_start + 1) .. = &data[start] + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_start + 1) - 1 = data[start + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - start + 1) - 1] = data[MAX_SKB_FRAGS] instead of the true last entry. This is likely due to a "race" of the commit under Fixes landing close to commit 031097d9e079 ("bpf: sk_msg, zap ingress queue on psock down") Convert to ARRAY_SIZE and drop the data[start] / - start (as suggested by Sabrina).

Why

A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Off-by-one Error → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-193

CWE-193: Off-by-one Error. A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-193
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2403Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-64011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64055 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53379 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63860 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63865 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64055 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64087 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53379 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63860 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63865 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64055 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64087 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-031747LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界条件の判定に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:net: tls: sk_msgリングのラップ時のsg_chainエントリ数のオフバイワンを修正しました。sk_msgのscatterlistリングがラップするとき(sg.end < sg.start)、tls_push_record()はsg_chain()を使ってリングの末尾部分を先頭に連結します。このため、sg配列には追加のエントリが予約されています。 struct sk_msg_sg { [...] /* 追加の2つの要素: * 1) リストが分割される(例:end < start)際に、前部分と後部分を連結するために使われます。暗号APIはこの連結を要求しています。 * 2) メッセージ後にテールのSGエントリを連結するためです。 */ struct scatterlist data[MAX_MSG_FRAGS + 2];現在のコードではリングサイズとしてMAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1を使用しています。 sg_chain(&msg_pl->sg.data[msg_pl->sg.start], MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_pl->sg.start + 1, msg_pl->sg.data);これによりチェインポインタは以下のように配置されてしまい、真の最後のエントリではありません。 sg_chain(data[start], (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - start + 1)) = &data[start] + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - start + 1) - 1 = data[start + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - start + 1) - 1] = data[MAX_SKB_FRAGS]これは、おそらくFixesがcommit 031097d9e079("bpf: sk_msg, zap ingress queue on psock down")に近い状態で適用された「競合」が原因です。提案された方法としては、Sabrinaの指摘に従い、data[start]や-startを削除し、ARRAY_SIZEを使うように変更してください。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 9aaaa56845a06aeabdd597cbe19492dc01f281ec < 73963a375885d5ccb7def39fd0b4f542e0f343dd, 9aaaa56845a06aeabdd597cbe19492dc01f281ec < 47110c3a9ac247b688657337f5981efcfcb240dc, 9aaaa56845a06aeabdd597cbe19492dc01f281ec < 84158c2997159df4a0d70cd9c46774512d32a522, 9aaaa56845a06aeabdd597cbe19492dc01f281ec < 131ef12057d92b77b636321b7849c69222405a97, 9aaaa56845a06aeabdd597cbe19492dc01f281ec < 66339b71f105e6f83e0da3b9583d95077534fe1d, 9aaaa56845a06aeabdd597cbe19492dc01f281ec < eca989eab4b2599dcb02f72140a7c08f08838520, 9aaaa56845a06aeabdd597cbe19492dc01f281ec < 2fb0dc7e0099686c4e9d2732745d8a31b18c3628, 9aaaa56845a06aeabdd597cbe19492dc01f281ec < 285943c6e7ca309bbea84b253745154241d9788a, d529d6c9f7e3aaeac13c4948f79799ccb825f29d, 5.4.14 < 5.5, 5.5
Fixed
Linux: < 5.5, 5.10.258 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.142 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.92 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.34 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.11 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jul 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC · CWE-193 · Off-by-one Error

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45620
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from authoritative remediation link to authoritative remediation link · patch.
    Before
    authoritative remediation link
    After
    authoritative remediation link · patch
    416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64047 · cve.blacktree.nl