Full vulnerability report · 2026

CVE-2026-53034High confidence

bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix null-ptr-deref in proto update

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1

Recommended action

Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product

Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →

Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 24 Jun 2026

Evidence used

No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Canonical Ubuntu Security: 20 affected package states with no published fix

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states

Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution release	Source package	Vendor state	Fixed version	Evidence
Debian trixietrixie · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`6.12.94-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`6.1.176-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`7.0.10-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`7.0.10-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-aws`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-fde`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gcp`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gke`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gkeop`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-ibm`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-tegra`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oem-6.11`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oracle`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-riscv`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-xilinx`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current

CVE-2026-53034 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-53034

163 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS

Summary: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix null-ptr-deref in proto update unix_stream_connect() sets sk_state (`WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED)`) _before_ it assigns a peer (`unix_peer(sk) = newsk`). sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED makes sock_map_sk_state_allowed() believe that socket is properly set up, which would include having a defined peer. IOW, there's a window when unix_stream_bpf_update_proto() can be called on socket which still has unix_peer(sk) == NULL. CPU0 bpf CPU1 connect -------- ------------ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED) sock_map_sk_state_allowed(sk) ... sk_pair = unix_peer(sk) sock_hold(sk_pair) sock_hold(newsk) smp_mb__after_atomic() unix_peer(sk) = newsk BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000080 RIP: 0010:unix_stream_bpf_update_proto+0xa0/0x1b0 Call Trace: sock_map_link+0x564/0x8b0 sock_map_update_common+0x6e/0x340 sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x17d/0x240 __sys_bpf+0x26db/0x3250 __x64_sys_bpf+0x21/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Initial idea was to move peer assignment _before_ the sk_state update[1], but that involved an additional memory barrier, and changing the hot path was rejected. Then a NULL check during proto update in unix_stream_bpf_update_proto() was considered[2], but the follow-up discussion[3] focused on the root cause, i.e. sockmap update taking a wrong lock. Or, more specifically, missing unix_state_lock()[4]. In the end it was concluded that teaching sockmap about the af_unix locking would be unnecessarily complex[5]. Complexity aside, since BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS and BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT are allowed to update sockmaps, sock_map_update_elem() taking the unix lock, as it is currently implemented in unix_state_lock(): spin_lock(&unix_sk(s)->lock), would be problematic. unix_state_lock() taken in a process context, followed by a softirq-context TC BPF program attempting to take the same spinlock -- deadlock[6]. This way we circled back to the peer check idea[2]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ba5c50aa-1df4-40c2-ab33-a72022c5a32e@rbox.co/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240610174906.32921-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/7603c0e6-cd5b-452b-b710-73b64bd9de26@linux.dev/ [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAAVpQUA+8GL_j63CaKb8hbxoL21izD58yr1NvhOhU=j+35+3og@mail.gmail.com/ [5]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAAVpQUAHijOMext28Gi10dSLuMzGYh+jK61Ujn+fZ-wvcODR2A@mail.gmail.com/ [6]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/dd043c69-4d03-46fe-8325-8f97101435cf@linux.dev/ Summary of scenarios where af_unix/stream connect() may race a sockmap update: 1. connect() vs. bpf(BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM), i.e. sock_map_update_elem_sys() Implemented NULL check is sufficient. Once assigned, socket peer won't be released until socket fd is released. And that's not an issue because sock_map_update_elem_sys() bumps fd refcnf. 2. connect() vs BPF program doing update Update restricted per verifier.c:may_update_sockmap() to BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING/BPF_TRACE_ITER BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS (bpf_sock_map_update() only) BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP Plus one more race to consider: CPU0 bpf CPU1 connect -------- ------------ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED) sock_map_sk_state_allowed(sk) sock_hold(newsk) smp_mb__after_atomic() ---truncated---
Remediation: To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Fix availability varies by product

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix null-ptr-deref in proto update unix_stream_connect() sets sk_state (`WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED)`) _before_ it assigns a peer (`unix_peer(sk) = newsk`). sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED makes sock_map_sk_state_allowed() believe that socket is properly set up, which would include having a defined peer. IOW, there's a window when unix_stream_bpf_update_proto() can be called on socket which still has unix_peer(sk) == NULL. CPU0 bpf CPU1 connect -------- ------------ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED) sock_map_sk_state_allowed(sk) ... sk_pair = unix_peer(sk) sock_hold(sk_pair) sock_hold(newsk) smp_mb__after_atomic() unix_peer(sk) = newsk BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000080 RIP: 0010:unix_stream_bpf_update_proto+0xa0/0x1b0 Call Trace: sock_map_link+0x564/0x8b0 sock_map_update_common+0x6e/0x340 sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x17d/0x240 __sys_bpf+0x26db/0x3250 __x64_sys_bpf+0x21/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Initial idea was to move peer assignment _before_ the sk_state update[1], but that involved an additional memory barrier, and changing the hot path was rejected. Then a NULL check during proto update in unix_stream_bpf_update_proto() was considered[2], but the follow-up discussion[3] focused on the root cause, i.e. sockmap update taking a wrong lock. Or, more specifically, missing unix_state_lock()[4]. In the end it was concluded that teaching sockmap about the af_unix locking would be unnecessarily complex[5]. Complexity aside, since BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS and BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT are allowed to update sockmaps, sock_map_update_elem() taking the unix lock, as it is currently implemented in unix_state_lock(): spin_lock(&unix_sk(s)->lock), would be problematic. unix_state_lock() taken in a process context, followed by a softirq-context TC BPF program attempting to take the same spinlock -- deadlock[6]. This way we circled back to the peer check idea[2]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ba5c50aa-1df4-40c2-ab33-a72022c5a32e@rbox.co/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240610174906.32921-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/7603c0e6-cd5b-452b-b710-73b64bd9de26@linux.dev/ [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAAVpQUA+8GL_j63CaKb8hbxoL21izD58yr1NvhOhU=j+35+3og@mail.gmail.com/ [5]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAAVpQUAHijOMext28Gi10dSLuMzGYh+jK61Ujn+fZ-wvcODR2A@mail.gmail.com/ [6]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/dd043c69-4d03-46fe-8325-8f97101435cf@linux.dev/ Summary of scenarios where af_unix/stream connect() may race a sockmap update: 1. connect() vs. bpf(BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM), i.e. sock_map_update_elem_sys() Implemented NULL check is sufficient. Once assigned, socket peer won't be released until socket fd is released. And that's not an issue because sock_map_update_elem_sys() bumps fd refcnf. 2. connect() vs BPF program doing update Update restricted per verifier.c:may_update_sockmap() to BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING/BPF_TRACE_ITER BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS (bpf_sock_map_update() only) BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP Plus one more race to consider: CPU0 bpf CPU1 connect -------- ------------ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED) sock_map_sk_state_allowed(sk) sock_hold(newsk) smp_mb__after_atomic() ---truncated---

What

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path: local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface: Local
Privileges required: Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction: None
Attack complexity: Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary: Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ? CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.: CWE-476 ↗
CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.
CVSS vector ? CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land: The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.

CWE-476

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38902Official EUVD mapping

0 linked advisory records.

Official EUVD record ↗

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260701Security Bulletin 1 July 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 1 July 2026, published on 1 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-53025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-52939 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52946 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-52955 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52956 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52972 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52975 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-52946 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52956 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52972 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52975 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0866Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Linux

u 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53006 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53011 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53012 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53013 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53021 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53022 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53023 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53032 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53034 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53035 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53036 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53037 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53047 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53050 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53056 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53058 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linux CVE-2026-53059 du 27 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Azure Linu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-53004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53012 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53022 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-023980LinuxのLinux KernelにおけるNULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。bpf、sockmap：proto更新時のaf_unixにおけるNULLポインタ参照の修正。unix_stream_connect()は、ピアを割り当てる前にsk_stateを（WRITE_ONCE(sk-＞sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED)に）設定します（unix_peer(sk) = newsk）。sk_stateがTCP_ESTABLISHEDであることで、sock_map_sk_state_allowed()はソケットが正しく設定されていると判断します。これはピアが定義されていることも含みます。つまり、unix_stream_bpf_update_proto()がまだunix_peer(sk)がNULLであるソケットに対して呼び出される可能性がある時間帯（ウィンドウ）が存在していました。 CPU0 bpf CPU1 connect-------- ------------WRITE_ONCE(sk-＞sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED)sock_map_sk_state_allowed(sk)...sk_pair = unix_peer(sk)sock_hold(sk_pair) sock_hold(newsk) smp_mb__after_atomic() unix_peer(sk) = newskBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000080RIP: 0010:unix_stream_bpf_update_proto+0xa0/0x1b0Call Trace: sock_map_link+0x564/0x8b0 sock_map_update_common+0x6e/0x340 sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x17d/0x240 __sys_bpf+0x26db/0x3250 __x64_sys_bpf+0x21/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e当初の案は、ピアの割り当てをsk_stateの更新前に移動することでしたが、これは追加のメモリバリアを伴いホットパスの変更となるため却下されました。その後、unix_stream_bpf_update_proto()内のproto更新時にNULLチェックを入れる案が検討されました。しかし、続く議論では根本原因、すなわちsockmapの更新に不適切なロックが使用されている問題に焦点が当てられました。具体的にはunix_state_lock()の欠如が問題でした。最終的に、sockmapにaf_unixのロック機構を導入することは不必要に複雑になると結論付けられました。複雑さはさておき、BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLSおよびBPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACTがsockmapの更新を許可されているため、sock_map_update_elem()が現在unix_state_lock()で行われているようにspin_lock(&unix_sk(s)-＞lock)によるunixロックを取得すると問題が生じます。具体的には、プロセスコンテキストでunix_state_lock()を取得し、その後softirqコンテキストのTC BPFプログラムが同じスピンロックを取得しようとするとデッドロックが発生します。このため、再びピアチェック案に戻りました。af_unix/stream connect()がsockmapの更新とレースコンディションになるシナリオをまとめます。1. connect()対bpf(BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM)、つまりsock_map_update_elem_sys()については、実装されているNULLチェックが十分です。一度割り当てられたソケットのピアは、ソケットFDが解放されるまで解放されません。また、sock_map_update_elem_sys()はFDの参照カウントを上げるため、問題にはなりません。2. connect()対BPFプログラムによる更新については、verifier.cのmay_update_sockmap()により更新は以下のプログラムタイプに制限されています。 - BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING/BPF_TRACE_ITER - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS (bpf_sock_map_update()のみ) - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT - BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT - BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUPさらに考慮すべきもう一つのレースがあります。 CPU0 bpf CPU1 connect -------- ------------WRITE_ONCE(sk-＞sk_state, TCP_ESTABLISHED)sock_map_sk_state_allowed(sk)sock_hold(newsk)smp_mb__after_atomic()---省略---

Official advisory ↗

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status ? Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.: Fix availability varies by product
Affected: kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
and 133 more
Fixed: Linux: < 5.15, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.141 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.91 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.33 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.10 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action: Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround: No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Jun 2026 · Last source change 24 Jun 2026, 16:29 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2

CVSS sourceNIST NVD

EPSS source

The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.

FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14

European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38902

Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team

Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team

CWE sourceNIST NVD

NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

2026-06-24CVE published

2026-06-24Fixed release or patch reference recorded

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38902↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗

Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report

CVE: Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS: Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS: Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE: Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA: CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD: National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT: A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC: Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF: Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL: Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.

bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix null-ptr-deref in proto update

Published severity in operational context

Evidence used

Compensating controls

Verification

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Release-specific package status

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

National CERT insights
?
CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

EUVD-2026-38902

What, why and how

Exploit reality and attack path

Official authority intelligence

Patch and workaround

Evidence and provenance

What changed after publication