BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-53070High confidence

sctp: disable BH before calling udp_tunnel_xmit_skb()

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.63% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.95-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-53070 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 8 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-53070
136 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: disable BH before calling udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() / udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb() are expected to run with BH disabled. After commit 6f1a9140ecda ("add xmit recursion limit to tunnel xmit functions"), on the path: udp(6)_tunnel_xmit_skb() -> ip(6)tunnel_xmit() dev_xmit_recursion_inc()/dec() must stay balanced on the same CPU. Without local_bh_disable(), the context may move between CPUs, which can break the inc/dec pairing. This may lead to incorrect recursion level detection and cause packets to be dropped in ip(6)_tunnel_xmit() or __dev_queue_xmit(). Fix it by disabling BH around both IPv4 and IPv6 SCTP UDP xmit paths. In my testing, after enabling the SCTP over UDP: # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec ha iperf3 -s - without this patch: # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.2 MBytes 31.2 Mbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.1 MBytes 31.1 Mbits/sec receiver - with this patch: # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec receiver
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-38938

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: disable BH before calling udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() / udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb() are expected to run with BH disabled. After commit 6f1a9140ecda ("add xmit recursion limit to tunnel xmit functions"), on the path: udp(6)_tunnel_xmit_skb() -> ip(6)tunnel_xmit() dev_xmit_recursion_inc()/dec() must stay balanced on the same CPU. Without local_bh_disable(), the context may move between CPUs, which can break the inc/dec pairing. This may lead to incorrect recursion level detection and cause packets to be dropped in ip(6)_tunnel_xmit() or __dev_queue_xmit(). Fix it by disabling BH around both IPv4 and IPv6 SCTP UDP xmit paths. In my testing, after enabling the SCTP over UDP: # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec ha iperf3 -s - without this patch: # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.2 MBytes 31.2 Mbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.1 MBytes 31.1 Mbits/sec receiver - with this patch: # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec receiver

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: disable BH before calling udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() / udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb() are expected to run with BH disabled. After commit 6f1a9140ecda ("add xmit recursion limit to tunnel xmit functions"), on the path: udp(6)_tunnel_xmit_skb() -> ip(6)tunnel_xmit() dev_xmit_recursion_inc()/dec() must stay balanced on the same CPU. Without local_bh_disable(), the context may move between CPUs, which can break the inc/dec pairing. This may lead to incorrect recursion level detection and cause packets to be dropped in ip(6)_tunnel_xmit() or __dev_queue_xmit(). Fix it by disabling BH around both IPv4 and IPv6 SCTP UDP xmit paths. In my testing, after enabling the SCTP over UDP: # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec ha iperf3 -s - without this patch: # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.2 MBytes 31.2 Mbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.1 MBytes 31.1 Mbits/sec receiver - with this patch: # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec receiver

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: disable BH before calling udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() / udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb() are expected to run with BH disabled. After commit 6f1a9140ecda ("add xmit recursion limit to tunnel xmit functions"), on the path: udp(6)_tunnel_xmit_skb() -> ip(6)tunnel_xmit() dev_xmit_recursion_inc()/dec() must stay balanced on the same CPU. Without local_bh_disable(), the context may move between CPUs, which can break the inc/dec pairing. This may lead to incorrect recursion level detection and cause packets to be dropped in ip(6)_tunnel_xmit() or __dev_queue_xmit(). Fix it by disabling BH around both IPv4 and IPv6 SCTP UDP xmit paths. In my testing, after enabling the SCTP over UDP: # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec ha iperf3 -s - without this patch: # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.2 MBytes 31.2 Mbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.1 MBytes 31.1 Mbits/sec receiver - with this patch: # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec receiver

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260701Security Bulletin 1 July 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 1 July 2026, published on 1 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53002 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-53060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-024713LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。sctp: udp_tunnel_xmit_skb()を呼び出す前にBHを無効化する必要があります。udp_tunnel_xmit_skb()およびudp_tunnel6_xmit_skb()は、BHが無効化された状態で動作することが期待されています。コミット6f1a9140ecda（"トンネル送信関数にxmit再帰制限を追加"）以降、以下の経路で動作します：udp(6)_tunnel_xmit_skb() -＞ ip(6)_tunnel_xmit()。dev_xmit_recursion_inc()/dec()は同じCPU上でバランスを保つ必要があります。local_bh_disable()がない場合、コンテキストがCPU間で移動する可能性があり、inc/decの対応が崩れます。これにより再帰レベルの検出に誤りが生じ、ip(6)_tunnel_xmit()や__dev_queue_xmit()においてパケットが破棄される可能性があります。IPv4およびIPv6のSCTP UDP送信経路周辺でBHを無効化することでこの問題を修正しています。私のテストでは、SCTP over UDPを有効化した後に以下のコマンドを実行しました： # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec ha sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.udp_port=9899 # ip net exec hb sysctl -w net.sctp.encap_port=9899 # ip net exec ha iperf3 -sパッチ適用前： # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.2 MBytes 31.2 Mbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.1 MBytes 31.1 Mbits/sec receiverパッチ適用後： # ip net exec hb iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 --sctp [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.14 GBytes 2.69 Gbits/sec receiver以上の内容で修正および表現を自然に整えました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.11, 6.12.95 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.37 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.10 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Jun 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38938
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38938↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-53070 · cve.blacktree.nl