BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46303High confidence

isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

8.2HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.55% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.88-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size rock_continue() reads rs->cont_extent verbatim from the Rock Ridge CE record and passes it to sb_bread() without checking that the block number is within the mounted ISO 9660 volume. commit e595447e177b ("[PATCH] rock.c: handle corrupted directories") added cont_offset and cont_size rejection for the CE continuation but did not validate the extent block number itself. commit f54e18f1b831 ("isofs: Fix infinite looping over CE entries") later capped the CE chain length at RR_MAX_CE_ENTRIES = 32 but again left the block number unchecked. With a crafted ISO mounted via udisks2 (desktop optical auto-mount) or via CAP_SYS_ADMIN mount, rs->cont_extent can therefore point at an out-of-range block or at blocks belonging to an adjacent filesystem on the same block device. sb_bread() on an out-of-range block returns NULL cleanly via the block layer EIO path, so there is no memory-safety violation. For in-range reads of adjacent- filesystem data, the CE buffer is parsed as Rock Ridge records and only the text of SL sub-records reaches userspace through readlink(), which makes the info-leak channel narrow and difficult to exploit; still, rejecting the malformed CE outright matches the rejection shape already present in the same function for cont_offset and cont_size. Add an ISOFS_SB(sb)->s_nzones bounds check to rock_continue() next to the existing offset/size rejection, printing the same corrupted-directory-entry notice.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-35168

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size rock_continue() reads rs->cont_extent verbatim from the Rock Ridge CE record and passes it to sb_bread() without checking that the block number is within the mounted ISO 9660 volume. commit e595447e177b ("[PATCH] rock.c: handle corrupted directories") added cont_offset and cont_size rejection for the CE continuation but did not validate the extent block number itself. commit f54e18f1b831 ("isofs: Fix infinite looping over CE entries") later capped the CE chain length at RR_MAX_CE_ENTRIES = 32 but again left the block number unchecked. With a crafted ISO mounted via udisks2 (desktop optical auto-mount) or via CAP_SYS_ADMIN mount, rs->cont_extent can therefore point at an out-of-range block or at blocks belonging to an adjacent filesystem on the same block device. sb_bread() on an out-of-range block returns NULL cleanly via the block layer EIO path, so there is no memory-safety violation. For in-range reads of adjacent- filesystem data, the CE buffer is parsed as Rock Ridge records and only the text of SL sub-records reaches userspace through readlink(), which makes the info-leak channel narrow and difficult to exploit; still, rejecting the malformed CE outright matches the rejection shape already present in the same function for cont_offset and cont_size. Add an ISOFS_SB(sb)->s_nzones bounds check to rock_continue() next to the existing offset/size rejection, printing the same corrupted-directory-entry notice.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
8.2 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size rock_continue() reads rs->cont_extent verbatim from the Rock Ridge CE record and passes it to sb_bread() without checking that the block number is within the mounted ISO 9660 volume. commit e595447e177b ("[PATCH] rock.c: handle corrupted directories") added cont_offset and cont_size rejection for the CE continuation but did not validate the extent block number itself. commit f54e18f1b831 ("isofs: Fix infinite looping over CE entries") later capped the CE chain length at RR_MAX_CE_ENTRIES = 32 but again left the block number unchecked. With a crafted ISO mounted via udisks2 (desktop optical auto-mount) or via CAP_SYS_ADMIN mount, rs->cont_extent can therefore point at an out-of-range block or at blocks belonging to an adjacent filesystem on the same block device. sb_bread() on an out-of-range block returns NULL cleanly via the block layer EIO path, so there is no memory-safety violation. For in-range reads of adjacent- filesystem data, the CE buffer is parsed as Rock Ridge records and only the text of SL sub-records reaches userspace through readlink(), which makes the info-leak channel narrow and difficult to exploit; still, rejecting the malformed CE outright matches the rejection shape already present in the same function for cont_offset and cont_size. Add an ISOFS_SB(sb)->s_nzones bounds check to rock_continue() next to the existing offset/size rejection, printing the same corrupted-directory-entry notice.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size rock_continue() reads rs->cont_extent verbatim from the Rock Ridge CE record and passes it to sb_bread() without checking that the block number is within the mounted ISO 9660 volume. commit e595447e177b ("[PATCH] rock.c: handle corrupted directories") added cont_offset and cont_size rejection for the CE continuation but did not validate the extent block number itself. commit f54e18f1b831 ("isofs: Fix infinite looping over CE entries") later capped the CE chain length at RR_MAX_CE_ENTRIES = 32 but again left the block number unchecked. With a crafted ISO mounted via udisks2 (desktop optical auto-mount) or via CAP_SYS_ADMIN mount, rs->cont_extent can therefore point at an out-of-range block or at blocks belonging to an adjacent filesystem on the same block device. sb_bread() on an out-of-range block returns NULL cleanly via the block layer EIO path, so there is no memory-safety violation. For in-range reads of adjacent- filesystem data, the CE buffer is parsed as Rock Ridge records and only the text of SL sub-records reaches userspace through readlink(), which makes the info-leak channel narrow and difficult to exploit; still, rejecting the malformed CE outright matches the rejection shape already present in the same function for cont_offset and cont_size. Add an ISOFS_SB(sb)->s_nzones bounds check to rock_continue() next to the existing offset/size rejection, printing the same corrupted-directory-entry notice.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size rock_continue() reads rs->cont_extent verbatim from the Rock Ridge CE record and passes it to sb_bread() without checking that the block number is within the mounted ISO 9660 volume. commit e595447e177b ("[PATCH] rock.c: handle corrupted directories") added cont_offset and cont_size rejection for the CE continuation but did not validate the extent block number itself. commit f54e18f1b831 ("isofs: Fix infinite looping over CE entries") later capped the CE chain length at RR_MAX_CE_ENTRIES = 32 but again left the block number unchecked. With a crafted ISO mounted via udisks2 (desktop optical auto-mount) or via CAP_SYS_ADMIN mount, rs->cont_extent can therefore point at an out-of-range block or at blocks belonging to an adjacent filesystem on the same block device. sb_bread() on an out-of-range block returns NULL cleanly via the block layer EIO path, so there is no memory-safety violation. For in-range reads of adjacent- filesystem data, the CE buffer is parsed as Rock Ridge records and only the text of SL sub-records reaches userspace through readlink(), which makes the info-leak channel narrow and difficult to exploit; still, rejecting the malformed CE outright matches the rejection shape already present in the same function for cont_offset and cont_size. Add an ISOFS_SB(sb)->s_nzones bounds check to rock_continue() next to the existing offset/size rejection, printing the same corrupted-directory-entry notice.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-35168Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size rock_continue() reads rs->cont_extent verbatim from the Rock Ridge CE record and passes it to sb_bread() without checking that the block number is within the mounted ISO 9660 volume. commit e595447e177b ("[PATCH] rock.c: handle corrupted directories") added cont_offset and cont_size rejection for the CE continuation but did not validate the extent block number itself. commit f54e18f1b831 ("isofs: Fix infinite looping over CE entries") later capped the CE chain length at RR_MAX_CE_ENTRIES = 32 but again left the block number unchecked. With a crafted ISO mounted via udisks2 (desktop optical auto-mount) or via CAP_SYS_ADMIN mount, rs->cont_extent can therefore point at an out-of-range block or at blocks belonging to an adjacent filesystem on the same block device. sb_bread() on an out-of-range block returns NULL cleanly via the block layer EIO path, so there is no memory-safety violation. For in-range reads of adjacent- filesystem data, the CE buffer is parsed as Rock Ridge records and only the text of SL sub-records reaches userspace through readlink(), which makes the info-leak channel narrow and difficult to exploit; still, rejecting the malformed CE outright matches the rejection shape already present in the same function for cont_offset and cont_size. Add an ISOFS_SB(sb)->s_nzones bounds check to rock_continue() next to the existing offset/size rejection, printing the same corrupted-directory-entry notice.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1827Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260610Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2026, published on 10 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46298 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46302 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46298 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46302 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46298 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46302 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46290 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46317 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-47333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46298 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46302 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46259 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52911 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0983Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-31692 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63807 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64531 Gestion détaillée du document le 07 août 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46298 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46302 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46298 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46300 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46302 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46305 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46292 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46314 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46320 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0783Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure

ulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46280 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46285 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46287 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46289 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46291 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46292 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46293 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46296 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46299 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46301 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46303 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46304 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46306 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46307 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46312 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46319 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-34180 du 13 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-42766 du 13 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-42767 du 13 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45445 du 13 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45447 du 13 juin 2026 Bulletin de s

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-023172LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。isofsのRock Ridge CE継続エクステントをボリュームサイズに対して検証するrock_continue()は、Rock Ridge CEレコードからrs->cont_extentをそのまま読み取り、マウントされたISO 9660ボリューム内にブロック番号が存在するかどうかをチェックせずにsb_bread()に渡していました。commit e595447e177b(「[PATCH] rock.c: handle corrupted directories」)ではCE継続のためのcont_offsetおよびcont_sizeの拒否を追加しましたが、エクステントのブロック番号自体の検証は行っていませんでした。commit f54e18f1b831(「isofs: Fix infinite looping over CE entries」)では後にCEチェーンの長さをRR_MAX_CE_ENTRIES = 32に制限しましたが、再度ブロック番号のチェックは実施されていませんでした。udisks2(デスクトップの光学ドライブ自動マウント)またはCAP_SYS_ADMIN権限によるマウントで細工されたISOを使用すると、rs->cont_extentは範囲外のブロックや、同じブロックデバイス上の隣接するファイルシステムに属するブロックを指す可能性があります。範囲外のブロックに対するsb_bread()はEIO経路を通じてNULLを正常に返すため、メモリ安全性違反は発生しません。隣接ファイルシステムの範囲内読み取りの場合、CEバッファはRock Ridgeレコードとして解析され、readlink()を通じてユーザ空間に到達するのはSLサブレコードのテキストのみであり、この情報漏洩チャネルは狭く利用が困難です。しかしながら、不正なCEを完全に拒否することは、cont_offsetおよびcont_sizeに対して既に同一関数内で実施されている拒否の方針と一致します。そこでrock_continue()に既存のoffsetおよびsizeの拒否に加えて、ISOFS_SB(sb)->s_nzonesの境界チェックを追加し、同様の破損ディレクトリエントリ通知を出力するようにしました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.19, 5.10.258 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 Jun 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-35168
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < 8356fb821016797f5677cbeee5ddc0d32a95b4be; f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < d582e12378bc1637f337622feef762f53c43fd57; f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < bf1bc673c587f5ef7e9c09b94aea7c5a7847d4d9; f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < c9b37c8b73f6368e4750e5ccb0632c380b43c6e5; f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < 22b36fa081f38ab397c7697f9d539211b51a0cfc; f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < e69da8eeab74b4f4505024c38a17bce060fe7df8; f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < ef048470c90bc8c1b8318bb2ce329da9ef64b9fe; f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < a36d990f591320e9dd379ab30063ebfe91d47e1f · Fixed: < 3.19; 5.10.258 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*
    After
    Linux: f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < 8356fb821016797f5677cbeee5ddc0d32a95b4be, f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < d582e12378bc1637f337622feef762f53c43fd57, f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < bf1bc673c587f5ef7e9c09b94aea7c5a7847d4d9, f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < c9b37c8b73f6368e4750e5ccb0632c380b43c6e5, f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < 22b36fa081f38ab397c7697f9d539211b51a0cfc, f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < e69da8eeab74b4f4505024c38a17bce060fe7df8, f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < ef048470c90bc8c1b8318bb2ce329da9ef64b9fe, f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3d < a36d990f591320e9dd379ab30063ebfe91d47e1f, 08313e26e06d4aa9ce1cbba1a8e359e9cab9ad56, 212c4d33ca83e2144064fe9c2911607fbed5386f, 96e44adce250199ec9b2b928be66365779ff1b59, 1fe5620fcd6c2f0a4a927ee10c8e53196da392f3, fbce0d7dc8965c9fb8d411862040239d4a768c71, 8190393a88f2b0321263a54f2a9eb5a2aa43be7e, 486aa789eadcf44ed87f972b209299c516454693, b6d20edb6e7cedb4eedb9e0193d20dd488ebae84, 2.6.32.66 < 2.6.33, 3.2.67 < 3.3, 3.4.107 < 3.5, 3.10.64 < 3.11, 3.12.36 < 3.13, 3.14.28 < 3.15, 3.17.8 < 3.18, 3.18.2 < 3.19, 3.19 · Fixed: Linux: < 3.19, 5.10.258 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46303 · cve.blacktree.nl