Full vulnerability report · 2026

CVE-2026-46287High confidence

net: txgbe: fix RTNL assertion warning when remove module

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1

Recommended action

Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product

Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →

Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jun 2026

Evidence used

No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Canonical Ubuntu Security: 20 affected package states with no published fix

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states

Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution release	Source package	Vendor state	Fixed version	Evidence
Debian trixietrixie · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`6.12.88-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · source	`linux`	Not affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).	`Not published in this feed`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`7.0.4-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · source	`linux`	Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.	`7.0.4-1`	Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-aws`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-fde`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-azure-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gcp`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gke`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-gkeop`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-ibm`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-lowlatency`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-nvidia-tegra`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oem-6.11`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-oracle`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-raspi-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-realtime`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-riscv`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive	`linux-xilinx`	Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.	`Not published in this feed`	Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current

CVE-2026-46287 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 9 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-46287

2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build
SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms

Summary: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: txgbe: fix RTNL assertion warning when remove module For the copper NIC with external PHY, the driver called phylink_connect_phy() during probe and phylink_disconnect_phy() during remove. It caused an RTNL assertion warning in phylink_disconnect_phy() upon module remove. To fix this, add rtnl_lock() and rtnl_unlock() around the phylink_disconnect_phy() in remove function. ------------[ cut here ]------------ RTNL: assertion failed at drivers/net/phy/phylink.c (2351) WARNING: drivers/net/phy/phylink.c:2351 at phylink_disconnect_phy+0xd8/0xf0 [phylink], CPU#0: rmmod/4464 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4464 Comm: rmmod Kdump: loaded Not tainted 7.0.0-rc4+ Hardware name: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7E16/X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16), BIOS 1.90 12/31/2024 RIP: 0010:phylink_disconnect_phy+0xe4/0xf0 [phylink] Code: 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d 31 c0 31 d2 31 f6 31 ff e9 3a 38 8f e7 48 8d 3d 48 87 e2 ff ba 2f 09 00 00 48 c7 c6 c1 22 24 c0 48 0f b9 3a e9 34 ff ff ff 66 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 RSP: 0018:ffffce7288363ac0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff89654b2a1a00 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000092f RSI: ffffffffc02422c1 RDI: ffffffffc0239020 RBP: ffffce7288363ae8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8964c4022000 R13: ffff89654fce3028 R14: ffff89654ebb4000 R15: ffffffffc0226348 FS: 0000795e80d93780(0000) GS:ffff896c52857000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005b528b592000 CR3: 0000000170d0f000 CR4: 0000000000f50ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: txgbe_remove_phy+0xbb/0xd0 [txgbe] txgbe_remove+0x4c/0xb0 [txgbe] pci_device_remove+0x41/0xb0 device_remove+0x43/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x206/0x270 driver_detach+0x4a/0xa0 bus_remove_driver+0x83/0x120 driver_unregister+0x2f/0x60 pci_unregister_driver+0x40/0x90 txgbe_driver_exit+0x10/0x850 [txgbe] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x1c3/0x2f0 __x64_sys_delete_module+0x12/0x20 x64_sys_call+0x20c3/0x2390 do_syscall_64+0x11c/0x1500 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? do_syscall_64+0x15a/0x1500 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? do_fault+0x312/0x580 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __handle_mm_fault+0x9d5/0x1040 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? count_memcg_events+0x101/0x1d0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? handle_mm_fault+0x1e8/0x2f0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2f8/0x820 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? irqentry_exit+0xb2/0x600 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? exc_page_fault+0x92/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Remediation: To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Fix availability varies by product

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: txgbe: fix RTNL assertion warning when remove module For the copper NIC with external PHY, the driver called phylink_connect_phy() during probe and phylink_disconnect_phy() during remove. It caused an RTNL assertion warning in phylink_disconnect_phy() upon module remove. To fix this, add rtnl_lock() and rtnl_unlock() around the phylink_disconnect_phy() in remove function. ------------[ cut here ]------------ RTNL: assertion failed at drivers/net/phy/phylink.c (2351) WARNING: drivers/net/phy/phylink.c:2351 at phylink_disconnect_phy+0xd8/0xf0 [phylink], CPU#0: rmmod/4464 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4464 Comm: rmmod Kdump: loaded Not tainted 7.0.0-rc4+ Hardware name: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7E16/X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16), BIOS 1.90 12/31/2024 RIP: 0010:phylink_disconnect_phy+0xe4/0xf0 [phylink] Code: 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d 31 c0 31 d2 31 f6 31 ff e9 3a 38 8f e7 48 8d 3d 48 87 e2 ff ba 2f 09 00 00 48 c7 c6 c1 22 24 c0 <67> 48 0f b9 3a e9 34 ff ff ff 66 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 RSP: 0018:ffffce7288363ac0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff89654b2a1a00 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000092f RSI: ffffffffc02422c1 RDI: ffffffffc0239020 RBP: ffffce7288363ae8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8964c4022000 R13: ffff89654fce3028 R14: ffff89654ebb4000 R15: ffffffffc0226348 FS: 0000795e80d93780(0000) GS:ffff896c52857000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005b528b592000 CR3: 0000000170d0f000 CR4: 0000000000f50ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> txgbe_remove_phy+0xbb/0xd0 [txgbe] txgbe_remove+0x4c/0xb0 [txgbe] pci_device_remove+0x41/0xb0 device_remove+0x43/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x206/0x270 driver_detach+0x4a/0xa0 bus_remove_driver+0x83/0x120 driver_unregister+0x2f/0x60 pci_unregister_driver+0x40/0x90 txgbe_driver_exit+0x10/0x850 [txgbe] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x1c3/0x2f0 __x64_sys_delete_module+0x12/0x20 x64_sys_call+0x20c3/0x2390 do_syscall_64+0x11c/0x1500 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? do_syscall_64+0x15a/0x1500 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? do_fault+0x312/0x580 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __handle_mm_fault+0x9d5/0x1040 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? count_memcg_events+0x101/0x1d0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? handle_mm_fault+0x1e8/0x2f0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2f8/0x820 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? irqentry_exit+0xb2/0x600 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? exc_page_fault+0x92/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

What

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material

Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.

None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path: local access → Reachable Assertion → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface: Local
Privileges required: Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction: None
Attack complexity: Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary: Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ? CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.: CWE-617 ↗
CWE-617: Reachable Assertion. The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.
CVSS vector ? CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land: The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.

CWE-617

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-35152Official EUVD mapping

0 linked advisory records.

Official EUVD record ↗

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1827Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260610Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2026, published on 10 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46286 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46290 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46292 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46286 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46292 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46312 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46286 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46290 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46292 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46286 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46300 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46316 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46286 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46290 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46300 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46316 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46323 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0783Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure

TFR-2026-AVI-0783 Affaire suivie par: CERT-FR Avis du CERT-FR Objet: Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Gestion du document Référence CERTFR-2026-AVI-0783 Titre Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Date de la première version 19 juin 2026 Date de la dernière version 19 juin 2026 Source(s) Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-8643 du 04 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-10275 du 05 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46274 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46280 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46285 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46287 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46289 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46291 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46292 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46293 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46296 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46299 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46301 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46303 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46304 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46306 du 10 juin 2026 Bulletin de s

Official advisory ↗

JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-023187LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける到達可能なアサーションに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。net: txgbe: モジュール削除時のRTNLアサーション警告を修正しました。外部PHYを持つ銅線NICにおいて、ドライバーはプローブ時にphylink_connect_phy()を呼び出し、モジュール削除時にphylink_disconnect_phy()を呼び出していました。その結果、モジュール削除時にphylink_disconnect_phy()内でRTNLアサーション警告が発生していました。この問題を修正するために、remove関数内のphylink_disconnect_phy()の前後にrtnl_lock()とrtnl_unlock()を追加しています。 ------------[ ここで切り取る ]------------ RTNL: drivers/net/phy/phylink.c (2351)でアサーション失敗が発生しました。 WARNING: drivers/net/phy/phylink.c:2351 phylink_disconnect_phy+0xd8/0xf0 [phylink], CPU#0: rmmod/4464 モジュールはリンク済みです。 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4464 Comm: rmmod Kdump: loaded 未汚染 7.0.0-rc4+ ハードウェア名: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7E16/X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16), BIOS 1.90 2024/12/31 RIP: 0010:phylink_disconnect_phy+0xe4/0xf0 [phylink] （省略）コールトレース: ＜TASK＞ txgbe_remove_phy+0xbb/0xd0 [txgbe] txgbe_remove+0x4c/0xb0 [txgbe] pci_device_remove+0x41/0xb0 device_remove+0x43/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x206/0x270 driver_detach+0x4a/0xa0 bus_remove_driver+0x83/0x120 driver_unregister+0x2f/0x60 pci_unregister_driver+0x40/0x90 txgbe_driver_exit+0x10/0x850 [txgbe] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x1c3/0x2f0 __x64_sys_delete_module+0x12/0x20 x64_sys_call+0x20c3/0x2390 do_syscall_64+0x11c/0x1500 （省略）

Official advisory ↗

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status ? Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.: Fix availability varies by product
Affected: SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build
SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms
Fixed: Linux: < 6.6, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.27 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.4 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action: Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround: No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 Jun 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 18:06 UTC · CWE-617 · Reachable Assertion

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2

CVSS sourceNIST NVD

EPSS source

The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.

FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14

European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-35152

Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team

Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team

CWE sourceNIST NVD

NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

2026-06-08CVE published

2026-06-14Fixed release or patch reference recorded

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-35152↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗

Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report

CVE: Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS: Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS: Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE: Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA: CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD: National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT: A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC: Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF: Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL: Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.

net: txgbe: fix RTNL assertion warning when remove module

Published severity in operational context

Evidence used

Compensating controls

Verification

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Release-specific package status

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

National CERT insights
?
CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

EUVD-2026-35152

What, why and how

Exploit reality and attack path

Official authority intelligence

Patch and workaround

Evidence and provenance

What changed after publication