BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-63819High confidence

f2fs: fix to do sanity check on f2fs_get_node_folio_ra()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 17 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 22 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-45485

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to do sanity check on f2fs_get_node_folio_ra() kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/file.c:845! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5336 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x1115/0x1140 fs/f2fs/file.c:845 Code: fc fc 90 0f 0b e8 8b 9d 9a fd 90 0f 0b e8 83 9d 9a fd 48 89 df 48 c7 c6 60 d1 1a 8c e8 54 f1 fc fc 90 0f 0b e8 6c 9d 9a fd 90 <0f> 0b e8 64 9d 9a fd 90 0f 0b 90 e9 93 fd ff ff e8 56 9d 9a fd 90 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000e4474c0 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: ffffffff842b1d34 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000100000 RDX: ffffc9000f03a000 RSI: 0000000000035503 RDI: 0000000000035504 RBP: ffffc9000e447608 R08: ffff8880123b0000 R09: 0000000000000002 R10: 00000000fffffffe R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 1ffff92001c88ea0 R15: 00000000ffff039c FS: 00007f7e02ee36c0(0000) GS:ffff88808c887000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ff0305c4000 CR3: 0000000012d4c000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x10a/0x300 fs/f2fs/file.c:882 f2fs_truncate+0x471/0x7c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:940 f2fs_evict_inode+0xa3f/0x1ac0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:907 evict+0x61e/0xb10 fs/inode.c:841 f2fs_fill_super+0x5f43/0x78f0 fs/f2fs/super.c:5224 get_tree_bdev_flags+0x431/0x4f0 fs/super.c:1694 vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x2a0 fs/super.c:1754 fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1193 [inline] do_new_mount_fc fs/namespace.c:3758 [inline] do_new_mount+0x341/0xd30 fs/namespace.c:3834 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4167 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4383 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x31d/0x420 fs/namespace.c:4360 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x15f/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f count = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_folio, inode); count -= dn.ofs_in_node; f2fs_bug_on(sbi, count < 0); The fuzz test will trigger above bug_on in f2fs. The root cause should be: in the corrupted inode, there is a direct node which has the same ino and nid in its footer, so in f2fs_do_truncate_blocks(), after f2fs_get_dnode_of_data() finds such dnode: 1) ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_folio, inode) will return 923 2) once dn.ofs_in_node points to addr[923, 1017] Then it will trigger the system panic. Let's introduce NODE_TYPE_NON_IXNODE to indicate current node should not be an inode or xattr node, and then use it in below path to detect inconsistent node chain in inode mapping table: - f2fs_do_truncate_blocks - f2fs_get_dnode_of_data - f2fs_get_node_folio_ra - __get_node_folio - f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer - case NODE_TYPE_NON_IXNODE -> check whether it is inode|xnode

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to do sanity check on f2fs_get_node_folio_ra() kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/file.c:845! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5336 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x1115/0x1140 fs/f2fs/file.c:845 Code: fc fc 90 0f 0b e8 8b 9d 9a fd 90 0f 0b e8 83 9d 9a fd 48 89 df 48 c7 c6 60 d1 1a 8c e8 54 f1 fc fc 90 0f 0b e8 6c 9d 9a fd 90 <0f> 0b e8 64 9d 9a fd 90 0f 0b 90 e9 93 fd ff ff e8 56 9d 9a fd 90 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000e4474c0 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: ffffffff842b1d34 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000100000 RDX: ffffc9000f03a000 RSI: 0000000000035503 RDI: 0000000000035504 RBP: ffffc9000e447608 R08: ffff8880123b0000 R09: 0000000000000002 R10: 00000000fffffffe R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 1ffff92001c88ea0 R15: 00000000ffff039c FS: 00007f7e02ee36c0(0000) GS:ffff88808c887000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ff0305c4000 CR3: 0000000012d4c000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x10a/0x300 fs/f2fs/file.c:882 f2fs_truncate+0x471/0x7c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:940 f2fs_evict_inode+0xa3f/0x1ac0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:907 evict+0x61e/0xb10 fs/inode.c:841 f2fs_fill_super+0x5f43/0x78f0 fs/f2fs/super.c:5224 get_tree_bdev_flags+0x431/0x4f0 fs/super.c:1694 vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x2a0 fs/super.c:1754 fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1193 [inline] do_new_mount_fc fs/namespace.c:3758 [inline] do_new_mount+0x341/0xd30 fs/namespace.c:3834 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4167 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4383 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x31d/0x420 fs/namespace.c:4360 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x15f/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f count = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_folio, inode); count -= dn.ofs_in_node; f2fs_bug_on(sbi, count < 0); The fuzz test will trigger above bug_on in f2fs. The root cause should be: in the corrupted inode, there is a direct node which has the same ino and nid in its footer, so in f2fs_do_truncate_blocks(), after f2fs_get_dnode_of_data() finds such dnode: 1) ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_folio, inode) will return 923 2) once dn.ofs_in_node points to addr[923, 1017] Then it will trigger the system panic. Let's introduce NODE_TYPE_NON_IXNODE to indicate current node should not be an inode or xattr node, and then use it in below path to detect inconsistent node chain in inode mapping table: - f2fs_do_truncate_blocks - f2fs_get_dnode_of_data - f2fs_get_node_folio_ra - __get_node_folio - f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer - case NODE_TYPE_NON_IXNODE -> check whether it is inode|xnode

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to do sanity check on f2fs_get_node_folio_ra() kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/file.c:845! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5336 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x1115/0x1140 fs/f2fs/file.c:845 Code: fc fc 90 0f 0b e8 8b 9d 9a fd 90 0f 0b e8 83 9d 9a fd 48 89 df 48 c7 c6 60 d1 1a 8c e8 54 f1 fc fc 90 0f 0b e8 6c 9d 9a fd 90 <0f> 0b e8 64 9d 9a fd 90 0f 0b 90 e9 93 fd ff ff e8 56 9d 9a fd 90 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000e4474c0 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: ffffffff842b1d34 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000100000 RDX: ffffc9000f03a000 RSI: 0000000000035503 RDI: 0000000000035504 RBP: ffffc9000e447608 R08: ffff8880123b0000 R09: 0000000000000002 R10: 00000000fffffffe R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 1ffff92001c88ea0 R15: 00000000ffff039c FS: 00007f7e02ee36c0(0000) GS:ffff88808c887000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ff0305c4000 CR3: 0000000012d4c000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x10a/0x300 fs/f2fs/file.c:882 f2fs_truncate+0x471/0x7c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:940 f2fs_evict_inode+0xa3f/0x1ac0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:907 evict+0x61e/0xb10 fs/inode.c:841 f2fs_fill_super+0x5f43/0x78f0 fs/f2fs/super.c:5224 get_tree_bdev_flags+0x431/0x4f0 fs/super.c:1694 vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x2a0 fs/super.c:1754 fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1193 [inline] do_new_mount_fc fs/namespace.c:3758 [inline] do_new_mount+0x341/0xd30 fs/namespace.c:3834 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4167 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4383 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x31d/0x420 fs/namespace.c:4360 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x15f/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f count = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_folio, inode); count -= dn.ofs_in_node; f2fs_bug_on(sbi, count < 0); The fuzz test will trigger above bug_on in f2fs. The root cause should be: in the corrupted inode, there is a direct node which has the same ino and nid in its footer, so in f2fs_do_truncate_blocks(), after f2fs_get_dnode_of_data() finds such dnode: 1) ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_folio, inode) will return 923 2) once dn.ofs_in_node points to addr[923, 1017] Then it will trigger the system panic. Let's introduce NODE_TYPE_NON_IXNODE to indicate current node should not be an inode or xattr node, and then use it in below path to detect inconsistent node chain in inode mapping table: - f2fs_do_truncate_blocks - f2fs_get_dnode_of_data - f2fs_get_node_folio_ra - __get_node_folio - f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer - case NODE_TYPE_NON_IXNODE -> check whether it is inode|xnode

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2403Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260722Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026, published on 22 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-63809 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63810 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63811 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63813 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63814 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63815 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63816 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63817 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63818 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63820 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63821 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63822 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63823 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63825 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63826 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-63810 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63811 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63812 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63813 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63814 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63815 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63816 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63817 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63818 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63820 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63821 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63822 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63823 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63825 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63826 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-63810 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63811 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63812 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63813 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63814 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63815 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63816 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63817 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63818 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63820 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63821 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63822 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63823 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63825 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63826 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-63810 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63811 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63812 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63813 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63814 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63815 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63816 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63817 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63818 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63820 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63821 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63822 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63823 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63825 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63826 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 406c28af75123432d38cf9bbaa6f1476f7b14770, e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 0cc21c1ffe15b4156b0bf744f32fd1faef0b7c73, e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 8712353ed80f87271d732297567dcdbe4b84e8c7, 3.8
Fixed
Linux: < 3.8, 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jul 2026 · Last source change 17 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45485
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD awaiting enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 406c28af75123432d38cf9bbaa6f1476f7b14770; e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 0cc21c1ffe15b4156b0bf744f32fd1faef0b7c73; e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 8712353ed80f87271d732297567dcdbe4b84e8c7; 3.8 · Fixed: < 3.8; 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2-rc1 ≤ *
    After
    e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 406c28af75123432d38cf9bbaa6f1476f7b14770; e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 0cc21c1ffe15b4156b0bf744f32fd1faef0b7c73; e05df3b115e7308afbca652769b54e4549fcc723 < 8712353ed80f87271d732297567dcdbe4b84e8c7; 3.8 · Fixed: < 3.8; 6.18.39 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45485↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-63819 · cve.blacktree.nl