BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-49844High confidence

Apache Log4j API: Improper serialization of non-finite floating-point values in MapMessage.asJson()

Apache Software Foundation · Apache Log4j API

6.3MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 4 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.81% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Apache Software Foundation Apache Log4j API and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 4 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 4 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceapache-log4j2Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceapache-log4j2Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceapache-log4j2Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceapache-log4j2Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveapache-log4j2Under evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges4 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-apiECOSYSTEM: introduced 2.13.1; fixed 2.25.52.25.5OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-apiECOSYSTEM: introduced 2.26.0; fixed 2.26.12.26.1OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api>= 2.13.1, < 2.25.52.25.5GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 13 Aug 2026
mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api>= 2.26.0, < 2.26.12.26.1GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 13 Aug 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-43102

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

Improper encoding of non-finite floating-point values during MapMessage JSON serialization in Apache Log4j API produces output that is not valid JSON. This issue affects Apache Log4j API versions 2.13.1 through 2.25.4 and version 2.26.0. The fix for CVE-2026-34481 did not cover all code paths: when a MapMessage contains a non-finite IEEE 754 value (NaN, Infinity, or -Infinity), MapMessage.asJson() emits the corresponding bare token. RFC 8259 does not permit these tokens, so a conformant parser rejects the resulting document. The defect is reachable only when both of the following conditions hold: * The application uses the message resolver https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html#event-template-resolver-message of JsonTemplateLayout or any other layout that relies on MapMessage.asJson() or MapMessage.getFormattedMessage(new String[]{"JSON"}). * The application logs a MapMessage that contains an attacker-controlled floating-point value. An attacker who can supply a non-finite value can cause the affected layout to emit malformed JSON, which may corrupt the enclosing log record or disrupt downstream log ingestion and parsing. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j API 2.25.5 or 2.26.1, both of which emit RFC 8259-compliant JSON for non-finite values.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
6.3 · CVSS 4.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 4 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

Improper encoding of non-finite floating-point values during MapMessage JSON serialization in Apache Log4j API produces output that is not valid JSON. This issue affects Apache Log4j API versions 2.13.1 through 2.25.4 and version 2.26.0. The fix for CVE-2026-34481 did not cover all code paths: when a MapMessage contains a non-finite IEEE 754 value (NaN, Infinity, or -Infinity), MapMessage.asJson() emits the corresponding bare token. RFC 8259 does not permit these tokens, so a conformant parser rejects the resulting document. The defect is reachable only when both of the following conditions hold: * The application uses the message resolver https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html#event-template-resolver-message of JsonTemplateLayout or any other layout that relies on MapMessage.asJson() or MapMessage.getFormattedMessage(new String[]{"JSON"}). * The application logs a MapMessage that contains an attacker-controlled floating-point value. An attacker who can supply a non-finite value can cause the affected layout to emit malformed JSON, which may corrupt the enclosing log record or disrupt downstream log ingestion and parsing. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j API 2.25.5 or 2.26.1, both of which emit RFC 8259-compliant JSON for non-finite values.

What

Improper encoding of non-finite floating-point values during MapMessage JSON serialization in Apache Log4j API produces output that is not valid JSON. This issue affects Apache Log4j API versions 2.13.1 through 2.25.4 and version 2.26.0. The fix for CVE-2026-34481 did not cover all code paths: when a MapMessage contains a non-finite IEEE 754 value (NaN, Infinity, or -Infinity), MapMessage.asJson() emits the corresponding bare token. RFC 8259 does not permit these tokens, so a conformant parser rejects the resulting document. The defect is reachable only when both of the following conditions hold: * The application uses the message resolver https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html#event-template-resolver-message of JsonTemplateLayout or any other layout that relies on MapMessage.asJson() or MapMessage.getFormattedMessage(new String[]{"JSON"}). * The application logs a MapMessage that contains an attacker-controlled floating-point value. An attacker who can supply a non-finite value can cause the affected layout to emit malformed JSON, which may corrupt the enclosing log record or disrupt downstream log ingestion and parsing. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j API 2.25.5 or 2.26.1, both of which emit RFC 8259-compliant JSON for non-finite values.

Why

The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Improper encoding of non-finite floating-point values during MapMessage JSON serialization in Apache Log4j API produces output that is not valid JSON. This issue affects Apache Log4j API versions 2.13.1 through 2.25.4 and version 2.26.0. The fix for CVE-2026-34481 did not cover all code paths: when a MapMessage contains a non-finite IEEE 754 value (NaN, Infinity, or -Infinity), MapMessage.asJson() emits the corresponding bare token. RFC 8259 does not permit these tokens, so a conformant parser rejects the resulting document. The defect is reachable only when both of the following conditions hold: * The application uses the message resolver https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html#event-template-resolver-message of JsonTemplateLayout or any other layout that relies on MapMessage.asJson() or MapMessage.getFormattedMessage(new String[]{"JSON"}). * The application logs a MapMessage that contains an attacker-controlled floating-point value. An attacker who can supply a non-finite value can cause the affected layout to emit malformed JSON, which may corrupt the enclosing log record or disrupt downstream log ingestion and parsing. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j API 2.25.5 or 2.26.1, both of which emit RFC 8259-compliant JSON for non-finite values.

Why

The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-116 ↗

CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output. The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATPresentAttack requirements: A particular deployment or execution condition must be present.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VANoneVulnerable-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SILowSubsequent-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-116
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-43102Official EUVD mapping

Improper encoding of non-finite floating-point values during MapMessage JSON serialization in Apache Log4j API produces output that is not valid JSON. This issue affects Apache Log4j API versions 2.13.1 through 2.25.4 and version 2.26.0. The fix for CVE-2026-34481 did not cover all code paths: when a MapMessage contains a non-finite IEEE 754 value (NaN, Infinity, or -Infinity), MapMessage.asJson() emits the corresponding bare token. RFC 8259 does not permit these tokens, so a conformant parser rejects the resulting document. The defect is reachable only when both of the following conditions hold: * The application uses the message resolver https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html#event-template-resolver-message of JsonTemplateLayout or any other layout that relies on MapMessage.asJson() or MapMessage.getFormattedMessage(new String[]{"JSON"}). * The application logs a MapMessage that contains an attacker-controlled floating-point value. An attacker who can supply a non-finite value can cause the affected layout to emit malformed JSON, which may corrupt the enclosing log record or disrupt downstream log ingestion and parsing. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j API 2.25.5 or 2.26.1, both of which emit RFC 8259-compliant JSON for non-finite values.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3399Oracle Enterprise Manager: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Enterprise Manager ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3403Oracle Communications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2292Apache log4j und Log4cxx: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Manipulation von Dateien

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apache log4j und Apache Log4cxx ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1249Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

rd?id=CVE-2026-4539 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45447 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46595 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46597 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46600 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48864 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53615 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54272 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5435 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54369 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1256Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2026-48586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-4867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4867 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48801 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49975 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1206Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

rd?id=CVE-2026-4867 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48735 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48817 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48818 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49460 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49461 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49851 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50010 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50734 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2026-47890 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-4800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4800 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48589 Référence CVE CVE-2026-48978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50010 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50169 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1121Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-46917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46968 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47010 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-55223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5588 Référence CVE CVE-2026-60147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-6918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6918 Référence CVE CVE-2026-8400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8400 Gestion détaillée du document le 04 septembre 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-48988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49432 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50721 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50722 Référence CVE CVE-2026-50734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50734 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ERecord?id=CVE-2026-46595 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46597 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-4786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4786 Référence CVE CVE-2026-4800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4800 Référence CVE CVE-2026-4867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4867 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-49844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53655 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54592 Référence CVE CVE-2026-54896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-023805Apache Software FoundationのApache Log4jにおけるエンコードおよびエスケープに関する脆弱性

Apache Log4j APIにおけるMapMessageのJSONシリアライズ時に非有限浮動小数点値が不適切にエンコードされるため、有効なJSONではない出力が生成されます。この問題はApache Log4j APIのバージョン2.13.1から2.25.4およびバージョン2.26.0に影響します。CVE-2026-34481の修正はすべてのコード経路をカバーしておらず、MapMessageが非有限のIEEE 754値(NaN、Infinity、または-Infinity)を含む場合、MapMessage.asJson()は対応するベアトークンを出力します。RFC 8259はこれらのトークンを許可していないため、準拠したパーサーは生成されたドキュメントを拒否します。この欠陥は、次の両方の条件が満たされた場合にのみ発生します。・アプリケーションがJsonTemplateLayoutのメッセージリゾルバ(https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html#event-template-resolver-message)またはMapMessage.asJson()やMapMessage.getFormattedMessage(new String[]{"JSON"})に依存するその他のレイアウトを使用していること。・アプリケーションが攻撃者に制御された浮動小数点値を含むMapMessageをログ出力していること。攻撃者が非有限値を提供できる場合、影響を受けるレイアウトは不正なJSONを生成し、それがログレコード全体を破損させたり、下流のログ取り込みや解析を妨害したりする可能性があります。ユーザーには、Apache Log4j API 2.25.5または2.26.1へのアップグレードが推奨されており、これらのバージョンは非有限値に対してRFC 8259準拠のJSONを出力します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0377Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Oracle Enterprise Manager

Apache Log4j versions 2.13.1 through 2.25.4 and 2.26.0 have vulnerabilities including improper JSON encoding of non-finite floating-point values and potential data modification risks, affecting Oracle products such as Autonomous Health Framework and Enterprise Manager with varying exploitability and severity.

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0375Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Oracle Communications

Apache Log4j versions 2.13.1 through 2.25.4 and 2.26.0 have vulnerabilities including improper JSON encoding of non-finite floating-point values and potential data modification risks, affecting Oracle products such as Autonomous Health Framework and Enterprise Manager with varying exploitability and severity.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Apache Log4j API: 2.26.0 < 2.26.1, 2.13.1 < 2.25.5, 3.0.0-alpha1 ≤ 3.0.0-beta2
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Jul 2026 · Last source change 17 Sept 2026, 18:37 UTC · CWE-116 · Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-43102
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    2.13.1 < 2.25.5; 2.26.0 < 2.26.1; 3.0.0-alpha1 ≤ 3.0.0-beta2 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    Apache Log4j API: 2.13.1 < 2.25.5, 2.26.0 < 2.26.1, 3.0.0-alpha1 ≤ 3.0.0-beta2 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-49844 · cve.blacktree.nl