BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-53143High confidence

drm/amdkfd: Fix buffer overflow in SDMA queue checkpoint/restore on GFX11

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 35 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 20 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.15% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 35 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-53143 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 12 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-53143
105 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Fix buffer overflow in SDMA queue checkpoint/restore on GFX11 The v11 MQD manager incorrectly assigned the CP-compute variants of checkpoint_mqd/restore_mqd for KFD_MQD_TYPE_SDMA queues. These functions use sizeof(struct v11_compute_mqd) (2048 bytes) instead of sizeof(struct v11_sdma_mqd) (512 bytes), causing a 1536-byte overflow. During CRIU checkpoint of an SDMA queue on Navi3x: - checkpoint_mqd() reads 2048 bytes from a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, leaking 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory to userspace During CRIU restore: - restore_mqd() writes 2048 bytes into a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, corrupting 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory (often the ring buffer or neighboring MQDs) This is a copy-paste regression unique to v11. All other ASIC backends (cik, vi, v9, v10, v12) correctly use the SDMA-specific variants. Add checkpoint_mqd_sdma() and restore_mqd_sdma() functions that properly handle the smaller v11_sdma_mqd structure, matching the pattern used in other MQD managers. (cherry picked from commit 6fa41db7ffdec97d62433adf03b7b9b759af8c2c)
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2026-53143 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: drm/amdkfd: Fix buffer overflow in SDMA queue checkpoint/restore on GFX11
70 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • bpftool as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-abi-stablelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-cross-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • kernel-debug-modules-internal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's AMD KFD (Kernel Fusion Driver) component. This buffer overflow vulnerability occurs due to incorrect memory buffer handling during CRIU (Checkpoint/Restore in User-space) operations on SDMA (System Direct Memory Access) queues. A local attacker can exploit this flaw during CRIU restore operations, which can lead to memory corruption in adjacent kernel memory, potentially impacting system stability or leading to further compromise. Additionally, during CRIU checkpoint operations, this vulnerability can result in information disclosure of adjacent kernel memory to userspace.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect. Red Hat recommends treating all kernel errata as security-relevant. Given the kernel's fundamental role, any bug has a higher chance of impacting system security, even if that impact only becomes clear after a fix is published. Therefore, Red Hat prioritizes delivering fixes that improve our customers' overall security posture. Because of this proactive approach, a patch may be associated with a CVE assignment at a future date. Retroactive CVE assignments are always documented in the corresponding errata and on Red Hat's CVE pages. We strongly advise against delaying updates, as doing so may leave your system exposed when protections are already available.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-39234

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Fix buffer overflow in SDMA queue checkpoint/restore on GFX11 The v11 MQD manager incorrectly assigned the CP-compute variants of checkpoint_mqd/restore_mqd for KFD_MQD_TYPE_SDMA queues. These functions use sizeof(struct v11_compute_mqd) (2048 bytes) instead of sizeof(struct v11_sdma_mqd) (512 bytes), causing a 1536-byte overflow. During CRIU checkpoint of an SDMA queue on Navi3x: - checkpoint_mqd() reads 2048 bytes from a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, leaking 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory to userspace During CRIU restore: - restore_mqd() writes 2048 bytes into a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, corrupting 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory (often the ring buffer or neighboring MQDs) This is a copy-paste regression unique to v11. All other ASIC backends (cik, vi, v9, v10, v12) correctly use the SDMA-specific variants. Add checkpoint_mqd_sdma() and restore_mqd_sdma() functions that properly handle the smaller v11_sdma_mqd structure, matching the pattern used in other MQD managers. (cherry picked from commit 6fa41db7ffdec97d62433adf03b7b9b759af8c2c)

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.0 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 35 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Fix buffer overflow in SDMA queue checkpoint/restore on GFX11 The v11 MQD manager incorrectly assigned the CP-compute variants of checkpoint_mqd/restore_mqd for KFD_MQD_TYPE_SDMA queues. These functions use sizeof(struct v11_compute_mqd) (2048 bytes) instead of sizeof(struct v11_sdma_mqd) (512 bytes), causing a 1536-byte overflow. During CRIU checkpoint of an SDMA queue on Navi3x: - checkpoint_mqd() reads 2048 bytes from a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, leaking 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory to userspace During CRIU restore: - restore_mqd() writes 2048 bytes into a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, corrupting 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory (often the ring buffer or neighboring MQDs) This is a copy-paste regression unique to v11. All other ASIC backends (cik, vi, v9, v10, v12) correctly use the SDMA-specific variants. Add checkpoint_mqd_sdma() and restore_mqd_sdma() functions that properly handle the smaller v11_sdma_mqd structure, matching the pattern used in other MQD managers. (cherry picked from commit 6fa41db7ffdec97d62433adf03b7b9b759af8c2c)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Fix buffer overflow in SDMA queue checkpoint/restore on GFX11 The v11 MQD manager incorrectly assigned the CP-compute variants of checkpoint_mqd/restore_mqd for KFD_MQD_TYPE_SDMA queues. These functions use sizeof(struct v11_compute_mqd) (2048 bytes) instead of sizeof(struct v11_sdma_mqd) (512 bytes), causing a 1536-byte overflow. During CRIU checkpoint of an SDMA queue on Navi3x: - checkpoint_mqd() reads 2048 bytes from a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, leaking 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory to userspace During CRIU restore: - restore_mqd() writes 2048 bytes into a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, corrupting 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory (often the ring buffer or neighboring MQDs) This is a copy-paste regression unique to v11. All other ASIC backends (cik, vi, v9, v10, v12) correctly use the SDMA-specific variants. Add checkpoint_mqd_sdma() and restore_mqd_sdma() functions that properly handle the smaller v11_sdma_mqd structure, matching the pattern used in other MQD managers. (cherry picked from commit 6fa41db7ffdec97d62433adf03b7b9b759af8c2c)

Why

The product does not correctly calculate the size to be used when allocating a buffer, which could lead to a buffer overflow.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Fix buffer overflow in SDMA queue checkpoint/restore on GFX11 The v11 MQD manager incorrectly assigned the CP-compute variants of checkpoint_mqd/restore_mqd for KFD_MQD_TYPE_SDMA queues. These functions use sizeof(struct v11_compute_mqd) (2048 bytes) instead of sizeof(struct v11_sdma_mqd) (512 bytes), causing a 1536-byte overflow. During CRIU checkpoint of an SDMA queue on Navi3x: - checkpoint_mqd() reads 2048 bytes from a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, leaking 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory to userspace During CRIU restore: - restore_mqd() writes 2048 bytes into a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, corrupting 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory (often the ring buffer or neighboring MQDs) This is a copy-paste regression unique to v11. All other ASIC backends (cik, vi, v9, v10, v12) correctly use the SDMA-specific variants. Add checkpoint_mqd_sdma() and restore_mqd_sdma() functions that properly handle the smaller v11_sdma_mqd structure, matching the pattern used in other MQD managers. (cherry picked from commit 6fa41db7ffdec97d62433adf03b7b9b759af8c2c)

Why

The product does not correctly calculate the size to be used when allocating a buffer, which could lead to a buffer overflow.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-131 ↗

CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size. The product does not correctly calculate the size to be used when allocating a buffer, which could lead to a buffer overflow.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-131
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-39234Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Fix buffer overflow in SDMA queue checkpoint/restore on GFX11 The v11 MQD manager incorrectly assigned the CP-compute variants of checkpoint_mqd/restore_mqd for KFD_MQD_TYPE_SDMA queues. These functions use sizeof(struct v11_compute_mqd) (2048 bytes) instead of sizeof(struct v11_sdma_mqd) (512 bytes), causing a 1536-byte overflow. During CRIU checkpoint of an SDMA queue on Navi3x: - checkpoint_mqd() reads 2048 bytes from a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, leaking 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory to userspace During CRIU restore: - restore_mqd() writes 2048 bytes into a 512-byte SDMA MQD buffer, corrupting 1536 bytes of adjacent GTT memory (often the ring buffer or neighboring MQDs) This is a copy-paste regression unique to v11. All other ASIC backends (cik, vi, v9, v10, v12) correctly use the SDMA-specific variants. Add checkpoint_mqd_sdma() and restore_mqd_sdma() functions that properly handle the smaller v11_sdma_mqd structure, matching the pattern used in other MQD managers. (cherry picked from commit 6fa41db7ffdec97d62433adf03b7b9b759af8c2c)

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260701Security Bulletin 1 July 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 1 July 2026, published on 1 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0812Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Linux

ulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-52930 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-52931 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-52934 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-52941 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-52942 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-52943 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-52947 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53080 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53133 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53135 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53143 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53146 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53147 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53148 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53149 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53150 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53154 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53158 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53159 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53160 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-53161 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de s

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-023063LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける複数の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。drm/amdkfd: GFX11のSDMAキューのチェックポイントおよびリストアにおけるバッファオーバーフローの修正です。v11のMQDマネージャは、KFD_MQD_TYPE_SDMAキューに対してcheckpoint_mqd／restore_mqdのCPコンピュートバリアントを誤って割り当てていました。これらの関数はsizeof(struct v11_compute_mqd)（2048バイト）を使用していましたが、正しくはsizeof(struct v11_sdma_mqd)（512バイト）であり、そのため1536バイトのオーバーフローが発生していました。Navi3xのSDMAキューのCRIUチェックポイント時には、checkpoint_mqd()が512バイトのSDMA MQDバッファから2048バイトを読み込み、隣接する1536バイトのGTTメモリがユーザースペースに漏洩します。CRIUリストア時には、restore_mqd()が512バイトのSDMA MQDバッファに2048バイトを書き込み、隣接する1536バイトのGTTメモリを破損します（しばしばリングバッファや隣接するMQDに影響を与えます）。これはv11固有のコピペによるリグレッションであり、他のすべてのASICバックエンド（cik、vi、v9、v10、v12）は正しくSDMA専用のバリアントを使用しています。他のMQDマネージャで使用されているパターンに合わせ、小さいv11_sdma_mqd構造体を正しく扱うcheckpoint_mqd_sdma()およびrestore_mqd_sdma()関数を追加しました。（コミット6fa41db7ffdec97d62433adf03b7b9b759af8c2cよりチェリーピックしています。）

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.19, 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.94 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.36 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.13 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jun 2026 · Last source change 20 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC · CWE-131 · Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-39234
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceOther authority
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2026:57251; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2026:57252.
    Before
    patch: git.kernel.org/16dad1fb0d783a4008de30e32d0038c393de05b1 · patch: git.kernel.org/2c5b66c9b4057b385566940935ebc32f6e6ebfd2 · patch: git.kernel.org/352ea59028ea48a6fff77f19ae28f98f71946a80 · 5 more references
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/16dad1fb0d783a4008de30e32d0038c393de05b1 · patch: git.kernel.org/2c5b66c9b4057b385566940935ebc32f6e6ebfd2 · patch: git.kernel.org/352ea59028ea48a6fff77f19ae28f98f71946a80 · 3 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2026:57251; added vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2026:57252.
    Before
    patch: git.kernel.org/16dad1fb0d783a4008de30e32d0038c393de05b1 · patch: git.kernel.org/2c5b66c9b4057b385566940935ebc32f6e6ebfd2 · patch: git.kernel.org/352ea59028ea48a6fff77f19ae28f98f71946a80 · 3 more references
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/16dad1fb0d783a4008de30e32d0038c393de05b1 · patch: git.kernel.org/2c5b66c9b4057b385566940935ebc32f6e6ebfd2 · patch: git.kernel.org/352ea59028ea48a6fff77f19ae28f98f71946a80 · 5 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-39234↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-53143 · cve.blacktree.nl