BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-53346High confidence

rust: arm64: set uwtable llvm module flag for CONFIG_UNWIND_TABLES

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 1 Jul 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-40980

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust: arm64: set uwtable llvm module flag for CONFIG_UNWIND_TABLES Due to a rustc bug [1] the -Cforce-unwind-tables=y flag only emits the uwtable annotation for functions, but not for the module. This means that compiler-generated functions such as 'asan.module_ctor' do not receive the uwtable annotation. When CONFIG_UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCS is enabled, this leads to boot failures because the dwarf information emitted for the kasan constructors is wrong, which causes the SCS boot patching code to patch the constructor in an illegal manner. Specifically, the paciasp instruction is patched, but the autiasp instruction is not. This mismatch leads to a crash when the constructor is called during boot. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x90 Read of size 8 at addr ffffffe3cc7eb488 by task swapper/0/1 Specifically the faulting instruction is the (*fn)() to invoke the constructor in do_ctors() of the init/main.c file. Once the fix lands in rustc, this flag can be made conditional on the rustc version. Note that passing the flag on a rustc with the fix present has no effect. [ The fix [1] has landed for Rust 1.98.0 (expected release on 2026-08-20). Thus add a version check as discussed. - Miguel ] [ Adjusted link and comment. - Miguel ]

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust: arm64: set uwtable llvm module flag for CONFIG_UNWIND_TABLES Due to a rustc bug [1] the -Cforce-unwind-tables=y flag only emits the uwtable annotation for functions, but not for the module. This means that compiler-generated functions such as 'asan.module_ctor' do not receive the uwtable annotation. When CONFIG_UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCS is enabled, this leads to boot failures because the dwarf information emitted for the kasan constructors is wrong, which causes the SCS boot patching code to patch the constructor in an illegal manner. Specifically, the paciasp instruction is patched, but the autiasp instruction is not. This mismatch leads to a crash when the constructor is called during boot. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x90 Read of size 8 at addr ffffffe3cc7eb488 by task swapper/0/1 Specifically the faulting instruction is the (*fn)() to invoke the constructor in do_ctors() of the init/main.c file. Once the fix lands in rustc, this flag can be made conditional on the rustc version. Note that passing the flag on a rustc with the fix present has no effect. [ The fix [1] has landed for Rust 1.98.0 (expected release on 2026-08-20). Thus add a version check as discussed. - Miguel ] [ Adjusted link and comment. - Miguel ]

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust: arm64: set uwtable llvm module flag for CONFIG_UNWIND_TABLES Due to a rustc bug [1] the -Cforce-unwind-tables=y flag only emits the uwtable annotation for functions, but not for the module. This means that compiler-generated functions such as 'asan.module_ctor' do not receive the uwtable annotation. When CONFIG_UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCS is enabled, this leads to boot failures because the dwarf information emitted for the kasan constructors is wrong, which causes the SCS boot patching code to patch the constructor in an illegal manner. Specifically, the paciasp instruction is patched, but the autiasp instruction is not. This mismatch leads to a crash when the constructor is called during boot. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x90 Read of size 8 at addr ffffffe3cc7eb488 by task swapper/0/1 Specifically the faulting instruction is the (*fn)() to invoke the constructor in do_ctors() of the init/main.c file. Once the fix lands in rustc, this flag can be made conditional on the rustc version. Note that passing the flag on a rustc with the fix present has no effect. [ The fix [1] has landed for Rust 1.98.0 (expected release on 2026-08-20). Thus add a version check as discussed. - Miguel ] [ Adjusted link and comment. - Miguel ]

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2175Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise das Auslösen eines Denial-of-Service-Zustands, die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen oder das Verursachen von Speicherbeschädigungen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260708Security Bulletin 8 July 2026 [PDF, 1MB]]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 8 July 2026 [PDF, 1MB]], published on 8 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53340 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53344 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53346 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53347 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53353 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53340 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53344 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53346 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53347 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53353 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53340 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53344 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53346 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53347 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53353 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53340 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53344 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53346 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53347 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53353 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-024891LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。rust: arm64: CONFIG_UNWIND_TABLES用にuwtable llvmモジュールフラグを設定しました。rustcのバグ[1]により、-Cforce-unwind-tables=yフラグは関数に対してのみuwtableアノテーションを出力し、モジュールには出力しませんでした。このため、'asan.module_ctor'のようなコンパイラ生成関数はuwtableアノテーションを受け取りませんでした。CONFIG_UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCSが有効な場合、kasanコンストラクタに対して発行されるdwarf情報が誤っているためにブート失敗が発生します。これにより、SCSブートパッチコードがコンストラクタを不正な方法でパッチし、具体的にはpaciasp命令はパッチされますがautiasp命令はパッチされません。この不整合が原因で、起動時にコンストラクタ呼び出し時にクラッシュが発生します。==================================================================BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x90サイズ8の読み取りがアドレスffffffe3cc7eb488でタスクswapper/0/1によって発生しました。具体的には、init/main.cのdo_ctors()内でコンストラクタを呼び出す(*fn)()の命令が原因です。この修正がrustcに適用され次第、このフラグはrustcのバージョンによって条件付きで付加可能となります。修正済みのrustcにこのフラグを渡しても効果はありません。[修正[1]はRust 1.98.0(2026年8月20日リリース予定)に適用済みです。したがって、議論通りバージョンチェックを追加してください。 - Miguel][リンクとコメントを調整しました。- Miguel]

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: d077242d68a31075ef5f5da041bf8f6fc19aa231 < bde772ee239720af216fb0b14753971059e132dc, d077242d68a31075ef5f5da041bf8f6fc19aa231 < d0f25a1755f2c15b1746379c8d9d7dfde85f58f5, d077242d68a31075ef5f5da041bf8f6fc19aa231 < 7de13410f59e59b21d3c268a6e22d40f5d9d8a54, d077242d68a31075ef5f5da041bf8f6fc19aa231 < ac35b5580ace12e5d0a0b5e61e36d2c4e1ffa29c, 6.12
Fixed
Linux: < 6.12, 6.12.94 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.36 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.13 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Jul 2026 · Last source change 1 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-40980
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-53346 · cve.blacktree.nl