BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46276High confidence

drm/amdgpu: fix zero-size GDS range init on RDNA4

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.86-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-46276 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 10 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-46276
151 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: fix zero-size GDS range init on RDNA4 RDNA4 (GFX 12) hardware removes the GDS, GWS, and OA on-chip memory resources. The gfx_v12_0 initialisation code correctly leaves adev->gds.gds_size, adev->gds.gws_size, and adev->gds.oa_size at zero to reflect this. amdgpu_ttm_init() unconditionally calls amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() for each of these resources regardless of size. When the size is zero, amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() forwards the call to ttm_range_man_init(), which calls drm_mm_init(mm, 0, 0). drm_mm_init() immediately fires DRM_MM_BUG_ON(start + size <= start) -- trivially true when size is zero -- crashing the kernel during modprobe of amdgpu on an RX 9070 XT. Guard against this by returning 0 early from amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() when size_in_page is zero. This skips TTM resource manager registration for hardware resources that are absent, without affecting any other GPU type. DRM_MM_BUG_ON() only asserts if CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MM is enabled in the kernel config. This is apparently rarely enabled as these chips have been in the market for over a year and this issue was only reported now. Oops-Analysis: http://oops.fenrus.org/reports/bugzilla.korg/221376/report.html (cherry picked from commit 5719ce5865279cad4fd5f01011fe037168503f2d)
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-35141

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: fix zero-size GDS range init on RDNA4 RDNA4 (GFX 12) hardware removes the GDS, GWS, and OA on-chip memory resources. The gfx_v12_0 initialisation code correctly leaves adev->gds.gds_size, adev->gds.gws_size, and adev->gds.oa_size at zero to reflect this. amdgpu_ttm_init() unconditionally calls amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() for each of these resources regardless of size. When the size is zero, amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() forwards the call to ttm_range_man_init(), which calls drm_mm_init(mm, 0, 0). drm_mm_init() immediately fires DRM_MM_BUG_ON(start + size <= start) -- trivially true when size is zero -- crashing the kernel during modprobe of amdgpu on an RX 9070 XT. Guard against this by returning 0 early from amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() when size_in_page is zero. This skips TTM resource manager registration for hardware resources that are absent, without affecting any other GPU type. DRM_MM_BUG_ON() only asserts if CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MM is enabled in the kernel config. This is apparently rarely enabled as these chips have been in the market for over a year and this issue was only reported now. Oops-Analysis: http://oops.fenrus.org/reports/bugzilla.korg/221376/report.html (cherry picked from commit 5719ce5865279cad4fd5f01011fe037168503f2d)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: fix zero-size GDS range init on RDNA4 RDNA4 (GFX 12) hardware removes the GDS, GWS, and OA on-chip memory resources. The gfx_v12_0 initialisation code correctly leaves adev->gds.gds_size, adev->gds.gws_size, and adev->gds.oa_size at zero to reflect this. amdgpu_ttm_init() unconditionally calls amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() for each of these resources regardless of size. When the size is zero, amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() forwards the call to ttm_range_man_init(), which calls drm_mm_init(mm, 0, 0). drm_mm_init() immediately fires DRM_MM_BUG_ON(start + size <= start) -- trivially true when size is zero -- crashing the kernel during modprobe of amdgpu on an RX 9070 XT. Guard against this by returning 0 early from amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() when size_in_page is zero. This skips TTM resource manager registration for hardware resources that are absent, without affecting any other GPU type. DRM_MM_BUG_ON() only asserts if CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MM is enabled in the kernel config. This is apparently rarely enabled as these chips have been in the market for over a year and this issue was only reported now. Oops-Analysis: http://oops.fenrus.org/reports/bugzilla.korg/221376/report.html (cherry picked from commit 5719ce5865279cad4fd5f01011fe037168503f2d)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: fix zero-size GDS range init on RDNA4 RDNA4 (GFX 12) hardware removes the GDS, GWS, and OA on-chip memory resources. The gfx_v12_0 initialisation code correctly leaves adev->gds.gds_size, adev->gds.gws_size, and adev->gds.oa_size at zero to reflect this. amdgpu_ttm_init() unconditionally calls amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() for each of these resources regardless of size. When the size is zero, amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() forwards the call to ttm_range_man_init(), which calls drm_mm_init(mm, 0, 0). drm_mm_init() immediately fires DRM_MM_BUG_ON(start + size <= start) -- trivially true when size is zero -- crashing the kernel during modprobe of amdgpu on an RX 9070 XT. Guard against this by returning 0 early from amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip() when size_in_page is zero. This skips TTM resource manager registration for hardware resources that are absent, without affecting any other GPU type. DRM_MM_BUG_ON() only asserts if CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MM is enabled in the kernel config. This is apparently rarely enabled as these chips have been in the market for over a year and this issue was only reported now. Oops-Analysis: http://oops.fenrus.org/reports/bugzilla.korg/221376/report.html (cherry picked from commit 5719ce5865279cad4fd5f01011fe037168503f2d)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1827Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260610Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2026, published on 10 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46263 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46286 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46292 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46254 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46259 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46263 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46286 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46312 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46250 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46259 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-46233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46235 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46285 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46292 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46254 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46259 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46254 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46259 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46280 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46282 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-023198LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。drm/amdgpu: RDNA4におけるサイズ0のGDS範囲初期化の修正。RDNA4（GFX 12）ハードウェアは、GDS、GWS、およびOAオンチップメモリリソースを除去しています。gfx_v12_0の初期化コードはこの点を反映し、adev-＞gds.gds_size、adev-＞gds.gws_size、およびadev-＞gds.oa_sizeを正しく0のままにしています。しかし、amdgpu_ttm_init()はそれらのリソースサイズに関係なく無条件にamdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip()を呼び出します。サイズが0の場合、amdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip()はttm_range_man_init()を呼び出し、それがdrm_mm_init(mm, 0, 0)を呼び出します。drm_mm_init()は直ちにDRM_MM_BUG_ON(start + size ＜= start)を発動しますが、サイズが0のときは自明に真となるため、RX 9070 XTのamdgpuモジュール読み込み時にカーネルがクラッシュします。この問題を防ぐため、size_in_pageが0のときはamdgpu_ttm_init_on_chip()から早期に0を返すようにしました。これにより、存在しないハードウェアリソースのTTMリソースマネージャ登録をスキップし、他のGPUタイプには影響を与えません。なお、DRM_MM_BUG_ON()はカーネル設定でCONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MMが有効な場合にのみアサートが発動します。この設定は稀にしか有効にされておらず、これらのチップは1年以上市場に出ているにもかかわらず、本問題の報告は最近になって起きたものです。Oops解析は以下のURLで確認できます。http://oops.fenrus.org/reports/bugzilla.korg/221376/report.html（5719ce5865279cad4fd5f01011fe037168503f2dのコミットからチェリーピックされています）。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.20, 5.10.258 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.86 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.27 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.4 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 Jun 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-35141
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-35141↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46276 · cve.blacktree.nl