BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-63807High confidence

KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level

Linux · Linux

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-45473

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before* querying the max mapping level given the shadow page's gfn. Failure to pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to the slot's lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the lpage_info is vmalloc'd) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its PTEs) that extends "below" the bounds of a memslot. When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is greater than KVM's (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a "direct" shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page). The hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB mappings when dirty logging generates the guest > host mapping size case. When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page with a hugepage. But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory. The rmap entry added for the leaf mapping is correct and within bounds, but the gfn of the leaf SPTE's parent shadow page will be out of bounds. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc90000806ffc #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 1002a7067 PMD 10612f067 PTE 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 13 UID: 1000 PID: 757 Comm: mmu_stress_test Not tainted 7.1.0-rc1-48ce1e26eace-x86_pir_to_irr_comments-vm #341 PREEMPT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level+0x79/0x2b0 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_mmu_recover_huge_pages+0x21b/0x320 [kvm] kvm_set_memslot+0x1ee/0x590 [kvm] kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x3a1/0x4d0 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x9bf/0x15d0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0xb7/0xbb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f21c0f1a9bf </TASK> Don't bother pre-checking the bounds of the potential hugepage, i.e. don't check that e.g. sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level + 1) is also within the memslot, as the checks performed by kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level() are a superset of the basic bounds checks. I.e. pre-checking the full range would be a dubious micro-optimization.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before* querying the max mapping level given the shadow page's gfn. Failure to pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to the slot's lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the lpage_info is vmalloc'd) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its PTEs) that extends "below" the bounds of a memslot. When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is greater than KVM's (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a "direct" shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page). The hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB mappings when dirty logging generates the guest > host mapping size case. When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page with a hugepage. But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory. The rmap entry added for the leaf mapping is correct and within bounds, but the gfn of the leaf SPTE's parent shadow page will be out of bounds. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc90000806ffc #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 1002a7067 PMD 10612f067 PTE 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 13 UID: 1000 PID: 757 Comm: mmu_stress_test Not tainted 7.1.0-rc1-48ce1e26eace-x86_pir_to_irr_comments-vm #341 PREEMPT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level+0x79/0x2b0 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_mmu_recover_huge_pages+0x21b/0x320 [kvm] kvm_set_memslot+0x1ee/0x590 [kvm] kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x3a1/0x4d0 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x9bf/0x15d0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0xb7/0xbb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f21c0f1a9bf </TASK> Don't bother pre-checking the bounds of the potential hugepage, i.e. don't check that e.g. sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level + 1) is also within the memslot, as the checks performed by kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level() are a superset of the basic bounds checks. I.e. pre-checking the full range would be a dubious micro-optimization.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before* querying the max mapping level given the shadow page's gfn. Failure to pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to the slot's lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the lpage_info is vmalloc'd) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its PTEs) that extends "below" the bounds of a memslot. When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is greater than KVM's (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a "direct" shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page). The hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB mappings when dirty logging generates the guest > host mapping size case. When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page with a hugepage. But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory. The rmap entry added for the leaf mapping is correct and within bounds, but the gfn of the leaf SPTE's parent shadow page will be out of bounds. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc90000806ffc #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 1002a7067 PMD 10612f067 PTE 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 13 UID: 1000 PID: 757 Comm: mmu_stress_test Not tainted 7.1.0-rc1-48ce1e26eace-x86_pir_to_irr_comments-vm #341 PREEMPT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level+0x79/0x2b0 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_mmu_recover_huge_pages+0x21b/0x320 [kvm] kvm_set_memslot+0x1ee/0x590 [kvm] kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x3a1/0x4d0 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x9bf/0x15d0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0xb7/0xbb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f21c0f1a9bf </TASK> Don't bother pre-checking the bounds of the potential hugepage, i.e. don't check that e.g. sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level + 1) is also within the memslot, as the checks performed by kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level() are a superset of the basic bounds checks. I.e. pre-checking the full range would be a dubious micro-optimization.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2026-2403Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1091Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63802 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63807 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63809 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63821 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63822 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63826 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63829 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53400 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63802 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63807 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63809 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63821 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63822 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63826 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63827 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63829 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1029Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53388 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63802 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63807 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63826 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63829 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63884 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63893 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63901 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0983Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-43450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63807 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64531 Gestion détaillée du document le 07 août 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0957Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-53398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63798 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63800 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63801 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63803 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63807 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63808 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63809 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63814 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63817 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63822 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63823 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 7b52008023b7facf40fba3ebe92449bda8ea53b9; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 5cab1c989f938f5e1b9a0de66486f1fc2c28479b; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 48b91ed7e22bb82571c34f8b80b6ecdc90a6fab8; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < c5c29b3c268332afe67d598a034c58344540ed92; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 18587f9831612e24cd8f24be1ec15478feff7abc; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < b2ae3245ea44dccaa9af676b6747476951883318; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < ef057cbf825e03b63f6edf5980f96abf3c53089d; 5.12
Fixed
< 5.12; 5.15.211 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.177 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.144 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.95 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.38 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jul 2026 · Last source change 17 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45473
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 7b52008023b7facf40fba3ebe92449bda8ea53b9; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 5cab1c989f938f5e1b9a0de66486f1fc2c28479b; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 48b91ed7e22bb82571c34f8b80b6ecdc90a6fab8; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < c5c29b3c268332afe67d598a034c58344540ed92; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 18587f9831612e24cd8f24be1ec15478feff7abc; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < b2ae3245ea44dccaa9af676b6747476951883318; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < ef057cbf825e03b63f6edf5980f96abf3c53089d; 5.12 · Fixed: < 5.12; 5.15.211 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.177 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.144 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.95 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.38 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2-rc1 ≤ *
    After
    9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 7b52008023b7facf40fba3ebe92449bda8ea53b9; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 5cab1c989f938f5e1b9a0de66486f1fc2c28479b; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 48b91ed7e22bb82571c34f8b80b6ecdc90a6fab8; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < c5c29b3c268332afe67d598a034c58344540ed92; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < 18587f9831612e24cd8f24be1ec15478feff7abc; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < b2ae3245ea44dccaa9af676b6747476951883318; 9eba50f8d7fcb61774f160890f98239fa3ab68a6 < ef057cbf825e03b63f6edf5980f96abf3c53089d; 5.12 · Fixed: < 5.12; 5.15.211 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.177 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.144 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.95 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.38 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    CNA
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-63807 · cve.blacktree.nl