BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-53035High confidence

bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 24 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-53035 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 17 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-53035
105 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning at sock_map_update_elem()'s bh_lock_sock(): WARNING: possible recursive locking detected test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 but task is already holding lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_UNIX); lock(slock-AF_UNIX); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by test_progs/1393: #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 vfs_read+0x171/0xb20 ksys_read+0xff/0x200 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-38903

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning at sock_map_update_elem()'s bh_lock_sock(): WARNING: possible recursive locking detected test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 but task is already holding lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_UNIX); lock(slock-AF_UNIX); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by test_progs/1393: #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 vfs_read+0x171/0xb20 ksys_read+0xff/0x200 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning at sock_map_update_elem()'s bh_lock_sock(): WARNING: possible recursive locking detected test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 but task is already holding lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_UNIX); lock(slock-AF_UNIX); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by test_progs/1393: #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 vfs_read+0x171/0xb20 ksys_read+0xff/0x200 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning at sock_map_update_elem()'s bh_lock_sock(): WARNING: possible recursive locking detected test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 but task is already holding lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_UNIX); lock(slock-AF_UNIX); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by test_progs/1393: #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 vfs_read+0x171/0xb20 ksys_read+0xff/0x200 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260701Security Bulletin 1 July 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 1 July 2026, published on 1 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-53006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53012 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53022 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-52957 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52961 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52962 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52975 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52980 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-52995 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53003 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53022 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0866Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Linux

u 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53011 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53012 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53013 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53021 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53022 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53023 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53032 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53034 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53035 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53036 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53037 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53047 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53050 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53056 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53058 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53059 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53060 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linu

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-53006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53012 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53022 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-023979LinuxのLinux Kernelにおけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました：bpf、sockmapに関するaf_unixイテレータのデッドロックの修正です。bpf_iter_unix_seq_show()では、lock_sock_fast()が高速パスを取った場合に、イテレータプログラムがsockmapの更新を試みるとデッドロックを引き起こす可能性があります。これは最終的にsock_map_update_elem()のbh_lock_sock()でスピン状態になることを意味します。具体的には、以下の警告が表示されます：WARNING: 可能な再帰的ロック検出 test_progs/1393が以下のロックを取得しようとしています： ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}、場所: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 しかし、このタスクは既にロックを保持しています： ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}、場所: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0デバッグの参考となるその他の情報は以下の通りです。安全でないロック状況の可能性： CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_UNIX); lock(slock-AF_UNIX); *** デッドロックです ***この問題はロックの入れ子表記が不足していることが原因である可能性があります。test_progs/1393が保持している4つのロックは以下の通りです： #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&p-＞lock){+.+.}-{4:4}、場所: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}、場所: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}、場所: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}、場所: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00コールトレースは以下の通りです： dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 vfs_read+0x171/0xb20 ksys_read+0xff/0x200 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.141 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.91 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.33 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.10 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Jun 2026 · Last source change 24 Jun 2026, 16:29 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38903
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38903↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-53035 · cve.blacktree.nl