BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-54275High confidence

AIOHTTP: TLS Server Hostname Override Is Ignored When Reusing HTTPS Connections

aio-libs · aiohttp

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-4M7W-QMGQ-4WJ5 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

2.7LowCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Scheduled

Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityLowOperational priority:Low, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.47% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs aio-libs aiohttp and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcepython-aiohttpAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcepython-aiohttpNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcepython-aiohttpVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.14.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcepython-aiohttpVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.14.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · esm-appspython-aiohttpUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges2 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
PyPIaiohttpECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 3.14.13.14.1OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
pipaiohttp<= 3.14.03.14.1GitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 15 Jun 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-38312

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.1, the server_hostname TLS SNI check can be bypassed when an existing connection is reused. If an application makes multiple requests to the same domain, but with different per-request server_hostname parameters, then the later calls may succeed by reusing the existing connection when they should have been rejected due to the TLS SNI check. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.14.1.

What

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.1, the server_hostname TLS SNI check can be bypassed when an existing connection is reused. If an application makes multiple requests to the same domain, but with different per-request server_hostname parameters, then the later calls may succeed by reusing the existing connection when they should have been rejected due to the TLS SNI check. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.14.1.

Why

The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.1, the server_hostname TLS SNI check can be bypassed when an existing connection is reused. If an application makes multiple requests to the same domain, but with different per-request server_hostname parameters, then the later calls may succeed by reusing the existing connection when they should have been rejected due to the TLS SNI check. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.14.1.

Why

The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-297 ↗

CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch. The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCLowVulnerable-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.VILowVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.VANoneVulnerable-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-297
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260624Security Bulletin 24 June 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 June 2026, published on 24 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-53550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0933Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-53538 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53539 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-021255AIOHTTPにおけるホストの不一致による証明書の検証に関する脆弱性

AIOHTTPは、asyncioおよびPython向けの非同期HTTPクライアント/サーバーフレームワークです。バージョン3.14.1より前のバージョンでは、既存の接続が再利用される場合にserver_hostnameのTLS SNIチェックが回避される可能性がありました。アプリケーションが同じドメインに対して複数のリクエストを行い、それぞれに異なるserver_hostnameパラメータを指定すると、本来TLS SNIチェックで拒否されるべきリクエストが既存の接続を再利用することで成功してしまう場合があります。この脆弱性はバージョン3.14.1で修正されています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
aiohttp: < 3.14.1
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Jun 2026 · Last source change 22 Jun 2026, 17:27 UTC · CWE-297 · Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38312
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-54275 · cve.blacktree.nl