Full vulnerability report · 2026

CVE-2026-53109High confidence

powerpc/pgtable-frag: Fix bad page state in pte_frag_destroy

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1

Recommended action

Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product

Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →

Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 24 Jun 2026

Evidence used

No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Debian Security Tracker, Canonical Ubuntu Security: 21 affected package states with no published fix

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states

Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution release	Source package	Vendor state	Fixed version	Evidence
Debian trixietrixie · source	`linux`	Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.	`Not published in this feed`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · source	`linux`	Not affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).	`Not published in this feed`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`7.0.10-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`7.0.10-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-aws`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-fde`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gcp`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gke`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gkeop`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-ibm`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-tegra`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oem-6.11`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oracle`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-riscv`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-xilinx`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current

CVE-2026-53109 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 5 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-53109

2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build
SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms

Summary: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/pgtable-frag: Fix bad page state in pte_frag_destroy powerpc uses pt_frag_refcount as a reference counter for tracking it's pte and pmd page table fragments. For PTE table, in case of Hash with 64K pagesize, we have 16 fragments of 4K size in one 64K page. Patch series [1] "mm: free retracted page table by RCU" added pte_free_defer() to defer the freeing of PTE tables when retract_page_tables() is called for madvise MADV_COLLAPSE on shmem range. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7cd843a9-aa80-14f-5eb2-33427363c20@google.com/ pte_free_defer() sets the active flag on the corresponding fragment's folio & calls pte_fragment_free(), which reduces the pt_frag_refcount. When pt_frag_refcount reaches 0 (no active fragment using the folio), it checks if the folio active flag is set, if set, it calls call_rcu to free the folio, it the active flag is unset then it calls pte_free_now(). Now, this can lead to following problem in a corner case... [ 265.351553][ T183] BUG: Bad page state in process a.out pfn:20d62 [ 265.353555][ T183] page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x20d62 [ 265.355457][ T183] flags: 0x3ffff800000100(active|node=0|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x7ffff) [ 265.358719][ T183] raw: 003ffff800000100 0000000000000000 5deadbeef0000122 0000000000000000 [ 265.360177][ T183] raw: 0000000000000000 c0000000119caf58 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 265.361438][ T183] page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set [ 265.362572][ T183] Modules linked in: [ 265.364622][ T183] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 183 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.18.0-rc3-00141-g1ddeaaace7ff-dirty #53 VOLUNTARY [ 265.364785][ T183] Hardware name: IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) POWER10 (architected) 0x801200 0xf000006 of:SLOF,git-ee03ae pSeries [ 265.364908][ T183] Call Trace: [ 265.364955][ T183] [c000000011e6f7c0] [c000000001cfaa18] dump_stack_lvl+0x130/0x148 (unreliable) [ 265.365202][ T183] [c000000011e6f7f0] [c000000000794758] bad_page+0xb4/0x1c8 [ 265.365384][ T183] [c000000011e6f890] [c00000000079c020] __free_frozen_pages+0x838/0xd08 [ 265.365554][ T183] [c000000011e6f980] [c0000000000a70ac] pte_frag_destroy+0x298/0x310 [ 265.365729][ T183] [c000000011e6fa30] [c0000000000aa764] arch_exit_mmap+0x34/0x218 [ 265.365912][ T183] [c000000011e6fa80] [c000000000751698] exit_mmap+0xb8/0x820 [ 265.366080][ T183] [c000000011e6fc30] [c0000000001b1258] __mmput+0x98/0x300 [ 265.366244][ T183] [c000000011e6fc80] [c0000000001c81f8] do_exit+0x470/0x1508 [ 265.366421][ T183] [c000000011e6fd70] [c0000000001c95e4] do_group_exit+0x88/0x148 [ 265.366602][ T183] [c000000011e6fdc0] [c0000000001c96ec] pid_child_should_wake+0x0/0x178 [ 265.366780][ T183] [c000000011e6fdf0] [c00000000003a270] system_call_exception+0x1b0/0x4e0 [ 265.366958][ T183] [c000000011e6fe50] [c00000000000d05c] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec The bad page state error occurs when such a folio gets freed (with active flag set), from do_exit() path in parallel. ... this can happen when the pte fragment was allocated from this folio, but when all the fragments get freed, the pte_frag_refcount still had some unused fragments. Now, if this process exits, with such folio as it's cached pte_frag in mm->context, then during pte_frag_destroy(), we simply call pagetable_dtor() and pagetable_free(), meaning it doesn't clear the active flag. This, can lead to the above bug. Since we are anyway in do_exit() path, then if the refcount is 0, then I guess it should be ok to simply clear the folio active flag before calling pagetable_dtor() & pagetable_free().
Remediation: To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Fix availability varies by product

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/pgtable-frag: Fix bad page state in pte_frag_destroy powerpc uses pt_frag_refcount as a reference counter for tracking it's pte and pmd page table fragments. For PTE table, in case of Hash with 64K pagesize, we have 16 fragments of 4K size in one 64K page. Patch series [1] "mm: free retracted page table by RCU" added pte_free_defer() to defer the freeing of PTE tables when retract_page_tables() is called for madvise MADV_COLLAPSE on shmem range. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7cd843a9-aa80-14f-5eb2-33427363c20@google.com/ pte_free_defer() sets the active flag on the corresponding fragment's folio & calls pte_fragment_free(), which reduces the pt_frag_refcount. When pt_frag_refcount reaches 0 (no active fragment using the folio), it checks if the folio active flag is set, if set, it calls call_rcu to free the folio, it the active flag is unset then it calls pte_free_now(). Now, this can lead to following problem in a corner case... [ 265.351553][ T183] BUG: Bad page state in process a.out pfn:20d62 [ 265.353555][ T183] page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x20d62 [ 265.355457][ T183] flags: 0x3ffff800000100(active|node=0|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x7ffff) [ 265.358719][ T183] raw: 003ffff800000100 0000000000000000 5deadbeef0000122 0000000000000000 [ 265.360177][ T183] raw: 0000000000000000 c0000000119caf58 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 265.361438][ T183] page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set [ 265.362572][ T183] Modules linked in: [ 265.364622][ T183] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 183 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.18.0-rc3-00141-g1ddeaaace7ff-dirty #53 VOLUNTARY [ 265.364785][ T183] Hardware name: IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) POWER10 (architected) 0x801200 0xf000006 of:SLOF,git-ee03ae pSeries [ 265.364908][ T183] Call Trace: [ 265.364955][ T183] [c000000011e6f7c0] [c000000001cfaa18] dump_stack_lvl+0x130/0x148 (unreliable) [ 265.365202][ T183] [c000000011e6f7f0] [c000000000794758] bad_page+0xb4/0x1c8 [ 265.365384][ T183] [c000000011e6f890] [c00000000079c020] __free_frozen_pages+0x838/0xd08 [ 265.365554][ T183] [c000000011e6f980] [c0000000000a70ac] pte_frag_destroy+0x298/0x310 [ 265.365729][ T183] [c000000011e6fa30] [c0000000000aa764] arch_exit_mmap+0x34/0x218 [ 265.365912][ T183] [c000000011e6fa80] [c000000000751698] exit_mmap+0xb8/0x820 [ 265.366080][ T183] [c000000011e6fc30] [c0000000001b1258] __mmput+0x98/0x300 [ 265.366244][ T183] [c000000011e6fc80] [c0000000001c81f8] do_exit+0x470/0x1508 [ 265.366421][ T183] [c000000011e6fd70] [c0000000001c95e4] do_group_exit+0x88/0x148 [ 265.366602][ T183] [c000000011e6fdc0] [c0000000001c96ec] pid_child_should_wake+0x0/0x178 [ 265.366780][ T183] [c000000011e6fdf0] [c00000000003a270] system_call_exception+0x1b0/0x4e0 [ 265.366958][ T183] [c000000011e6fe50] [c00000000000d05c] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec The bad page state error occurs when such a folio gets freed (with active flag set), from do_exit() path in parallel. ... this can happen when the pte fragment was allocated from this folio, but when all the fragments get freed, the pte_frag_refcount still had some unused fragments. Now, if this process exits, with such folio as it's cached pte_frag in mm->context, then during pte_frag_destroy(), we simply call pagetable_dtor() and pagetable_free(), meaning it doesn't clear the active flag. This, can lead to the above bug. Since we are anyway in do_exit() path, then if the refcount is 0, then I guess it should be ok to simply clear the folio active flag before calling pagetable_dtor() & pagetable_free().

What

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path: local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface: Local
Privileges required: Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction: None
Attack complexity: Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary: Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ? CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.: CWE-416 ↗
CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.
CVSS vector ? CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land: The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.

CWE-416

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38977Official EUVD mapping

0 linked advisory records.

Official EUVD record ↗

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260701Security Bulletin 1 July 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 1 July 2026, published on 1 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-025015LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。powerpc/pgtable-frag：pte_frag_destroyにおける不正なページ状態の修正。powerpcは、pt_frag_refcountを参照カウンタとして使用し、pteおよびpmdのページテーブル断片を追跡しています。PTEテーブルでは、64Kページサイズのハッシュ方式の場合、1つの64Kページに4Kサイズの断片が16個存在します。パッチシリーズ[1]「mm: free retracted page table by RCU」では、shmemレンジのmadvise MADV_COLLAPSE呼び出しでretract_page_tables()が実行された際に、PTEテーブルの解放を遅延させるためのpte_free_defer()が追加されました。[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7cd843a9-aa80-14f-5eb2-33427363c20@google.com/ pte_free_defer()は該当する断片のfolioにactiveフラグをセットし、pte_fragment_free()を呼び出してpt_frag_refcountを減らします。pt_frag_refcountが0になると（folioを使用しているアクティブな断片がない場合）、folioのactiveフラグがセットされているかを確認し、セットされていればcall_rcuを呼んでfolioを解放し、セットされていなければpte_free_now()を呼び出します。しかし、これにより以下のようなコーナーケースの問題が発生する可能性があります。[ 265.351553][ T183] BUG: Bad page state in process a.out pfn:20d62[ 265.353555][ T183] page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x20d62...（省略）この不正なページ状態エラーは、activeフラグがセットされたままfolioが並行してdo_exit()パスから解放されると発生します。この状況は、pte断片がこのfolioから割り当てられ、すべての断片が解放されたにもかかわらず、pt_frag_refcountに未使用の断片が残っている場合に発生します。このプロセスが終了すると、このfolioがmm-＞contextのキャッシュされたpte_fragとして存在する状態になります。pte_frag_destroy()内で単純にpagetable_dtor()とpagetable_free()を呼び出しますが、activeフラグはクリアされません。これが上述のバグの原因となる動作です。do_exit()パスにいる場合、参照カウントが0であれば、pagetable_dtor()とpagetable_free()を呼び出す前にfolioのactiveフラグを単純にクリアしても問題はありません。

Official advisory ↗

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status ? Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.: Fix availability varies by product
Affected: SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build
SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms
Fixed: Linux: < 6.6, 6.18.33 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.10 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action: Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround: No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Jun 2026 · Last source change 24 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2

CVSS sourceNIST NVD

EPSS source

The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.

FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14

European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38977

Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team

Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team

CWE sourceNIST NVD

NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

3 Oct 2026, 00:53 UTC
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
Fixed: kernel-64kb-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-64kb-devel-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-64kb-extra-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-azure-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-azure-devel-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-azure-extra-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-azure-vdso-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-default-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-default-base-6.12.0-160000.38.1.160000.2.24 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-default-devel-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-default-extra-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-default-livepatch-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-default-vdso-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-devel-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-docs-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-docs-html-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-kvmsmall-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-kvmsmall-devel-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-kvmsmall-vdso-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-macros-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-obs-qa-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-source-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-source-vanilla-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-syms-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; kernel-zfcpdump-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0; cluster-md-kmp-default-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0; dlm-kmp-default-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0; gfs2-kmp-default-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0; kernel-64kb-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0; kernel-64kb-devel-6.12.0-160000.38.1 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0; and 38 more
After
SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build; SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms
SUSE Product Security Team ↗

2026-06-24CVE published

2026-06-24Fixed release or patch reference recorded

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38977↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗

Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report

CVE: Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS: Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS: Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE: Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA: CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD: National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT: A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC: Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF: Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL: Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.

powerpc/pgtable-frag: Fix bad page state in pte_frag_destroy

Published severity in operational context

Evidence used

Compensating controls

Verification

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Release-specific package status

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

National CERT insights
?
CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

EUVD-2026-38977

What, why and how

Exploit reality and attack path

Official authority intelligence

Patch and workaround

Evidence and provenance

What changed after publication