BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-64044High confidence

ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMD_NEW_PEER error path

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-45617

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMD_NEW_PEER error path ovpn_nl_peer_new_doit()'s error path calls ovpn_peer_release() directly rather than ovpn_peer_put(), bypassing the kref. The accompanying comment ("peer was not yet hashed, thus it is not used in any context") holds for UDP but not for TCP. For UDP, the ovpn_socket union uses the .ovpn arm and never points back at a peer; UDP encap_recv looks up peers via the not-yet-populated hashtables, so the new peer is unreachable until ovpn_peer_add() publishes it. For TCP, ovpn_socket_new() sets ovpn_sock->peer and ovpn_tcp_socket_attach() publishes ovpn_sock via rcu_assign_sk_user_data(). From that moment until ovpn_socket_release() detaches in the error path, the TCP fd is fully wired: userspace recvmsg / sendmsg / close / poll on the fd, as well as the strparser-driven ovpn_tcp_rcv() path, can reach the peer through sk_user_data -> ovpn_sock->peer and bump its refcount via ovpn_peer_hold(). ovpn_tcp_socket_wait_finish() (called inside ovpn_socket_release()) drains strparser and the tx work, but does not synchronize with userspace syscall callers that already hold a peer reference. If ovpn_nl_peer_modify() or ovpn_peer_add() returns an error while such a caller is in flight - notably an ovpn_tcp_recvmsg() blocked in __skb_recv_datagram() on peer->tcp.user_queue - the direct ovpn_peer_release() destroys the peer while the caller still holds the reference, and the eventual ovpn_peer_put() from that caller operates on freed memory. Replace the direct destructor call with ovpn_peer_put() so the kref correctly defers destruction until the last reference is dropped. In the common case where no concurrent user is present, behaviour is unchanged: the kref hits zero immediately and ovpn_peer_release_kref() runs the same destructor. With this conversion ovpn_peer_release() has no callers outside peer.c - ovpn_peer_release_kref() in the same translation unit is the only remaining user - so make it static and drop its declaration from peer.h.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMD_NEW_PEER error path ovpn_nl_peer_new_doit()'s error path calls ovpn_peer_release() directly rather than ovpn_peer_put(), bypassing the kref. The accompanying comment ("peer was not yet hashed, thus it is not used in any context") holds for UDP but not for TCP. For UDP, the ovpn_socket union uses the .ovpn arm and never points back at a peer; UDP encap_recv looks up peers via the not-yet-populated hashtables, so the new peer is unreachable until ovpn_peer_add() publishes it. For TCP, ovpn_socket_new() sets ovpn_sock->peer and ovpn_tcp_socket_attach() publishes ovpn_sock via rcu_assign_sk_user_data(). From that moment until ovpn_socket_release() detaches in the error path, the TCP fd is fully wired: userspace recvmsg / sendmsg / close / poll on the fd, as well as the strparser-driven ovpn_tcp_rcv() path, can reach the peer through sk_user_data -> ovpn_sock->peer and bump its refcount via ovpn_peer_hold(). ovpn_tcp_socket_wait_finish() (called inside ovpn_socket_release()) drains strparser and the tx work, but does not synchronize with userspace syscall callers that already hold a peer reference. If ovpn_nl_peer_modify() or ovpn_peer_add() returns an error while such a caller is in flight - notably an ovpn_tcp_recvmsg() blocked in __skb_recv_datagram() on peer->tcp.user_queue - the direct ovpn_peer_release() destroys the peer while the caller still holds the reference, and the eventual ovpn_peer_put() from that caller operates on freed memory. Replace the direct destructor call with ovpn_peer_put() so the kref correctly defers destruction until the last reference is dropped. In the common case where no concurrent user is present, behaviour is unchanged: the kref hits zero immediately and ovpn_peer_release_kref() runs the same destructor. With this conversion ovpn_peer_release() has no callers outside peer.c - ovpn_peer_release_kref() in the same translation unit is the only remaining user - so make it static and drop its declaration from peer.h.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ovpn: respect peer refcount in CMD_NEW_PEER error path ovpn_nl_peer_new_doit()'s error path calls ovpn_peer_release() directly rather than ovpn_peer_put(), bypassing the kref. The accompanying comment ("peer was not yet hashed, thus it is not used in any context") holds for UDP but not for TCP. For UDP, the ovpn_socket union uses the .ovpn arm and never points back at a peer; UDP encap_recv looks up peers via the not-yet-populated hashtables, so the new peer is unreachable until ovpn_peer_add() publishes it. For TCP, ovpn_socket_new() sets ovpn_sock->peer and ovpn_tcp_socket_attach() publishes ovpn_sock via rcu_assign_sk_user_data(). From that moment until ovpn_socket_release() detaches in the error path, the TCP fd is fully wired: userspace recvmsg / sendmsg / close / poll on the fd, as well as the strparser-driven ovpn_tcp_rcv() path, can reach the peer through sk_user_data -> ovpn_sock->peer and bump its refcount via ovpn_peer_hold(). ovpn_tcp_socket_wait_finish() (called inside ovpn_socket_release()) drains strparser and the tx work, but does not synchronize with userspace syscall callers that already hold a peer reference. If ovpn_nl_peer_modify() or ovpn_peer_add() returns an error while such a caller is in flight - notably an ovpn_tcp_recvmsg() blocked in __skb_recv_datagram() on peer->tcp.user_queue - the direct ovpn_peer_release() destroys the peer while the caller still holds the reference, and the eventual ovpn_peer_put() from that caller operates on freed memory. Replace the direct destructor call with ovpn_peer_put() so the kref correctly defers destruction until the last reference is dropped. In the common case where no concurrent user is present, behaviour is unchanged: the kref hits zero immediately and ovpn_peer_release_kref() runs the same destructor. With this conversion ovpn_peer_release() has no callers outside peer.c - ovpn_peer_release_kref() in the same translation unit is the only remaining user - so make it static and drop its declaration from peer.h.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2403Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260722Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026, published on 22 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-64035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-031750LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。ovpn: CMD_NEW_PEERのエラーパスでピアの参照カウントを正しく尊重するように修正しました。ovpn_nl_peer_new_doit()のエラーパスは従来、ovpn_peer_put()ではなく直接ovpn_peer_release()を呼び出しており、krefをバイパスしていました。付随するコメント「peerはまだハッシュされておらず、いかなるコンテキストでも使用されていない」はUDPの場合には正しいものの、TCPの場合には成り立ちません。UDPの場合、ovpn_socketの共用体は.ovpnアームを使用し、決してピアを指し示しません。UDPのencap_recvはまだ初期化されていないハッシュテーブルを介してピアを検索するため、新しいピアはovpn_peer_add()が公開するまでは到達不能です。一方TCPの場合、ovpn_socket_new()はovpn_sock->peerを設定し、ovpn_tcp_socket_attach()はrcu_assign_sk_user_data()を通じてovpn_sockを公開します。エラーパスでovpn_socket_release()が切り離すまでの間、TCPのファイルディスクリプターは完全に結び付けられており、ユーザースペースのrecvmsg/sendmsg/close/pollやstrparser駆動のovpn_tcp_rcv()パスはsk_user_data -> ovpn_sock->peer経由でピアにアクセスし、ovpn_peer_hold()を介して参照カウントを増やすことが可能です。ovpn_tcp_socket_wait_finish()(ovpn_socket_release()内で呼び出される)はstrparserとtxワークを空にしますが、ピア参照をすでに保持しているユーザースペースのシステムコール呼び出しとは同期していません。もしovpn_nl_peer_modify()やovpn_peer_add()がそのような呼び出し中にエラーを返した場合、特にpeer->tcp.user_queueで__skb_recv_datagram()にブロックされたovpn_tcp_recvmsg()においては、直接的なovpn_peer_release()が参照を保持したままピアを破壊し、最終的にその呼び出しからのovpn_peer_put()が解放済みメモリ上で操作を行ってしまいます。これを防ぐため、直接的なデストラクタ呼び出しをovpn_peer_put()に置き換え、krefが最後の参照が切れるまで破壊を正しく遅延させるようにしました。一般的なケースでは同時にユーザーが存在しない場合でも、動作は変更されません。krefは即座にゼロに達し、ovpn_peer_release_kref()が同じデストラクタを実行します。この変更により、ovpn_peer_release()はpeer.c外からの呼び出しがなくなり、同じ翻訳単位内のovpn_peer_release_kref()のみが残るためstatic化され、peer.hからの宣言を削除しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 11851cbd60ea1e5abbd97619d69845ead99303d6 < 8298834912d76dbc82c12b6b4ab7590ed2bb8ae5, 11851cbd60ea1e5abbd97619d69845ead99303d6 < 0c3ef71879c0264de6c42463031d9e057da87840, 11851cbd60ea1e5abbd97619d69845ead99303d6 < 1fef6614673ff0846d30acdeeaf3cf98bb5f6116, 6.16
Fixed
Linux: < 6.16, 6.18.34 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.11 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jul 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45617
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: git.kernel.org/0c3ef71879c0264de6c42463031d9e057da87840; added patch: git.kernel.org/1fef6614673ff0846d30acdeeaf3cf98bb5f6116; 1 further additions.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/8298834912d76dbc82c12b6b4ab7590ed2bb8ae5
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/0c3ef71879c0264de6c42463031d9e057da87840 · patch: git.kernel.org/1fef6614673ff0846d30acdeeaf3cf98bb5f6116 · patch: git.kernel.org/8298834912d76dbc82c12b6b4ab7590ed2bb8ae5 · 1 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-64044 · cve.blacktree.nl