BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-53125High confidence

md: fix array_state=clear sysfs deadlock

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 24 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.12% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-38993

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: fix array_state=clear sysfs deadlock When "clear" is written to array_state, md_attr_store() breaks sysfs active protection so the array can delete itself from its own sysfs store method. However, md_attr_store() currently drops the mddev reference before calling sysfs_unbreak_active_protection(). Once do_md_stop(..., 0) has made the mddev eligible for delayed deletion, the temporary kobject reference taken by sysfs_break_active_protection() can become the last kobject reference protecting the md kobject. That allows sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() to drop the last kobject reference from the current sysfs writer context. kobject teardown then recurses into kernfs removal while the current sysfs node is still being unwound, and lockdep reports recursive locking on kn->active with kernfs_drain() in the call chain. Reproducer on an existing level: 1. Create an md0 linear array and activate it: mknod /dev/md0 b 9 0 echo none > /sys/block/md0/md/metadata_version echo linear > /sys/block/md0/md/level echo 1 > /sys/block/md0/md/raid_disks echo "$(cat /sys/class/block/sdb/dev)" > /sys/block/md0/md/new_dev echo "$(($(cat /sys/class/block/sdb/size) / 2))" > \ /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdb/size echo 0 > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdb/slot echo active > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state 2. Wait briefly for the array to settle, then clear it: sleep 2 echo clear > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state The warning looks like: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected bash/588 is trying to acquire lock: (kn->active#65) at __kernfs_remove+0x157/0x1d0 but task is already holding lock: (kn->active#65) at sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x1f/0x40 ... Call Trace: kernfs_drain __kernfs_remove kernfs_remove_by_name_ns sysfs_remove_group sysfs_remove_groups __kobject_del kobject_put md_attr_store kernfs_fop_write_iter vfs_write ksys_write Restore active protection before mddev_put() so the extra sysfs kobject reference is dropped while the mddev is still held alive. The actual md kobject deletion is then deferred until after the sysfs write path has fully returned.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: fix array_state=clear sysfs deadlock When "clear" is written to array_state, md_attr_store() breaks sysfs active protection so the array can delete itself from its own sysfs store method. However, md_attr_store() currently drops the mddev reference before calling sysfs_unbreak_active_protection(). Once do_md_stop(..., 0) has made the mddev eligible for delayed deletion, the temporary kobject reference taken by sysfs_break_active_protection() can become the last kobject reference protecting the md kobject. That allows sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() to drop the last kobject reference from the current sysfs writer context. kobject teardown then recurses into kernfs removal while the current sysfs node is still being unwound, and lockdep reports recursive locking on kn->active with kernfs_drain() in the call chain. Reproducer on an existing level: 1. Create an md0 linear array and activate it: mknod /dev/md0 b 9 0 echo none > /sys/block/md0/md/metadata_version echo linear > /sys/block/md0/md/level echo 1 > /sys/block/md0/md/raid_disks echo "$(cat /sys/class/block/sdb/dev)" > /sys/block/md0/md/new_dev echo "$(($(cat /sys/class/block/sdb/size) / 2))" > \ /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdb/size echo 0 > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdb/slot echo active > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state 2. Wait briefly for the array to settle, then clear it: sleep 2 echo clear > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state The warning looks like: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected bash/588 is trying to acquire lock: (kn->active#65) at __kernfs_remove+0x157/0x1d0 but task is already holding lock: (kn->active#65) at sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x1f/0x40 ... Call Trace: kernfs_drain __kernfs_remove kernfs_remove_by_name_ns sysfs_remove_group sysfs_remove_groups __kobject_del kobject_put md_attr_store kernfs_fop_write_iter vfs_write ksys_write Restore active protection before mddev_put() so the extra sysfs kobject reference is dropped while the mddev is still held alive. The actual md kobject deletion is then deferred until after the sysfs write path has fully returned.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: fix array_state=clear sysfs deadlock When "clear" is written to array_state, md_attr_store() breaks sysfs active protection so the array can delete itself from its own sysfs store method. However, md_attr_store() currently drops the mddev reference before calling sysfs_unbreak_active_protection(). Once do_md_stop(..., 0) has made the mddev eligible for delayed deletion, the temporary kobject reference taken by sysfs_break_active_protection() can become the last kobject reference protecting the md kobject. That allows sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() to drop the last kobject reference from the current sysfs writer context. kobject teardown then recurses into kernfs removal while the current sysfs node is still being unwound, and lockdep reports recursive locking on kn->active with kernfs_drain() in the call chain. Reproducer on an existing level: 1. Create an md0 linear array and activate it: mknod /dev/md0 b 9 0 echo none > /sys/block/md0/md/metadata_version echo linear > /sys/block/md0/md/level echo 1 > /sys/block/md0/md/raid_disks echo "$(cat /sys/class/block/sdb/dev)" > /sys/block/md0/md/new_dev echo "$(($(cat /sys/class/block/sdb/size) / 2))" > \ /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdb/size echo 0 > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdb/slot echo active > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state 2. Wait briefly for the array to settle, then clear it: sleep 2 echo clear > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state The warning looks like: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected bash/588 is trying to acquire lock: (kn->active#65) at __kernfs_remove+0x157/0x1d0 but task is already holding lock: (kn->active#65) at sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x1f/0x40 ... Call Trace: kernfs_drain __kernfs_remove kernfs_remove_by_name_ns sysfs_remove_group sysfs_remove_groups __kobject_del kobject_put md_attr_store kernfs_fop_write_iter vfs_write ksys_write Restore active protection before mddev_put() so the extra sysfs kobject reference is dropped while the mddev is still held alive. The actual md kobject deletion is then deferred until after the sysfs write path has fully returned.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260701Security Bulletin 1 July 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 1 July 2026, published on 1 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-024999LinuxのLinux Kernelにおけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました: md: array_state="clear" の sysfs デッドロック修正。"clear" が array_state に書き込まれた際、md_attr_store() は sysfs のアクティブ保護を破り、配列自身が自身の sysfs ストアメソッドから削除できるようになります。しかしながら、md_attr_store() は現状、sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() を呼び出す前に mddev の参照を解放してしまいます。do_md_stop(..., 0) が mddev を遅延削除対象にした時点で、sysfs_break_active_protection() が一時的に取得した kobject の参照が、md kobject を保護する最後の kobject 参照になる可能性があります。これにより、sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() は現在の sysfs 書き込みコンテキストから最後の kobject 参照を解放してしまいます。kobject の破棄処理は、現在の sysfs ノードのアンワインド中に kernfs 削除を再帰的に呼び出し、lockdep によって kn->active に対する再帰的ロックが kernfs_drain() の呼び出しチェーン内で検出されます。既存のレベルでの再現手順:1. md0 のリニアアレイを作成して起動: mknod /dev/md0 b 9 0 echo none > /sys/block/md0/md/metadata_version echo linear > /sys/block/md0/md/level echo 1 > /sys/block/md0/md/raid_disks echo "$(cat /sys/class/block/sdb/dev)" > /sys/block/md0/md/new_dev echo "$(($(cat /sys/class/block/sdb/size) / 2))" > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdb/size echo 0 > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdb/slot echo active > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state2. アレイが落ち着くまで少し待ち、次にクリア: sleep 2 echo clear > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state警告例:WARNING: possible recursive locking detectedbash/588 is trying to acquire lock:(kn->active#65) at __kernfs_remove+0x157/0x1d0but task is already holding lock:(kn->active#65) at sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x1f/0x40...Call Trace:kernfs_drain__kernfs_removekernfs_remove_by_name_nssysfs_remove_groupsysfs_remove_groups__kobject_delkobject_putmd_attr_storekernfs_fop_write_itervfs_writeksys_writemddev_put() の前にアクティブ保護を復元することで、mddev がまだ生存している間に余分な sysfs kobject 参照を解放することができます。実際の md kobject の削除は、sysfs 書き込みパスが完全に終了した後に延期されます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 9e59d609763f70a992a8f3808dabcce60f14eb5c < 62c44566da7493ee48ef17e8507bb798338a07cb, 9e59d609763f70a992a8f3808dabcce60f14eb5c < 92ad0ec509ffb188d8f849b63148664df37b4a52, 9e59d609763f70a992a8f3808dabcce60f14eb5c < 2aa72276fab9851dbd59c2daeb4b590c5a113908, 6.17
Fixed
Linux: < 6.17, 6.18.33 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.10 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Jun 2026 · Last source change 24 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38993
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-53125 · cve.blacktree.nl