BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46223High confidence

cgroup: Defer css percpu_ref kill on rmdir until cgroup is depopulated

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 12 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.11% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 12 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

16 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 12 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-7.0Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32850

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 12 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cgroup: Defer css percpu_ref kill on rmdir until cgroup is depopulated A chain of commits going back to v7.0 reworked rmdir to satisfy the controller invariant that a subsystem's ->css_offline() must not run while tasks are still doing kernel-side work in the cgroup. [1] d245698d727a ("cgroup: Defer task cgroup unlink until after the task is done switching out") [2] a72f73c4dd9b ("cgroup: Don't expose dead tasks in cgroup") [3] 1b164b876c36 ("cgroup: Wait for dying tasks to leave on rmdir") [4] 4c56a8ac6869 ("cgroup: Fix cgroup_drain_dying() testing the wrong condition") [5] 13e786b64bd3 ("cgroup: Increment nr_dying_subsys_* from rmdir context") [1] moved task cset unlink from do_exit() to finish_task_switch() so a task's cset link drops only after the task has fully stopped scheduling. That made tasks past exit_signals() linger on cset->tasks until their final context switch, which led to a series of problems as what userspace expected to see after rmdir diverged from what the kernel needs to wait for. [2]-[5] tried to bridge that divergence: [2] filtered the exiting tasks from cgroup.procs; [3] had rmdir(2) sleep in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE for them; [4] fixed the wait's condition; [5] made nr_dying_subsys_* visible synchronously. The cgroup_drain_dying() wait in [3] turned out to be a dead end. When the rmdir caller is also the reaper of a zombie that pins a pidns teardown (e.g. host PID 1 systemd reaping orphan pids that were re-parented to it during the same teardown), rmdir blocks in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE waiting for those pids to free, the pids can't free because PID 1 is the reaper and it's stuck in rmdir, and the system A-A deadlocks. No internal lock ordering breaks this; the wait itself is the bug. The css killing side that drove the original reorder, however, can be made cleanly asynchronous: ->css_offline() is already async, run from css_killed_work_fn() driven by percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(). The fix is to make that chain start only after all tasks have left the cgroup. rmdir's user-visible side then returns as soon as cgroup.procs and friends are empty, while ->css_offline() still runs only after the cgroup is fully drained. Verified by the original reproducer (pidns teardown + zombie reaper, runs under vng) which hangs vanilla and succeeds here, and by per-commit deterministic repros for [2], [3], [4], [5] with a boot parameter that widens the post-exit_signals() window so each state is reliably reachable. Some stress tests on top of that. cgroup_apply_control_disable() has the same shape of pre-existing race: when a controller is disabled via subtree_control, kill_css() ran synchronously while tasks past exit_signals() could still be linked to the cgroup's csets, and ->css_offline() could fire before they drained. This patch preserves the existing synchronous behavior at that call site (kill_css_sync() + kill_css_finish() back-to-back) and a follow-up patch will defer kill_css_finish() there using a per-css trigger. This seems like the right approach and I don't see problems with it. The changes are somewhat invasive but not excessively so, so backporting to -stable should be okay. If something does turn out to be wrong, the fallback is to revert the entire chain ([1]-[5]) and rework in the development branch instead. v2: Pin cgrp across the deferred destroy work with explicit cgroup_get()/cgroup_put() around queue_work() and the work_fn. v1 wasn't actually broken (ordered cgroup_offline_wq + queue_work order in cgroup_task_dead() saved it) but the explicit ref removes the dependency on those non-obvious invariants. Also note the pre-existing cgroup_apply_control_disable() race in the description; a follow-up will defer kill_css_finish() there.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cgroup: Defer css percpu_ref kill on rmdir until cgroup is depopulated A chain of commits going back to v7.0 reworked rmdir to satisfy the controller invariant that a subsystem's ->css_offline() must not run while tasks are still doing kernel-side work in the cgroup. [1] d245698d727a ("cgroup: Defer task cgroup unlink until after the task is done switching out") [2] a72f73c4dd9b ("cgroup: Don't expose dead tasks in cgroup") [3] 1b164b876c36 ("cgroup: Wait for dying tasks to leave on rmdir") [4] 4c56a8ac6869 ("cgroup: Fix cgroup_drain_dying() testing the wrong condition") [5] 13e786b64bd3 ("cgroup: Increment nr_dying_subsys_* from rmdir context") [1] moved task cset unlink from do_exit() to finish_task_switch() so a task's cset link drops only after the task has fully stopped scheduling. That made tasks past exit_signals() linger on cset->tasks until their final context switch, which led to a series of problems as what userspace expected to see after rmdir diverged from what the kernel needs to wait for. [2]-[5] tried to bridge that divergence: [2] filtered the exiting tasks from cgroup.procs; [3] had rmdir(2) sleep in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE for them; [4] fixed the wait's condition; [5] made nr_dying_subsys_* visible synchronously. The cgroup_drain_dying() wait in [3] turned out to be a dead end. When the rmdir caller is also the reaper of a zombie that pins a pidns teardown (e.g. host PID 1 systemd reaping orphan pids that were re-parented to it during the same teardown), rmdir blocks in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE waiting for those pids to free, the pids can't free because PID 1 is the reaper and it's stuck in rmdir, and the system A-A deadlocks. No internal lock ordering breaks this; the wait itself is the bug. The css killing side that drove the original reorder, however, can be made cleanly asynchronous: ->css_offline() is already async, run from css_killed_work_fn() driven by percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(). The fix is to make that chain start only after all tasks have left the cgroup. rmdir's user-visible side then returns as soon as cgroup.procs and friends are empty, while ->css_offline() still runs only after the cgroup is fully drained. Verified by the original reproducer (pidns teardown + zombie reaper, runs under vng) which hangs vanilla and succeeds here, and by per-commit deterministic repros for [2], [3], [4], [5] with a boot parameter that widens the post-exit_signals() window so each state is reliably reachable. Some stress tests on top of that. cgroup_apply_control_disable() has the same shape of pre-existing race: when a controller is disabled via subtree_control, kill_css() ran synchronously while tasks past exit_signals() could still be linked to the cgroup's csets, and ->css_offline() could fire before they drained. This patch preserves the existing synchronous behavior at that call site (kill_css_sync() + kill_css_finish() back-to-back) and a follow-up patch will defer kill_css_finish() there using a per-css trigger. This seems like the right approach and I don't see problems with it. The changes are somewhat invasive but not excessively so, so backporting to -stable should be okay. If something does turn out to be wrong, the fallback is to revert the entire chain ([1]-[5]) and rework in the development branch instead. v2: Pin cgrp across the deferred destroy work with explicit cgroup_get()/cgroup_put() around queue_work() and the work_fn. v1 wasn't actually broken (ordered cgroup_offline_wq + queue_work order in cgroup_task_dead() saved it) but the explicit ref removes the dependency on those non-obvious invariants. Also note the pre-existing cgroup_apply_control_disable() race in the description; a follow-up will defer kill_css_finish() there.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cgroup: Defer css percpu_ref kill on rmdir until cgroup is depopulated A chain of commits going back to v7.0 reworked rmdir to satisfy the controller invariant that a subsystem's ->css_offline() must not run while tasks are still doing kernel-side work in the cgroup. [1] d245698d727a ("cgroup: Defer task cgroup unlink until after the task is done switching out") [2] a72f73c4dd9b ("cgroup: Don't expose dead tasks in cgroup") [3] 1b164b876c36 ("cgroup: Wait for dying tasks to leave on rmdir") [4] 4c56a8ac6869 ("cgroup: Fix cgroup_drain_dying() testing the wrong condition") [5] 13e786b64bd3 ("cgroup: Increment nr_dying_subsys_* from rmdir context") [1] moved task cset unlink from do_exit() to finish_task_switch() so a task's cset link drops only after the task has fully stopped scheduling. That made tasks past exit_signals() linger on cset->tasks until their final context switch, which led to a series of problems as what userspace expected to see after rmdir diverged from what the kernel needs to wait for. [2]-[5] tried to bridge that divergence: [2] filtered the exiting tasks from cgroup.procs; [3] had rmdir(2) sleep in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE for them; [4] fixed the wait's condition; [5] made nr_dying_subsys_* visible synchronously. The cgroup_drain_dying() wait in [3] turned out to be a dead end. When the rmdir caller is also the reaper of a zombie that pins a pidns teardown (e.g. host PID 1 systemd reaping orphan pids that were re-parented to it during the same teardown), rmdir blocks in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE waiting for those pids to free, the pids can't free because PID 1 is the reaper and it's stuck in rmdir, and the system A-A deadlocks. No internal lock ordering breaks this; the wait itself is the bug. The css killing side that drove the original reorder, however, can be made cleanly asynchronous: ->css_offline() is already async, run from css_killed_work_fn() driven by percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(). The fix is to make that chain start only after all tasks have left the cgroup. rmdir's user-visible side then returns as soon as cgroup.procs and friends are empty, while ->css_offline() still runs only after the cgroup is fully drained. Verified by the original reproducer (pidns teardown + zombie reaper, runs under vng) which hangs vanilla and succeeds here, and by per-commit deterministic repros for [2], [3], [4], [5] with a boot parameter that widens the post-exit_signals() window so each state is reliably reachable. Some stress tests on top of that. cgroup_apply_control_disable() has the same shape of pre-existing race: when a controller is disabled via subtree_control, kill_css() ran synchronously while tasks past exit_signals() could still be linked to the cgroup's csets, and ->css_offline() could fire before they drained. This patch preserves the existing synchronous behavior at that call site (kill_css_sync() + kill_css_finish() back-to-back) and a follow-up patch will defer kill_css_finish() there using a per-css trigger. This seems like the right approach and I don't see problems with it. The changes are somewhat invasive but not excessively so, so backporting to -stable should be okay. If something does turn out to be wrong, the fallback is to revert the entire chain ([1]-[5]) and rework in the development branch instead. v2: Pin cgrp across the deferred destroy work with explicit cgroup_get()/cgroup_put() around queue_work() and the work_fn. v1 wasn't actually broken (ordered cgroup_offline_wq + queue_work order in cgroup_task_dead() saved it) but the explicit ref removes the dependency on those non-obvious invariants. Also note the pre-existing cgroup_apply_control_disable() race in the description; a follow-up will defer kill_css_finish() there.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46224 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46228 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-019499LinuxのLinux Kernelにおけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、次の脆弱性が修正されました。cgroupのrmdir時に発生していたcss percpu_refのキル処理を、cgroupが空になるまで延期するようにしました。v7.0以降の一連のコミットでrmdir処理を再設計し、サブシステムの-css_offline()がcgroup内でカーネル側の作業がまだ行われている間は実行されないというコントローラーの不変条件を満たすように対応しました。[1] d245698d727aではtask csetのunlink処理をdo_exit()からfinish_task_switch()に移動し、タスクのスケジューリング停止後にリンクが解除されるようにしました。これにより、exit_signals()後のタスクが最終コンテキストスイッチまでcset-tasksに残留し、ユーザ空間の期待とカーネル側の待機条件に乖離が生じました。[2]-[5]ではこの乖離を調整しています。[2]では終了中のタスクをcgroup.procsから除外し、[3]ではrmdir(2)をTASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE状態で待機させ、[4]で待機条件を修正し、[5]でnr_dying_subsys_*を同期的に可視化しました。しかし、[3]のcgroup_drain_dying()の待機は根本的な問題解決にはならず、rmdir呼び出し元がゾンビの再逐次処理者である場合にデッドロックが発生しました。そのため、cssのキル処理側は非同期で実行されるべきであり、-css_offline()は既にpercpu_ref_kill_and_confirm()により非同期でcss_killed_work_fn()から実行されています。修正内容は、すべてのタスクがcgroupを離れるまでこの処理を開始しないようにすることです。rmdirのユーザから見える側はcgroup.procs等が空になるとすぐに戻りますが、-css_offline()はcgroupが完全に空になるまで実行されません。元の再現テスト(pidnsの解放およびゾンビ再逐次処理者の挙動確認)が成功し、コミットごとの決定論的再現テストも行われています。cgroup_apply_control_disable()に存在した既存の競合も同様の形で、kill_css()は同期的に実行され、exit_signals()後のタスクがまだcsetにリンクされたまま-css_offline()が先行することがありました。本パッチでは同期的動作を保持しつつ、後続のパッチでkill_css_finish()の遅延実行を行います。この方法は適切であり、大きな問題は見当たりません。変更はやや侵襲的ですが過度ではなく、安定版へのバックポートが可能です。問題があれば、一連のコミット[1]-[5]を元に戻して開発ブランチで再検討します。v2では遅延破棄処理の周囲に明示的なcgroup_get()/cgroup_put()を追加して参照を固定しました。v1は本質的に破綻していませんでしたが、この明示的参照により非明示の不変条件への依存が排除されています。以上のように、cgroupのrmdir処理におけるタスク終了管理とcssキル処理を改善したことで、デッドロックや不正な状態遷移を防止しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 1b164b876c36c3eb5561dd9b37702b04401b0166 < 33fa2e6b1507a0a377a151a8826438bedad1d0b0, 1b164b876c36c3eb5561dd9b37702b04401b0166 < 93618edf753838a727dbff63c7c291dee22d656b, 78c72bce4a87819126211c0d24e18350010604fb, 6.19.12 < 6.20, 7.0
Fixed
Linux: < 7.0, 7.0.9 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 18:03 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32850
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46223 · cve.blacktree.nl