BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-57819High confidence

Apache CXF: No default restriction on the amount of form parameters per message

Apache Software Foundation · Apache CXF

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 631 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.73% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Apache Software Foundation Apache CXF and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 631 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-57819 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product SecurityApache CXF: Apache CXF: Denial of Service via uncontrolled form parameters
631 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • camel-cxf-common as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • camel-cxf-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • camel-cxf-transport as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • camel-quarkus-cxf-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • camel-quarkus-cxf-soap-deployment as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • cxf-core as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • cxf-integration-tracing-opentelemetry as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • cxf-rt-bindings-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • cxf-rt-bindings-xml as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • cxf-rt-features-logging as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
  • cxf-rt-features-metrics as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3
Summary
A flaw was found in Apache CXF. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to initiate a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. The issue arises because the component does not enforce a default limit on the number of form parameters processed in a JAX-RS message, enabling an attacker to send requests with an excessive quantity of parameters, leading to resource exhaustion.
Remediation
Update Apache CXF to the latest version that includes the fix. Configure form parameter limits in application settings to prevent resource exhaustion attacks.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-53852

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 631 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

Apache CXF allows to set a limit on the number of form parameters in a JAX-RS message via the "maxFormParameterCount" configuration option. However, no default limit is set which may lead to denial of service attacks when processing  requests with very large numbers of form parameters. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue by using a default limit of 500 parameters.

What

Apache CXF allows to set a limit on the number of form parameters in a JAX-RS message via the "maxFormParameterCount" configuration option. However, no default limit is set which may lead to denial of service attacks when processing  requests with very large numbers of form parameters. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue by using a default limit of 500 parameters.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

Apache CXF allows to set a limit on the number of form parameters in a JAX-RS message via the "maxFormParameterCount" configuration option. However, no default limit is set which may lead to denial of service attacks when processing  requests with very large numbers of form parameters. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue by using a default limit of 500 parameters.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Uncontrolled Resource Consumption → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-400 ↗

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-400
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2867RealObjects PDFreactor: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in RealObjects PDFreactor ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2682Apache CXF: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apache CXF ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260812Security Bulletin 12 Aug 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 12 Aug 2026, published on 12 August 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
INCIBE-CERT · Spanish · multiples-vulnerabilidades-en-ibm-websphere-application-serverMúltiples vulnerabilidades en IBM WebSphere Application Server

IBM ha publicado 4 vulnerabilidades: 1 de severidad crítica y 3 de severidad alta que, en caso de ser explotadas, podrían permitir a un atacante omitir la autenticación o provocar una denegación de servicio.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1206Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2026-54289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54290 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54531 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-57204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-57819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59937 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59938 Référence CVE CVE-2026-60147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2026-55760 Référence CVE CVE-2026-55831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55831 Référence CVE CVE-2026-55833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55833 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5588 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-56624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-56745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-56746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56746 Référence CVE CVE-2026-56819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-57819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-58059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-58060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-58061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-58062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-58063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-55653 Référence CVE CVE-2026-55655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55655 Référence CVE CVE-2026-55693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55693 Référence CVE CVE-2026-55798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55798 Référence CVE CVE-2026-55955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55955 Référence CVE CVE-2026-55956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55956 Référence CVE CVE-2026-56852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-57455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-57456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57456 Référence CVE CVE-2026-57819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-58016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1067Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-47059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48959 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48962 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-57819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59879 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59880 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59995 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-59999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-60000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60000 Référence CVE CVE-2026-60001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

VERecord?id=CVE-2026-4800 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5588 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-57819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57819 Référence CVE CVE-2026-60147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64958 Référence CVE CVE-2026-7246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-7771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-8400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8400 Référence CVE CVE-2026-8646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8646 Référence CVE CVE-2026-9002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9002 Référence CVE CVE-2026-9071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-90

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-027394Apache Software FoundationのApache CXFにおけるリソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性

Apache CXF では、JAX-RS メッセージ内のフォームパラメータ数に対して「maxFormParameterCount」設定オプションを使って制限を設定できます。しかし、デフォルトの制限値が設定されていないため、非常に多くのフォームパラメータを含むリクエストを処理する際にサービス拒否(DoS)攻撃を受ける可能性があります。ユーザーには、本問題を修正しデフォルトで500パラメータの制限を設けているバージョン4.2.3、4.1.8、または3.6.12にアップグレードすることを推奨します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Update Apache CXF to the latest version that includes the fix. Configure form parameter limits in application settings to prevent resource exhaustion attacks.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 Aug 2026 · Last source change 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC · CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-53852
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    camel-cxf-common as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; camel-cxf-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; camel-cxf-transport as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; camel-quarkus-cxf-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; camel-quarkus-cxf-soap-deployment as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-core as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-integration-tracing-opentelemetry as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-bindings-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-bindings-xml as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-features-logging as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-features-metrics as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-frontend-simple as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-management as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-rs-json-basic as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-rs-security-jose as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-security as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-security-saml as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-transports-http as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-addr as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-mex as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-policy as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-rm as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-security as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-wsdl as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-services-sts-core as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-tools-common as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-tools-java2ws as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-tools-validator as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; and 682 more
    After
    camel-cxf-common as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; camel-cxf-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; camel-cxf-transport as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; camel-quarkus-cxf-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; camel-quarkus-cxf-soap-deployment as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-core as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-integration-tracing-opentelemetry as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-bindings-soap as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-bindings-xml as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-features-logging as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-features-metrics as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-frontend-simple as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-management as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-rs-json-basic as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-rs-security-jose as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-security as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-security-saml as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-transports-http as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-addr as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-mex as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-policy as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-rm as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-ws-security as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-rt-wsdl as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-services-sts-core as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-tools-common as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-tools-java2ws as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; cxf-tools-validator as a component of Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; and 601 more
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-57819 · cve.blacktree.nl