BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-53331High confidence

slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: Avoid ABBA on tx_lock/ctrl->lock

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 1 Jul 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-53331 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-53331
180 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: Avoid ABBA on tx_lock/ctrl->lock During the SSR/PDR down notification the tx_lock is taken with the intent to provide synchronization with active DMA transfers. But during this period qcom_slim_ngd_down() is invoked, which ends up in slim_report_absent(), which takes the slim_controller lock. In multiple other codepaths these two locks are taken in the opposite order (i.e. slim_controller then tx_lock). The result is a lockdep splat, and a possible deadlock: rprocctl/449 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00009793e620 (&ctrl->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: slim_report_absent (drivers/slimbus/core.c:322) slimbus but task is already holding lock: ffff00009793fb50 (&ctrl->tx_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify (drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c:1475) slim_qcom_ngd_ctrl which lock already depends on the new lock. Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); The assumption is that the comment refers to the desire to not call qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() while we have an ongoing DMA TX transaction. But any such transaction is initiated and completed within a single qcom_slim_ngd_xfer_msg(). Prior to calling qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() the slim_controller is torn down, all child devices are notified that the slimbus is gone and the child devices are removed. Stop taking the tx_lock in qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify() to avoid the deadlock.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-40965

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: Avoid ABBA on tx_lock/ctrl->lock During the SSR/PDR down notification the tx_lock is taken with the intent to provide synchronization with active DMA transfers. But during this period qcom_slim_ngd_down() is invoked, which ends up in slim_report_absent(), which takes the slim_controller lock. In multiple other codepaths these two locks are taken in the opposite order (i.e. slim_controller then tx_lock). The result is a lockdep splat, and a possible deadlock: rprocctl/449 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00009793e620 (&ctrl->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: slim_report_absent (drivers/slimbus/core.c:322) slimbus but task is already holding lock: ffff00009793fb50 (&ctrl->tx_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify (drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c:1475) slim_qcom_ngd_ctrl which lock already depends on the new lock. Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); The assumption is that the comment refers to the desire to not call qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() while we have an ongoing DMA TX transaction. But any such transaction is initiated and completed within a single qcom_slim_ngd_xfer_msg(). Prior to calling qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() the slim_controller is torn down, all child devices are notified that the slimbus is gone and the child devices are removed. Stop taking the tx_lock in qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify() to avoid the deadlock.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: Avoid ABBA on tx_lock/ctrl->lock During the SSR/PDR down notification the tx_lock is taken with the intent to provide synchronization with active DMA transfers. But during this period qcom_slim_ngd_down() is invoked, which ends up in slim_report_absent(), which takes the slim_controller lock. In multiple other codepaths these two locks are taken in the opposite order (i.e. slim_controller then tx_lock). The result is a lockdep splat, and a possible deadlock: rprocctl/449 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00009793e620 (&ctrl->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: slim_report_absent (drivers/slimbus/core.c:322) slimbus but task is already holding lock: ffff00009793fb50 (&ctrl->tx_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify (drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c:1475) slim_qcom_ngd_ctrl which lock already depends on the new lock. Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); The assumption is that the comment refers to the desire to not call qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() while we have an ongoing DMA TX transaction. But any such transaction is initiated and completed within a single qcom_slim_ngd_xfer_msg(). Prior to calling qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() the slim_controller is torn down, all child devices are notified that the slimbus is gone and the child devices are removed. Stop taking the tx_lock in qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify() to avoid the deadlock.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: Avoid ABBA on tx_lock/ctrl->lock During the SSR/PDR down notification the tx_lock is taken with the intent to provide synchronization with active DMA transfers. But during this period qcom_slim_ngd_down() is invoked, which ends up in slim_report_absent(), which takes the slim_controller lock. In multiple other codepaths these two locks are taken in the opposite order (i.e. slim_controller then tx_lock). The result is a lockdep splat, and a possible deadlock: rprocctl/449 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00009793e620 (&ctrl->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: slim_report_absent (drivers/slimbus/core.c:322) slimbus but task is already holding lock: ffff00009793fb50 (&ctrl->tx_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify (drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c:1475) slim_qcom_ngd_ctrl which lock already depends on the new lock. Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); The assumption is that the comment refers to the desire to not call qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() while we have an ongoing DMA TX transaction. But any such transaction is initiated and completed within a single qcom_slim_ngd_xfer_msg(). Prior to calling qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() the slim_controller is torn down, all child devices are notified that the slimbus is gone and the child devices are removed. Stop taking the tx_lock in qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify() to avoid the deadlock.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2175Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise das Auslösen eines Denial-of-Service-Zustands, die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen oder das Verursachen von Speicherbeschädigungen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260708Security Bulletin 8 July 2026 [PDF, 1MB]]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 8 July 2026 [PDF, 1MB]], published on 8 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53322 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53323 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53324 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53326 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53330 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53335 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53322 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53323 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53324 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53326 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53330 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53335 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53326 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53330 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53335 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53322 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53323 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53324 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53326 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53330 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53335 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1091Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53324 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53369 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53374 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53375 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53313 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53317 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53324 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53347 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-53303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53314 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53320 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53337 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-024991LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrlにおいて、tx_lockおよびctrl-＞lockのABBAロック回避方法に関する問題がありました。SSR/PDRのダウン通知時に、tx_lockはアクティブなDMA転送と同期を取るために取得されます。しかし、この期間中にqcom_slim_ngd_down()が呼び出され、その中でslim_report_absent()が実行されてslim_controllerロックが取得されます。複数の他のコードパスでは、これら2つのロックは逆の順序（つまり、slim_controllerロックの後にtx_lock）で取得されています。その結果、lockdepのエラー（スプラット）が発生し、デッドロックの可能性が生じていました。rprocctl/449は以下のロックを取得しようとしています: ffff00009793e620 (&ctrl-＞lock){+.+.}-{4:4}、実行箇所は slim_report_absent (drivers/slimbus/core.c:322) です。しかし、タスクは既に以下のロックを保持しています: ffff00009793fb50 (&ctrl-＞tx_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}、実行箇所は qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify (drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c:1475) です。このロックは新しいロックに依存しています。危険なロック取得シナリオの例: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ctrl-＞tx_lock); lock(&ctrl-＞lock); lock(&ctrl-＞lock); lock(&ctrl-＞tx_lock);コメントの前提としては、進行中のDMA送信トランザクションがある間にqcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma()を呼び出さないことを意図しています。しかし、このようなトランザクションはすべて単一のqcom_slim_ngd_xfer_msg()内で開始され完了します。qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma()が呼び出される前に、slim_controllerは解体され、すべての子デバイスにslimbusが消えたことが通知され、その後子デバイスは削除されます。デッドロックを回避するために、qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify()内でtx_lockを取得する処理を停止します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.11, 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.94 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.36 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.13 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Jul 2026 · Last source change 1 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-40965
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-40965↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-53331 · cve.blacktree.nl