BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-63799High confidence

sched/mmcid: Fix OOB clear_bit when CID is MM_CID_UNSET in fixup path

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 17 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-45465

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/mmcid: Fix OOB clear_bit when CID is MM_CID_UNSET in fixup path In mm_cid_fixup_cpus_to_tasks(), when rq->curr has the target mm and mm_cid.active is set, the CID is checked with cid_in_transit() before setting the transition bit. In per-CPU mode a newly forked or exec'd task can be running with mm_cid.cid == MM_CID_UNSET because CIDs are assigned lazily on schedule-in. With cid_in_transit() the guard passes for MM_CID_UNSET (no transit bit), converts it to MM_CID_UNSET | MM_CID_TRANSIT and stores it back; later mm_cid_schedout() feeds this to clear_bit() with MM_CID_UNSET as the bit number, triggering an out-of-bounds write. Symptoms: this is genuine memory corruption, but a bounded out-of-bounds write, not an arbitrary one. MM_CID_UNSET is the fixed sentinel BIT(31), so once the bad value reaches mm_cid_schedout() the cid_from_transit_cid() strip leaves MM_CID_UNSET, which fails the "cid < max_cids" convergence test and falls into mm_drop_cid() -> clear_bit(MM_CID_UNSET, mm_cidmask(mm)). The cid bitmap is embedded in the mm_struct slab object (after cpu_bitmap and mm_cpus_allowed) and is only num_possible_cpus() bits wide, so clearing bit 31 is a deterministic OOB bit-clear at a fixed offset of 2^31 / 8 == 256 MiB past the bitmap base. The address is not attacker-influenced (fixed sentinel -> fixed offset) and the op only clears a single bit; what sits 256 MiB further along the direct map is whatever kernel object happens to live there, so this corrupts one bit of unpredictable kernel memory -- it is not an arbitrary-address or arbitrary-value write. It triggers only in per-CPU CID mode, when a CPU is running an active task of the target mm whose cid is still MM_CID_UNSET -- the fork()/execve() window before that task's next schedule-in assigns it a real CID -- and a per-CPU -> per-task fixup walks over it (the mode fallback driven by a thread exit, sched_mm_cid_exit(), or by the deferred max_cids recompute in mm_cid_work_fn()). In practice syzkaller surfaced it as a KASAN use-after-free reported in __schedule -> mm_cid_switch_to, where the offending clear_bit() is inlined via mm_cid_schedout() -> mm_drop_cid(). Guard the transition-bit assignment against MM_CID_UNSET, in addition to the existing cid_in_transit() check, so the bit is only set on a genuine task-owned CID. A CPU-owned (MM_CID_ONCPU) CID of a running active task is handled by the cid_on_cpu(pcp->cid) branch above and never reaches this path, so excluding MM_CID_UNSET (and the already-transitioning case) is sufficient.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/mmcid: Fix OOB clear_bit when CID is MM_CID_UNSET in fixup path In mm_cid_fixup_cpus_to_tasks(), when rq->curr has the target mm and mm_cid.active is set, the CID is checked with cid_in_transit() before setting the transition bit. In per-CPU mode a newly forked or exec'd task can be running with mm_cid.cid == MM_CID_UNSET because CIDs are assigned lazily on schedule-in. With cid_in_transit() the guard passes for MM_CID_UNSET (no transit bit), converts it to MM_CID_UNSET | MM_CID_TRANSIT and stores it back; later mm_cid_schedout() feeds this to clear_bit() with MM_CID_UNSET as the bit number, triggering an out-of-bounds write. Symptoms: this is genuine memory corruption, but a bounded out-of-bounds write, not an arbitrary one. MM_CID_UNSET is the fixed sentinel BIT(31), so once the bad value reaches mm_cid_schedout() the cid_from_transit_cid() strip leaves MM_CID_UNSET, which fails the "cid < max_cids" convergence test and falls into mm_drop_cid() -> clear_bit(MM_CID_UNSET, mm_cidmask(mm)). The cid bitmap is embedded in the mm_struct slab object (after cpu_bitmap and mm_cpus_allowed) and is only num_possible_cpus() bits wide, so clearing bit 31 is a deterministic OOB bit-clear at a fixed offset of 2^31 / 8 == 256 MiB past the bitmap base. The address is not attacker-influenced (fixed sentinel -> fixed offset) and the op only clears a single bit; what sits 256 MiB further along the direct map is whatever kernel object happens to live there, so this corrupts one bit of unpredictable kernel memory -- it is not an arbitrary-address or arbitrary-value write. It triggers only in per-CPU CID mode, when a CPU is running an active task of the target mm whose cid is still MM_CID_UNSET -- the fork()/execve() window before that task's next schedule-in assigns it a real CID -- and a per-CPU -> per-task fixup walks over it (the mode fallback driven by a thread exit, sched_mm_cid_exit(), or by the deferred max_cids recompute in mm_cid_work_fn()). In practice syzkaller surfaced it as a KASAN use-after-free reported in __schedule -> mm_cid_switch_to, where the offending clear_bit() is inlined via mm_cid_schedout() -> mm_drop_cid(). Guard the transition-bit assignment against MM_CID_UNSET, in addition to the existing cid_in_transit() check, so the bit is only set on a genuine task-owned CID. A CPU-owned (MM_CID_ONCPU) CID of a running active task is handled by the cid_on_cpu(pcp->cid) branch above and never reaches this path, so excluding MM_CID_UNSET (and the already-transitioning case) is sufficient.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/mmcid: Fix OOB clear_bit when CID is MM_CID_UNSET in fixup path In mm_cid_fixup_cpus_to_tasks(), when rq->curr has the target mm and mm_cid.active is set, the CID is checked with cid_in_transit() before setting the transition bit. In per-CPU mode a newly forked or exec'd task can be running with mm_cid.cid == MM_CID_UNSET because CIDs are assigned lazily on schedule-in. With cid_in_transit() the guard passes for MM_CID_UNSET (no transit bit), converts it to MM_CID_UNSET | MM_CID_TRANSIT and stores it back; later mm_cid_schedout() feeds this to clear_bit() with MM_CID_UNSET as the bit number, triggering an out-of-bounds write. Symptoms: this is genuine memory corruption, but a bounded out-of-bounds write, not an arbitrary one. MM_CID_UNSET is the fixed sentinel BIT(31), so once the bad value reaches mm_cid_schedout() the cid_from_transit_cid() strip leaves MM_CID_UNSET, which fails the "cid < max_cids" convergence test and falls into mm_drop_cid() -> clear_bit(MM_CID_UNSET, mm_cidmask(mm)). The cid bitmap is embedded in the mm_struct slab object (after cpu_bitmap and mm_cpus_allowed) and is only num_possible_cpus() bits wide, so clearing bit 31 is a deterministic OOB bit-clear at a fixed offset of 2^31 / 8 == 256 MiB past the bitmap base. The address is not attacker-influenced (fixed sentinel -> fixed offset) and the op only clears a single bit; what sits 256 MiB further along the direct map is whatever kernel object happens to live there, so this corrupts one bit of unpredictable kernel memory -- it is not an arbitrary-address or arbitrary-value write. It triggers only in per-CPU CID mode, when a CPU is running an active task of the target mm whose cid is still MM_CID_UNSET -- the fork()/execve() window before that task's next schedule-in assigns it a real CID -- and a per-CPU -> per-task fixup walks over it (the mode fallback driven by a thread exit, sched_mm_cid_exit(), or by the deferred max_cids recompute in mm_cid_work_fn()). In practice syzkaller surfaced it as a KASAN use-after-free reported in __schedule -> mm_cid_switch_to, where the offending clear_bit() is inlined via mm_cid_schedout() -> mm_drop_cid(). Guard the transition-bit assignment against MM_CID_UNSET, in addition to the existing cid_in_transit() check, so the bit is only set on a genuine task-owned CID. A CPU-owned (MM_CID_ONCPU) CID of a running active task is handled by the cid_on_cpu(pcp->cid) branch above and never reaches this path, so excluding MM_CID_UNSET (and the already-transitioning case) is sufficient.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2403Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260722Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jul 2026, published on 22 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53400 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63797 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63798 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63799 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63800 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63801 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63802 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63803 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63804 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63805 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53400 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63797 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63798 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63799 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63800 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63801 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63802 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63803 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63804 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63805 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53400 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63797 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63798 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63799 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63800 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63801 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63802 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63803 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63804 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63805 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53400 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63797 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63798 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63799 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63800 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63801 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63802 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63803 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63804 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63805 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-025918LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。sched/mmcid: fixupパスにおけるCIDがMM_CID_UNSETのときのclear_bitによる範囲外アクセス(OOB)を修正しました。mm_cid_fixup_cpus_to_tasks()関数では、rq->currが対象のmmを持ち、かつmm_cid.activeが設定されている場合、遷移ビットをセットする前にcid_in_transit()でCIDがチェックされます。パーCPUモードにおいては、スケジュールイン時にCIDが遅延割り当てされるため、新たにforkやexecされたタスクはmm_cid.cid == MM_CID_UNSETの状態で実行される可能性があります。cid_in_transit()はMM_CID_UNSET(遷移ビットなし)に対してガードを通過させ、それをMM_CID_UNSET | MM_CID_TRANSITに変換して保存します。その後、mm_cid_schedout()はこの値をビット番号としてMM_CID_UNSETをclear_bit()に渡し、範囲外の書き込みを引き起こします。症状としては、これは真のメモリ破壊でありながら任意書き込みではなく、範囲外アクセスの影響が限定的であることが特徴です。MM_CID_UNSETは固定のセントネルBIT(31)であるため、不正な値がmm_cid_schedout()に到達するとcid_from_transit_cid()がMM_CID_UNSETを残し、「cid < max_cids」検査に失敗し、mm_drop_cid() -> clear_bit(MM_CID_UNSET, mm_cidmask(mm))に入ります。cidビットマップはmm_structのslabオブジェクト内(cpu_bitmapとmm_cpus_allowedの後)に配置され、そのサイズはnum_possible_cpus()ビット分です。つまり、ビット31のクリアはビットマップの先から256MiB(2^31 / 8)離れた固定オフセットにおける決定的な範囲外のビットクリアとなります。このアドレスは攻撃者の制御外(固定セントネルによる固定オフセット)であり、操作は単一ビットのクリアに限られます。256MiB先のダイレクトマップ上のメモリにはカーネルオブジェクトのいずれかが配置されており、不特定のカーネルメモリの1ビットを破壊しますが、任意のアドレスや値への書き込みは発生しません。この問題はパーCPU CIDモードでのみ発生し、CIDがまだMM_CID_UNSETである対象mmのアクティブなタスクがCPUで実行されている場合に限られます。つまりfork()/execve()の直後で、そのタスクの次のスケジュールインまでに実際のCIDが割り当てられるまでの間に起こります。さらに、パーCPUからパータスクへのfixup処理(スレッドの終了に伴うモードフォールバックのsched_mm_cid_exit()やdeferred max_cidsの再計算(mm_cid_work_fn()))がこのタスクに適用される際にもトリガーされます。実際にはsyzkallerによって、__schedule -> mm_cid_switch_to内のuse-after-freeとしてKASANが検出しました。問題のclear_bit()はmm_cid_schedout() -> mm_drop_cid()を介してインライン展開されています。遷移ビットの割当てについては、既存のcid_in_transit()チェックに加えてMM_CID_UNSETに対してもガードを設けることで、真のタスク所有CIDのみがビットをセットされるように修正されました。実行中のアクティブなタスクのCPU所有CID(MM_CID_ONCPU)はcid_on_cpu(pcp->cid)の分岐で処理されるため、この経路には到達せず、MM_CID_UNSET(および既に遷移中のケース)を除外するだけで十分です。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: fbd0e71dc370af73f6b316e4de9eed273dd90340 < 8d32856fb72ba976d9c87ba405fd17e80419934c, fbd0e71dc370af73f6b316e4de9eed273dd90340 < de3ab9bd3133899efb92e4cd05ba4203e58fc0a3, 6.19
Fixed
Linux: < 6.19, 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jul 2026 · Last source change 17 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-45465
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    fbd0e71dc370af73f6b316e4de9eed273dd90340 < 8d32856fb72ba976d9c87ba405fd17e80419934c; fbd0e71dc370af73f6b316e4de9eed273dd90340 < de3ab9bd3133899efb92e4cd05ba4203e58fc0a3; 6.19 · Fixed: < 6.19; 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2-rc1 ≤ *
    After
    fbd0e71dc370af73f6b316e4de9eed273dd90340 < 8d32856fb72ba976d9c87ba405fd17e80419934c; fbd0e71dc370af73f6b316e4de9eed273dd90340 < de3ab9bd3133899efb92e4cd05ba4203e58fc0a3; 6.19 · Fixed: < 6.19; 7.1.3 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-63799 · cve.blacktree.nl