BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-53906High confidence

Path Disclosure and Path Traversal in MCO

MyComplianceOffice · MCO

5.1MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.52% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs MyComplianceOffice MCO and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-40952

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

MCO is vulnerable to Path Disclosure and Path Traversal in file handling functionality related to data export and upload. Improper validation of the filename parameter allows writing files to arbitrary locations as well as indirect disclosure of absolute server paths through error messages. Because vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 25.3.3.1 but may also affect other versions.

What

MCO is vulnerable to Path Disclosure and Path Traversal in file handling functionality related to data export and upload. Improper validation of the filename parameter allows writing files to arbitrary locations as well as indirect disclosure of absolute server paths through error messages. Because vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 25.3.3.1 but may also affect other versions.

Why

Attacker-controlled path data is not constrained to the intended directory before the application accesses a file.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

MCO is vulnerable to Path Disclosure and Path Traversal in file handling functionality related to data export and upload. Improper validation of the filename parameter allows writing files to arbitrary locations as well as indirect disclosure of absolute server paths through error messages. Because vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 25.3.3.1 but may also affect other versions.

Why

Attacker-controlled path data is not constrained to the intended directory before the application accesses a file.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
High: elevated access is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-22 ↗

CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'). The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRHighPrivileges required: The attacker needs elevated or administrative privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VANoneVulnerable-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SCLowSubsequent-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SILowSubsequent-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-22
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260708Security Bulletin 8 July 2026 [PDF, 1MB]]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 8 July 2026 [PDF, 1MB]], published on 8 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-022536MyComplianceOfficeにおける複数の脆弱性

MCOは、データのエクスポートおよびアップロードに関連するファイル処理機能において、パス情報の漏洩およびパストラバーサルの脆弱性を有しています。filenameパラメータの不適切な検証により、任意の場所へのファイル書き込みや、エラーメッセージを通じてサーバーの絶対パス情報が間接的に漏洩する可能性があります。ベンダーへの連絡が不成功に終わったため、本脆弱性はバージョン25.3.3.1でのみ確認されていますが、他のバージョンにも影響を及ぼす可能性があります。

Official advisory ↗
CERT Polska · Polish · CVE-2026-53902CERT Polska w social mediach

CERT Polska otrzymał zgłoszenie o podatnościach w oprogramowaniu MyComplianceOffice MCO i koordynował proces ujawniania informacji. Podatność CVE-2026-53902 : MCO nie wymusza prawidłowej weryfikacji uprawnień w endpoincie /customer/servlet/mco/webapi/profile-sections/group-membership . Uwierzytelniony użytkownik może zmienić swoją przynależność do grup bez odpowiedniej weryfikacji, co umożliwia podniesienie swoich uprawnień. Atakujący może dodać się do dowolnych grup, podając prawidłowy identyfikator grupy, który może zostać uzyskany za pośrednictwem innych funkcjonalności aplikacji (np. /customer/servlet/mco/webapi/group/picker/groups ), jeśli posiada niezbędne uprawnienia, lub potencjalnie wywnioskowany za pomocą technik brute-force. Podatność CVE-2026-53903 : W MCO zidentyfikowano podatność typu Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) w endpoincie /customer/servlet/mco/webapi/trading-document/fetchPdfStatement . Aplikacja nie sprawdza, czy uwierzytelniony użytkownik jest uprawniony do dostępu do żądanego dokumentu. Daje to możliwość bezpośredniego pobrania dokumentów wyłącznie na podstawie identyfikatora dostarczonego przez użytkownika. Choć wykorzystanie podatności wymaga odgadnięcia identyfikatora, przewidywalne wzorce identyfikatorów umożliwiają przeprowadzenie enumeracji, co prowadzi do nieautoryzowanego ujawnienia wrażliwych informacji. Podatność CVE-2026-53904 : W MCO zidentyfikowano podatność typu Account Denial of Service z powodu nieprawidłowej implementacji funkcjonalności resetowania hasła. Każde żądanie resetowania hasła unieważnia wcześniej ustawione hasło, a także wcześniej wydane hasła tymczasowe; ponadto możliwość resetowania haseł nie jest w żaden sposób ograniczona. Atakujący, który zna adres e-mail ofiary oraz odpowie na jej pytanie zabezpieczające, może pomyślnie zainicjować proces resetowania hasła i stale unieważniać poświadczenia, skutecznie blokując ofierze dostęp do jej konta. Odpowiadanie na pytania zabezpieczające ma ograniczoną liczbę prób, co zmniejsza ryzyko wykorzystania tej podatności. Podatność CVE-2026-53905 : MCO nie wymusza prawidłowej weryfikacji uprawnień w endpoincie /customer/servlet/mco/webapi/admin-view-hierarchy/get-acl-tree-structure . Uwierzytelniony użytkownik o niskich uprawnieniach może pobrać struktury kontroli dostępu administratora bez odpowiedniej weryfikacji autoryzacji. Może to ujawnić wrażliwe mapowania uprawnień i szczegóły konfiguracji wewnętrznej. Podatność CVE-2026-53906 : W MCO zidentyfikowano podatności typu Path Disclosure i Path Traversal w funkcjonalności obsługi plików związanej z eksportem i przesyłaniem danych. Niewłaściwa walidacja parametru filename umożliwia zapisywanie plików w dowolnych lokalizacjach, a także pośrednie ujawnienie bezwzględnych ścieżek serwera za pośrednictwem komunikatów o błędach. Podatność CVE-2026-53907 : W MCO zidentyfikowano podatność typu Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) poprzez funkcjonalność przesyłania logo aplikacji. Atakujący mający możliwość zmiany logo aplikacji może przesłać spreparowany plik SVG zawierający złośliwy kod JavaScript, który jest wykonywany po wyrenderowaniu lub otwarciu logo. Podatność CVE-2026-53908 : MCO pozwala na enumerację użytkowników w funkcjonalnościach związanych z uwierzytelnianiem. Aplikacja zwraca różniące się odpowiedzi dla istniejących i nieistniejących użytkowników podczas operacji przypominania nazwy użytkownika i resetowania hasła. Atakujący może wykorzystać te różnice do enumeracji prawidłowych nazw użytkowników i adresów e-mail. Podatność CVE-2026-53909 : MCO nie przeprowadza poprawnej walidacji typów przesyłanych plików. Walidacja przesyłanych plików jest przeprowadzana wyłącznie po stronie klienta i jest możliwa do ominięcia. Uwierzytelniony atakujący z niskimi uprawnieniami może przesyłać na serwer pliki dowolnego typu. Ponieważ próby kontaktu z producentem były nieudane, podatności zostały potwierdzone jedynie w wersji 25.3.3.1, jednak mogą one dotyczyć również innych wersji.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
MCO: 25.3.3.1
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Jul 2026 · Last source change 1 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC · CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-40952
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-53906 · cve.blacktree.nl