BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-53197High confidence

xfrm: iptfs: fix ABBA deadlock in iptfs_destroy_state()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 25 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.09% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-39288

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: iptfs: fix ABBA deadlock in iptfs_destroy_state() iptfs_destroy_state() calls hrtimer_cancel() while holding a spinlock that the timer callback also acquires, leading to an ABBA deadlock on SMP systems. For the output timer (iptfs_timer): - iptfs_destroy_state() holds x->lock, calls hrtimer_cancel() - iptfs_delay_timer() callback takes x->lock For the drop timer (drop_timer): - iptfs_destroy_state() holds drop_lock, calls hrtimer_cancel() - iptfs_drop_timer() callback takes drop_lock Both timers use HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT, so their callbacks run in softirq context. When hrtimer_cancel() is called for a soft timer that is currently executing on another CPU, hrtimer_cancel_wait_running() spins on softirq_expiry_lock -- the same lock held by the softirq running the callback. If the callback is blocked waiting for the spinlock held by the caller of hrtimer_cancel(), a circular dependency forms: CPU 0: holds lock_A -> waits for softirq_expiry_lock CPU 1: holds softirq_expiry_lock -> waits for lock_A Fix by calling hrtimer_cancel() before acquiring the respective locks. hrtimer_cancel() is safe to call without holding any lock and will wait for any in-progress callback to complete. For the output timer, the lock is still acquired afterwards to drain the packet queue. For the drop timer, the lock/unlock pair is removed entirely since it only existed to serialize with the timer callback, which hrtimer_cancel() already guarantees. Found by source code audit.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: iptfs: fix ABBA deadlock in iptfs_destroy_state() iptfs_destroy_state() calls hrtimer_cancel() while holding a spinlock that the timer callback also acquires, leading to an ABBA deadlock on SMP systems. For the output timer (iptfs_timer): - iptfs_destroy_state() holds x->lock, calls hrtimer_cancel() - iptfs_delay_timer() callback takes x->lock For the drop timer (drop_timer): - iptfs_destroy_state() holds drop_lock, calls hrtimer_cancel() - iptfs_drop_timer() callback takes drop_lock Both timers use HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT, so their callbacks run in softirq context. When hrtimer_cancel() is called for a soft timer that is currently executing on another CPU, hrtimer_cancel_wait_running() spins on softirq_expiry_lock -- the same lock held by the softirq running the callback. If the callback is blocked waiting for the spinlock held by the caller of hrtimer_cancel(), a circular dependency forms: CPU 0: holds lock_A -> waits for softirq_expiry_lock CPU 1: holds softirq_expiry_lock -> waits for lock_A Fix by calling hrtimer_cancel() before acquiring the respective locks. hrtimer_cancel() is safe to call without holding any lock and will wait for any in-progress callback to complete. For the output timer, the lock is still acquired afterwards to drain the packet queue. For the drop timer, the lock/unlock pair is removed entirely since it only existed to serialize with the timer callback, which hrtimer_cancel() already guarantees. Found by source code audit.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: iptfs: fix ABBA deadlock in iptfs_destroy_state() iptfs_destroy_state() calls hrtimer_cancel() while holding a spinlock that the timer callback also acquires, leading to an ABBA deadlock on SMP systems. For the output timer (iptfs_timer): - iptfs_destroy_state() holds x->lock, calls hrtimer_cancel() - iptfs_delay_timer() callback takes x->lock For the drop timer (drop_timer): - iptfs_destroy_state() holds drop_lock, calls hrtimer_cancel() - iptfs_drop_timer() callback takes drop_lock Both timers use HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT, so their callbacks run in softirq context. When hrtimer_cancel() is called for a soft timer that is currently executing on another CPU, hrtimer_cancel_wait_running() spins on softirq_expiry_lock -- the same lock held by the softirq running the callback. If the callback is blocked waiting for the spinlock held by the caller of hrtimer_cancel(), a circular dependency forms: CPU 0: holds lock_A -> waits for softirq_expiry_lock CPU 1: holds softirq_expiry_lock -> waits for lock_A Fix by calling hrtimer_cancel() before acquiring the respective locks. hrtimer_cancel() is safe to call without holding any lock and will wait for any in-progress callback to complete. For the output timer, the lock is still acquired afterwards to drain the packet queue. For the drop timer, the lock/unlock pair is removed entirely since it only existed to serialize with the timer callback, which hrtimer_cancel() already guarantees. Found by source code audit.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260701Security Bulletin 1 July 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 1 July 2026, published on 1 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53192 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53193 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53201 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53192 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53193 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53201 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53192 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53193 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53201 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53192 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53193 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53201 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-022479LinuxのLinux Kernelにおけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:xfrm: iptfs: iptfs_destroy_state() における ABBA デッドロックの修正iptfs_destroy_state() は、タイマーのコールバックも取得するスピンロックを保持したまま hrtimer_cancel() を呼び出しており、SMP システムにおいて ABBA デッドロックを引き起こします。出力タイマー(iptfs_timer)の場合: - iptfs_destroy_state() は x->lock を保持したまま hrtimer_cancel() を呼び出す - iptfs_delay_timer() コールバックは x->lock を取得するドロップタイマー(drop_timer)の場合: - iptfs_destroy_state() は drop_lock を保持したまま hrtimer_cancel() を呼び出す - iptfs_drop_timer() コールバックは drop_lock を取得する両方のタイマーは HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT を使用しているため、コールバックは softirq コンテキストで実行されます。他の CPU 上で実行中のソフトタイマーに対して hrtimer_cancel() が呼ばれると、hrtimer_cancel_wait_running() は softirq_expiry_lock に対してスピンします。これは、コールバックを実行している softirq が保持しているのと同じロックです。もしコールバックが、hrtimer_cancel() の呼び出し側が保持しているスピンロックの解放待ちでブロックされると、以下のような循環依存が発生します: CPU 0: lock_A を保持 -> softirq_expiry_lock を待機 CPU 1: softirq_expiry_lock を保持 -> lock_A を待機それぞれのロックを取得する前に hrtimer_cancel() を呼び出すことで修正します。hrtimer_cancel() は、いかなるロックも保持せずに呼び出しても安全であり、進行中のコールバックが完了するまで待機します。出力タイマーについては、パケットキューを排出するため、その後にロックを取得します。ドロップタイマーについては、タイマーコールバックとの直列化のためだけに存在していた lock/unlock の組み合わせを完全に削除します。これは hrtimer_cancel() によってすでに保証されます。ソースコード監査により発見されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 4b3faf610cc63bfac972711635eafbca5e7d7117 < a13ca53e47e500854a3b9ec18b5dc83acfec863e, 4b3faf610cc63bfac972711635eafbca5e7d7117 < 822b98d354e63e8249e85473c5f3c519f3c9cecc, 4b3faf610cc63bfac972711635eafbca5e7d7117 < c8a8a75b733467b00c08b91a38dbaf207a08ed6e, 6.14
Fixed
Linux: < 6.14, 6.18.36 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.13 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jun 2026 · Last source change 25 Jun 2026, 08:39 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-39288
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-53197 · cve.blacktree.nl