Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
- EPSS is 0.50% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE Intelligencekanboard · kanboard
High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
| Distribution release | Source package | Vendor state | Fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debian sidsid · source | kanboard | Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open. | Not published in this feed | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026 |
High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Fix availability varies by productKanboard through 1.2.52, fixed in commit 564cc30, BoardAjaxController save() method (used by the kanban board drag-and-drop endpoint) validates the caller's role on the attacker-supplied project_id but never verifies that the supplied task_id actually belongs to that project. Because task identifiers are sequential integers shared across the entire instance, any authenticated user who is a member of at least one project can enumerate and move (corrupt/hide) tasks belonging to any other project on the same instance, including private projects they have no membership or role on.
Kanboard through 1.2.52, fixed in commit 564cc30, BoardAjaxController save() method (used by the kanban board drag-and-drop endpoint) validates the caller's role on the attacker-supplied project_id but never verifies that the supplied task_id actually belongs to that project. Because task identifiers are sequential integers shared across the entire instance, any authenticated user who is a member of at least one project can enumerate and move (corrupt/hide) tasks belonging to any other project on the same instance, including private projects they have no membership or role on.
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
Kanboard through 1.2.52, fixed in commit 564cc30, BoardAjaxController save() method (used by the kanban board drag-and-drop endpoint) validates the caller's role on the attacker-supplied project_id but never verifies that the supplied task_id actually belongs to that project. Because task identifiers are sequential integers shared across the entire instance, any authenticated user who is a member of at least one project can enumerate and move (corrupt/hide) tasks belonging to any other project on the same instance, including private projects they have no membership or role on.
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
CISA Vulnrichment records proof-of-concept exploitation in its SSVC data. BlackTree has not independently executed or validated exploit material.
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key. The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 15 Jul 2026 · Last source change 15 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC · CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.