BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-52948High confidence

i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 29 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-52948 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 15 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-52948
266 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent `schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value` warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller state machine corruption. The I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of 10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is subsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies(). A malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes the `arg > INT_MAX` check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This results in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the internal `(int)m adapter->timeout` (a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number. When passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value undergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the `schedule_timeout` warning and causing premature returns. This leaves the SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a local Denial of Service (DoS). Fix this by bounding the user argument to `INT_MAX / 10`. [wsa: move the comment as well]
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-38816

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent `schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value` warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller state machine corruption. The I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of 10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is subsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies(). A malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes the `arg > INT_MAX` check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This results in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the internal `(int)m < 0` check in `msecs_to_jiffies()`. The truncated value is then assigned to `client->adapter->timeout` (a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number. When passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value undergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the `schedule_timeout` warning and causing premature returns. This leaves the SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a local Denial of Service (DoS). Fix this by bounding the user argument to `INT_MAX / 10`. [wsa: move the comment as well]

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent `schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value` warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller state machine corruption. The I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of 10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is subsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies(). A malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes the `arg > INT_MAX` check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This results in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the internal `(int)m < 0` check in `msecs_to_jiffies()`. The truncated value is then assigned to `client->adapter->timeout` (a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number. When passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value undergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the `schedule_timeout` warning and causing premature returns. This leaves the SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a local Denial of Service (DoS). Fix this by bounding the user argument to `INT_MAX / 10`. [wsa: move the comment as well]

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent `schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value` warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller state machine corruption. The I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of 10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is subsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies(). A malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes the `arg > INT_MAX` check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This results in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the internal `(int)m < 0` check in `msecs_to_jiffies()`. The truncated value is then assigned to `client->adapter->timeout` (a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number. When passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value undergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the `schedule_timeout` warning and causing premature returns. This leaves the SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a local Denial of Service (DoS). Fix this by bounding the user argument to `INT_MAX / 10`. [wsa: move the comment as well]

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260701Security Bulletin 1 July 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 1 July 2026, published on 1 July 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-52937 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52938 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52939 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52940 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52943 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52944 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52947 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52949 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52951 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52952 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52953 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52954 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-52937 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52938 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52939 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52940 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52943 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52944 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52947 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52949 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52951 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52952 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52953 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52954 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-52931 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52934 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52938 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52939 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52940 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52947 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52956 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-52937 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52938 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52939 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52940 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52943 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52944 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52947 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52949 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52951 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52952 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52953 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52954 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-52926 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52927 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52930 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52934 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52937 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52947 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52951 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52953 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52956 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52959 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52963 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52964 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1029Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46323 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46324 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52927 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52930 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52933 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52956 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52967 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-52919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52922 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52926 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52931 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52933 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52943 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52951 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52953 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52954 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52956 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52957 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-52933 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52934 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52939 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52943 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52946 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52947 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52954 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52957 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52962 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52963 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52967 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-023799LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて以下の脆弱性が修正されました。・i2c: dev: I2C_TIMEOUT ioctlにおける整数オーバーフローの防止。Syzkallerによるファジング中に、「schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value」という警告が継続的に発生し、それに伴いSMBusコントローラの状態機械が破損する現象が観測されました。I2C_TIMEOUT ioctlはユーザーから提供されるタイムアウト値を10ms単位で受け取ります。ユーザーの引数はINT_MAXと比較してチェックされますが、その後10倍されてmsecs_to_jiffies()関数に渡されます。悪意のあるユーザーは、例えば429496729のような大きな値を渡すことができ、これは「arg > INT_MAX」のチェックを通過しますが、10倍される過程でオーバーフローが発生します。これにより32ビットの符号なし整数値が切り詰められ、msecs_to_jiffies()内の内部チェックである「(int)m < 0」を回避してしまいます。切り詰められた値は「client->adapter->timeout」に割り当てられますが、これは符号付き32ビット整数として解釈されるため負の数になります。この負の値がwait_for_completion_timeout()に渡される際、64ビットの符号なしlongに符号拡張され、「schedule_timeout」という警告を引き起こして早期にリターンします。これによりSMBusの状態機械は回復不能な状態となり、ローカルのサービス拒否(DoS)を引き起こします。この問題はユーザー引数を「INT_MAX / 10」で制限することで修正されました。[wsa: コメントも移動しました]

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.29, 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.94 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.36 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.13 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Jun 2026 · Last source change 29 Jun 2026, 04:18 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-38816
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-52948 · cve.blacktree.nl